The UI prevents users from trying to create tags on topics when they
don't have permission, but if you are trying to add tags to a topic via
the API and you don't have permission before this change it would
silently succeed in creating the topic, but it wouldn't have any tags.
Now a 422 error will be returned with an error message when trying to
create a topic with tags when tagging is disabled or you don't have
enough trust level to add tags to a topic.
Bug report: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/70525/14
Normally, secure media urls are linked like `/secure-media-uploads/...`. In this case, uploads were already being linked correctly.
But sometimes (e.g. when pulling hotlinked onebox images) secure media is referenced with a full domain name (`//example.com/secure-media-uploads`). This commit ensures that those uploads are also linked correctly.
Legacy Firefox Android has some quirks around vibration where it:
- asks for permission
- doesn't persist the permission
This makes the default like vibration popup a permission on Firefox
Android <= 68.
This isn't the case (yet?) on their new Firefox which is rolling out
worldwide right now.
I'd say we merge this now and revert in 3 months or so when
https://arewefenixyet.com/ shows a full rollout.
When a tab is open but left unattended for a while, the red, green, and blue
pills tend to go out of sync.
So whevener we open the notifications menu, we sync up the notification count
(eg. blue and green pills) with the server.
However, the reviewable count (eg. the red pill) is not a notification and
is located in the hamburger menu. This commit adds a new route on the server
side to retrieve the reviewable count for the current user and a ping
(refreshReviewableCount) from the client side to sync the reviewable count
whenever they open the hamburger menu.
REFACTOR: I also refactored the hamburger-menu widget code to prevent repetitive uses
of "this.".
PERF: I improved the performance of the 'notify_reviewable' job by doing only 1 query
to the database to retrieve all the pending reviewables and then tallying based on the
various rights.
This hack is only attempting to hide something which should have been working in core and for which we should provide a fix soon. Also it's not working as it should.
Similar to `advanced_filter` I introduced `advanced_order`.
I needed a new option because default orders are evaluated after advanced_filter so I couldn't use it.
Also, that part is a little bit more generic
```
elsif word =~ /order:\w+/
@order = word.gsub('order:', '').to_sym
nil
```
After those changes, I can use them in plugins in this way:
```
Search.advanced_order(:votes) do |posts|
posts.reorder("COALESCE((SELECT dvvc.counter FROM discourse_voting_vote_counters dvvc WHERE dvvc.topic_id = subquery.topic_id), 0) DESC")
end
```
When inviting users to a PM a small post is created showing that you
invited the user, but the actual list of participants never updated
until you refreshed the page or interacted with the private-message-map
widget triggering it to refresh. This change will trigger a refresh on
the private-message-map widget ensuring that the UI is updated with the
current list of participants.
* FEATURE: set notification levels when added to a group
This feature allows admins and group owners to define default
category and tag tracking levels that will be applied to user
preferences automatically at the time when users are added to the
group. Users are free to change those preferences afterwards.
When removed from a group, the user's notification preferences aren't
changed.
The poll breakdown modal replaces the grouped pie charts feature.
Includes:
* MODAL: Untangle `onSelectPanel`
Previously modal-tab component would call on click the onSelectPanel callback with itself (modal-tab) as `this` which severely limited its usefulness. Now showModal binds the callback to its controller.
"The PR includes a fix/change to d-modal (b7f6ec6) that hasn't been extracted to a separate PR because it's not currently possible to test a change like this in abstract, i.e. with dynamically created controllers/components in tests. The percentage/count toggle test for the poll breakdown feature is essentially a test for that d-modal modification."
If a plugin name contained the name of another plugin, the wrong stylesheets would be reloaded. For example, working on discourse-prometheus-alert-receiver would cause discourse-prometheus stylesheets to be reloaded.
