In preparation for adding automatic CORS rules creation
for direct S3 uploads, I am adding tests here and moving the
CORS rule definitions into a dedicated class so they are all
in the one place.
There is a problem with ensure_cors! as well -- if there is
already a CORS rule defined (presumably the asset one) then
we do nothing and do not apply the new rule. This means that
the S3BackupStore.ensure_cors method does nothing right now
if the assets rule is already defined, and it will mean the
same for any direct S3 upload rules I add for uppy. We need
to be able to add more rules, not just one.
This is not a problem on our hosting because we define the
rules at an infra level.
If the initial `get`/`head` response within `resolve` returns a status code of `103`, attempt to fetch the same URL with the alternative `small_get` method.
* FIX: allowed_theme_ids should not be persisted in GlobalSettings
It was observed that the memoized value of `GlobalSetting.allowed_theme_ids` would be persisted across requests, which could lead to unpredictable/undesired behaviours in a multisite environment.
This change moves that logic out of GlobalSettings so that the returned theme IDs are correct for the current site.
Uses get_set_cache, which ultimately uses DistributedCache, which will take care of multisite issues for us.
A follow up PR should investigate why `proposal-logical-assignment-operators` is not getting used here (test file?) but this should be enough to get things running.
* DEV: Sanitize HTML admin inputs
This PR adds on-save HTML sanitization for:
Client site settings
translation overrides
badges descriptions
user fields descriptions
I used Rails's SafeListSanitizer, which [accepts the following HTML tags and attributes](018cf54073/lib/rails/html/sanitizer.rb (L108))
* Make sure that the sanitization logic doesn't corrupt settings with special characters
I was previously relying on `this.isDestroying` returning `true` during `willDestroyElement`. This was an incorrect assumption.
This commit refactors the logic into an explicit `cleanup` function, and also adds some cleanup for empty keys in the `subscribedProxy` array
The flow goes from:
- getting current user object
- creating a POJO using some of the current user keys
- passing this POJO around, which end up being used in message bus
- the processing fn associated ens up doing User.create on this object will both create a User object, but also inject store in it, store is holding a reference to currentUser Object and...
BOOM, we have an object holding a reference to the same object, which JSON.stringify used in prepareBody of pretender doesn't like.
This PR doesn't change any behavior, but just removes code that wasn't in use. This is a pretty dangerous place to change, since it gets called during user's registration. At the same time the refactoring is very straightforward, it's clear that this code wasn't doing any work (it still needs to be double-checked during review though). Also, the test coverage of UserNameSuggester is good.
