This change encourages users to title their threads to make it easier for other users to join in on conversations that matter to them.
The creator of the chat thread will receive a toast notification prompting them to add a thread title when on mobile and the thread has at least 5 sent replies.
This change moves the chat message excerpt into a new database column (string) on the chat_messages table.
As part of this change, we will now set the excerpt within the `Chat::CreateMessage` service, and update it within the `Chat::UpdateMessage` service.
Forcing a thread will work even in channel which don't have `threading_enabled` or in direct message channels.
For now this feature is only available through the `ChatSDK`:
```ruby
ChatSDK::Message.create(in_reply_to_id: 1, guardian: guardian, raw: "foo bar baz", channel_id: 2, force_thread: true)
```
This commit introduces the possibility to stream messages. To allow plugins to use streaming this commit also ships a `ChatSDK` library to allow to interact with few parts of discourse chat.
```ruby
ChatSDK::Message.create_with_stream(raw: "test") do |helper|
5.times do |i|
is_streaming = helper.stream(raw: "more #{i}")
next if !is_streaming
sleep 2
end
end
```
This commit also introduces all the frontend parts:
- messages can now be marked as streaming
- when streaming their content will be updated when a new content is appended
- a special UI will be showing (a blinking indicator)
- a cancel button allows the user to stop the streaming, when cancelled `helper.stream(...)` will return `false`, and the plugin can decide exit early
In certain cases, chat channels may have empty slugs, it happens when:
1. The `slug_generation_method` setting is set to `None`
2. `slug_generation_method` is set to `ASCII` and a channel with
a Unicode name and an empty slug is created (in this case, the code
that creates channels tries to generate a slug and fallbacks to an empty slug)
At the moment, we have a unique index on the `chat_channels.slug` column
which leads to errors when creating several channels with empty slugs
(Discourse is able to create one such channel, but when trying to create
the second one fails because of the unique constraint). This PR fixes that
by adding a `where` condition to the index. Slugs still have to be unique,
but now many channels may have empty slugs.
This fix is similar to the one we made to the category slugs – 7ba914f1e1.
Fixes an issue with delayed rendering of the My Threads tab in chat mobile footer.
Previously we made an ajax request to determine the number of threads a user had before rendering the tab, however it is much faster (and better UX) if we can rely on a site setting for this.
The new chat_threads_enabled site setting is set to true when the site has chat channels with threading enabled.
At the moment, when someone is mentioning a group, or using here or
all mention, we create a chat_mention record per user. What we want
instead is to have special kinds of mentions, so we can create only one
chat_mention record in such cases. This PR implements that.
Note, that such mentions will still have N related notifications, one
notification per a user. We don't expect we'll have performance
problems on the notifications side, but if at some point we do, we
should be able to solve them on the side of notifications
(notifications are handled in jobs, also some little delays with
the notifications are acceptable, so we can make sure notifications
are properly queued, and that processing of every notification is
fast enough to make delays small enough).
The preparation work for this PR was done in fbd24fa, where we make
it possible for one mention to have several related notifications.
A pretty tricky part of this PR is schema and data migration, I've explained
related details inline on the migration files.
This PR is a reworked version of https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/24670.
In chat, we need the ability to have several notifications per `chat_mention`.
Currently, we have one_to_one relationship between `chat_mentions` and `notifications`:
d7a09fb08d/plugins/chat/app/models/chat/mention.rb (L9)
We want to have one_to_many relationship. This PR implements that by introducing
a join table between `chat_mentions` and `notifications`.
The main motivation for this is that we want to solve some performance problems
with mentions that we're having now. Let's say a user sends a message with @ all
in a channel with 50 members, we do two things in this case at the moment:
- create 50 chat_mentions
- create 50 notifications
We don't want to change how notifications work in core, but we want to be more
efficient in chat, and create only 1 `chat_mention` which would link to 50 notifications.
Also note, that on the side of notifications, having a lot of notifications is not so
big problem, because notifications processing can be queued.
Apart from improving performance, this change will make the code design better.
Note that I've marked the old `chat_mention.notification_id` column as ignored, but
I'm not deleting it in this PR. We'll delete it later in https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/24800.
This commit adds a new "My threads" link in sidebar and drawer. This link will open the "/chat/threads" page which contains all threads where the current user is a member. It's ordered by activity (unread and then last message created).
Moreover, the threads list of a channel page is now showing every threads of a channel, and not just the ones where you are a member.
This commit implements drafts for threads by adding a new `thread_id` column to `chat_drafts` table. This column is used to create draft keys on the frontend which are a compound key of the channel and the thread. If the draft is only for the channel, the key will be `c-${channelId}`, if for a thread: `c-${channelId}:t-${threadId}`.
This commit also moves the draft holder from the service to the channel or thread model. The current draft can now always be accessed by doing: `channel.draft` or `thread.draft`.
Other notable changes of this commit:
- moves ChatChannel to gjs
- moves ChatThread to gjs
Group channels will allow users to create channels with a name and invite people. It's possible to add people even after creation of the channel. Removing users is not yet possible but will be added in the near future.
Technically a group channel is `direct_message_channel` with a group attribute set to true on its direct message (chatable). This model might evolve in the future but offers much flexibility for now without having to rely on a complex migration.
The commit essentially consists of:
- a migration to set existing direct message channels with more than 2 users to a group
- a new message creator which allows to search, add members, and create groups
- a new `AddUsersToChannel` service
- a modified `SearchChatable` service
Initial migration and changes to models as well as
changing the following services to update last_message_id:
* Chat::MessageCreator
* Chat::RestoreMessage
* Chat::TrashMessage
The data migration will set the `last_message_id` for all existing
threads and channels in the database.
When we query the thread list as well as the channel,
we look at the last message ID for the following:
* Channel - Sorting DM channels, and channel metadata for the list of channels
* Thread - Last reply details for thread indicators and thread list
Whenever a user opens a channel or marks it read, we now
update the last_viewed_at datetime for that channel membership
record. This is so we will be able to show thread unread indicators
in the channel sidebar that clear independently of the main thread
unread indicators. This unread functionality will follow in another
PR.
Since we created user_chat_thread_memberships in
cc2570f we haven't
yet backfilled it for users who previously sent a message in
in threads -- this migration creates the UserChatThreadMemberships
needed for those threads, making sure the last read message id
is accurate for those participants.
This will enable us to begin work on user tracking
state for a thread so we can show thread-specific
unreads and mentions indicators. In this case are following
the core notification_level paradigm rather than the solution
UserChatChannelMembership went with, and eventually we
will want to refactor the other table to match this as well.
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Similar to 22a55ef0ce,
this commit adds a replies_count to the Chat::Thread
table, which is updated every 15 minutes via PeriodicalUpdates.
This is done so the new thread indicator for the UI can
show the count without intense serializer queries, but
in future we likely want this to update more frequently.
This commit allows the user to set their preference vis-a-vis
the chat icon in the header of the page. There are three options:
- All New (default) - This maintains the existing behaviour where
all new messages in the channel show a blue dot on the icon
- Direct Messages and Mentions - Only show the green dot on the
icon when you are directly messaged or mentioned, the blue dot
is never shown
- Never - Never show any dot on the chat icon, for those who
want tractor-beam-laser-focus
This new table will be used to automatically group replies
for messages into one place. In future additional functionality
will be built around the thread, like pinning messages, changing
the title, etc., the columns are just the main ones needed at first.
The columns are not prefixed with `chat_*` e.g. `chat_channel` since
this is redundant and just adds duplication everywhere, we want to
move away from this generally within chat.
Adds hidden `enable_experimental_chat_threaded_discussions`
setting which will control whether threads show in the UI,
alongside the `ChatChannel.threading_enabled` boolean column,
which does the same. The former is a global switch for this
feature, while the latter can be used to allow single channels
to show this new functionality if the site setting is true.
Neither setting impacts whether `ChatThread` records (which will
be added in a future PR) will be created, they will always be
made regardless.
We've had the UploadReference table for some time now in core,
but it was added after ChatUpload was and chat was just never
moved over to this new system.
This commit changes all chat code dealing with uploads to create/
update/delete/query UploadReference records instead of ChatUpload
records for consistency. At a later date we will drop the ChatUpload
table, but for now keeping it for data backup.
The migration + post migration are the same, we need both in case
any chat uploads are added/removed during deploy.
This commit adds an index for the query which the chat plugin executes
multiple times when preloading user data in `Chat::ChatChannelFetcher.unread_counts`.
Sample query plan from a query I grabbed from one of our production
instance.
Before:
```
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GroupAggregate (cost=10.77..696.67 rows=7 width=16) (actual time=7.735..7.736 rows=0 loops=1)
Group Key: cc.id
-> Nested Loop (cost=10.77..696.54 rows=12 width=8) (actual time=7.734..7.735 rows=0 loops=1)
Join Filter: (cc.id = cm.chat_channel_id)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.56..76.44 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.011..0.037 rows=7 loops=1)
-> Index Only Scan using chat_channels_pkey on chat_channels cc (cost=0.28..22.08 rows=7 width=8) (actual time=0.004..0.014 rows=7 loops=1)
Index Cond: (id = ANY ('{192,300,228,727,8,612,1633}'::bigint[]))
Heap Fetches: 0
-> Index Scan using user_chat_channel_unique_memberships on user_chat_channel_memberships uccm (cost=0.28..7.73 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=1 loops=7)
Index Cond: ((user_id = 1338) AND (chat_channel_id = cc.id))
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on chat_messages cm (cost=10.21..618.98 rows=89 width=12) (actual time=1.096..1.097 rows=0 loops=7)
Recheck Cond: (chat_channel_id = uccm.chat_channel_id)
Filter: ((deleted_at IS NULL) AND (user_id <> 1338) AND (id > COALESCE(uccm.last_read_message_id, 0)))
Rows Removed by Filter: 2085
Heap Blocks: exact=7106
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_chat_messages_on_chat_channel_id_and_created_at (cost=0.00..10.19 rows=270 width=0) (actual time=0.114..0.114 rows=2085 loops=7)
Index Cond: (chat_channel_id = uccm.chat_channel_id)
Planning Time: 0.408 ms
Execution Time: 7.762 ms
(19 rows)
```
After:
```
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GroupAggregate (cost=5.84..367.39 rows=7 width=16) (actual time=0.130..0.131 rows=0 loops=1)
Group Key: cc.id
-> Nested Loop (cost=5.84..367.26 rows=12 width=8) (actual time=0.129..0.130 rows=0 loops=1)
Join Filter: (cc.id = cm.chat_channel_id)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.56..76.44 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.038..0.069 rows=7 loops=1)
-> Index Only Scan using chat_channels_pkey on chat_channels cc (cost=0.28..22.08 rows=7 width=8) (actual time=0.011..0.022 rows=7 loops=1)
Index Cond: (id = ANY ('{192,300,228,727,8,612,1633}'::bigint[]))
Heap Fetches: 0
-> Index Scan using user_chat_channel_unique_memberships on user_chat_channel_memberships uccm (cost=0.28..7.73 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.006..0.006 rows=1 loops=7)
Index Cond: ((user_id = 1338) AND (chat_channel_id = cc.id))
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on chat_messages cm (cost=5.28..289.71 rows=89 width=12) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=0 loops=7)
Recheck Cond: ((chat_channel_id = uccm.chat_channel_id) AND (id > COALESCE(uccm.last_read_message_id, 0)) AND (deleted_at IS NULL))
Filter: (user_id <> 1338)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_chat_messages_on_chat_channel_id_and_id (cost=0.00..5.26 rows=90 width=0) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=0 loops=7)
Index Cond: ((chat_channel_id = uccm.chat_channel_id) AND (id > COALESCE(uccm.last_read_message_id, 0)))
Planning Time: 1.217 ms
Execution Time: 0.188 ms
(17 rows)
```
This commit adds the messages_count column for ChatChannel messages,
which is the number of not-deleted messages in the channel.
This is not updated every time a message is created or deleted in a
channel, so it should not be displayed in the UI.
It is updated eventually via Jobs::ChatPeriodicalUpdates, which
will have additional functions in future after being introduced
here.
Also update these counts for existing channels in a post migration.
The settings tab of each category channel should now present the option to allow or disallow channel wide mentions: @here and @all.
When disallowed, using these mentions in the channel should have no effect.
There must have been a small loophole that allowed
setting the channel slug in the DB which has led to
conflicts in some cases.
This commit fixes the conflicting chat channel
slugs and then changes the channel slug index
to a unique one in the DB.
Sets the chat_allowed_groups to staff (the old default) in the database for
people who already have chat enabled if they did not already change it.
The assumption is that most people who this applies to will be
upgrading from a version that has neither of these two PRs (
the other PR being #19116) to a version that has both of these PRs.
So, for existing site with chat enabled who haven’t set groups, we
want to persist the value which is more likely to match what that are
upgrading from (staff).
People who don’t yet have chat enabled should get the new value (TL1
and staff) when they do enable it.
Follow up to 05b740036e
Since the migration was added as a post migration, we'll try to add the constraint first, causing a NotNullViolation exception.
This only affects sites that were last deployed more than two days ago.
Follow up to 766bcbc684
Makes ChatMessage.last_editor_id and ChatMessageRevision.user_id
NOT NULL since they are always filled in now and the last commit
had a migration to backfill this data.
This commit adds last_editor_id to ChatMessage for parity with Post in
core, as well as adding user_id to the ChatMessageRevision record since
we need to know who is making edits and revisions to messages, in case
in future we want to allow more than just the current user to edit chat
messages. The backfill for data here simply uses the record's creating
user ID, but in future if we allow other people to edit the messages it
will use their ID.
