Commit Graph

27 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Martin Brennan
9762e65758
FEATURE: Add Revise... option for queued post reviewable (#23454)
This commit adds a new Revise... action that can be taken
for queued post reviewables. This will open a modal where
the user can select a Reason from a preconfigured list
(or by choosing Other..., a custom reason) and provide feedback
to the user about their post.

The post will be rejected still, but a PM will also be sent to
the user so they have an opportunity to improve their post when
they resubmit it.
2023-10-13 11:28:31 +10:00
David Taylor
5a003715d3
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to app/* 2023-01-09 14:14:59 +00:00
Loïc Guitaut
26fe047724 DEV: Use AR enums in reviewables related code
This is the first patch of many to replace our custom enums in Ruby by
the ones provided by `ActiveRecord`.
2022-09-22 14:44:27 +02:00
Roman Rizzi
1434fe3021
FIX: Recover from guardian check when deleting reviewable users. (#17949)
Handles edge-case when a user is an admin and has an associated reviewable. Hitting this exception should be rare since we clear the reviewable when
granting staff to the user.
2022-08-16 11:50:06 -03:00
Osama Sayegh
988a175e94
DEV: Add reviewables tab to the new user menu (#17630)
This commit is a subset of the changes proposed in https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-07-28 11:16:33 +03:00
Gerhard Schlager
7c4e2d33fa
SECURITY: Remove auto approval when redeeming an invite (#16974)
This security fix affects sites which have `SiteSetting.must_approve_users`
enabled. There are intentional and unintentional cases where invited
users can be auto approved and are deemed to have skipped the staff approval process.
Instead of trying to reason about when auto-approval should happen, we have decided that
enabling the `must_approve_users` setting going forward will just mean that all new users
must be explicitly approved by a staff user in the review queue. The only case where users are auto
approved is when the `auto_approve_email_domains` site setting is used.

Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
2022-06-02 16:10:48 +02:00
David Taylor
9ddd1f739e
DEV: Update :critical_user_email calls to use strings (#15827)
Symbols are converted to strings anyway, so there is no change in behaviour. The latest version of sidekiq introduced a warning for this.
2022-02-04 23:43:53 +00:00
David Taylor
4b55b59931 DEV: Update core model annotations
Generated using `bin/rake annotate:clean`
2021-07-06 10:11:06 +01:00
Roman Rizzi
4dc8c3c409
FEATURE: Blocking is optional when deleting a user from the review queue. (#13375)
Subclasses must call #delete_user_actions inside build_actions to support user deletion. The method adds a delete user bundle, which has a delete and a delete + block option. Every subclass is responsible for implementing these actions.
2021-06-15 12:35:45 -03:00
Arpit Jalan
f75e1867ff
FIX: do not send rejection emails to auto-deleted reviewable users (#12160)
FIX: add context when user is deleted via auto handle queued reviewable
FIX: do not delete email_log when a user is deleted
2021-02-22 18:37:47 +05:30
Roman Rizzi
aac9e6cb0a
FIX: Don't require a rejection reason if the user is a spammer. (#12141) 2021-02-19 12:57:01 -03:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
06b7c44593
FEATURE: reason to reject user signup (#11700)
Feature for `Must Approve Users` setup. When a user is rejected, a staff member can optionally set a reason for audit purposes. In addition, feedback email can be sent to the user.

Meta: https://meta.discourse.org/t/account-rejection-email/103112/8
2021-01-15 09:43:26 +11:00
Arpit Jalan
34478760b2 Update annotations. 2020-09-01 13:41:04 +05:30
Roman Rizzi
2ee6a615b7
FEATURE: Send suspect users to the review queue (#8811) 2020-01-29 15:38:27 -03:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
427d54b2b0 DEV: Upgrading Discourse to Zeitwerk (#8098)
Zeitwerk simplifies working with dependencies in dev and makes it easier reloading class chains. 

We no longer need to use Rails "require_dependency" anywhere and instead can just use standard 
Ruby patterns to require files.

This is a far reaching change and we expect some followups here.
2019-10-02 14:01:53 +10:00
Guo Xiang Tan
5aed463649 Update annotation. 2019-05-24 12:58:26 +08:00
Robin Ward
e74cd54fc6 REFACTOR: Replace score bonuses with low/med/high priorities
We removed score from the UX so it makes more sense to have sites set
priorities instead of score bonuses.
2019-05-23 11:54:45 -04:00
Sam Saffron
30990006a9 DEV: enable frozen string literal on all files
This reduces chances of errors where consumers of strings mutate inputs
and reduces memory usage of the app.

Test suite passes now, but there may be some stuff left, so we will run
a few sites on a branch prior to merging
2019-05-13 09:31:32 +08:00
Robin Ward
b380ed5282 FEATURE: Claim Reviewables by Topic
This is a feature that used to be present in discourse-assign but is
much easier to implement in core. It also allows a topic to be assigned
without it claiming for review and vice versa and allows it to work with
category group reviewers.
2019-05-09 13:40:36 -04:00
Sam Saffron
3dc4ab905c DEV: annotate models
(also looks like renaming of bigint(8) -> bigint in annotate
which seems fine)
2019-05-03 08:34:12 +10:00
Robin Ward
14f9d40e48 FEATURE: Clarify Reviewable User Actions
"Approve" is now "Approve User" and "Delete" is a dropdown with a choice
that allows you to block.
2019-04-17 11:44:17 -04:00
Robin Ward
ba6d4b2a8d FIX: Better handling for toggling must_approve_users
If you turn it on now, default all users to approved since they were
previously. Also support approving a user that doesn't have a reviewable
record (it will be created first.)

This also includes a refactor to move class method calls to
`DiscourseEvent` into an initializer. Otherwise the load order of
classes makes a difference in the test environment and some settings
might be triggered and others not, randomly.
2019-04-16 15:56:35 -04:00
Robin Ward
a5d9afe397 FEATURE: Include a user's pending posts in the topic view
Also includes a refactor to TopicView's serializer which was not
building our attributes using serializers properly.
2019-04-12 14:25:12 -04:00
Robin Ward
5d99346740 FIX: Always allow us to reject users, even if they are deleted 2019-04-10 11:00:39 -04:00
Robin Ward
111a502231 FIX: Deleting Users should work nicely with Reviewable Users
"Rejecting" a user in the queue is equivalent to deleting them, which
would then making it impossible to review rejected users. Now we store
information about the user in the payload so if they are deleted things
still display in the Rejected view.

Secondly, if a user is destroyed outside of the review queue, it will
now automatically "Reject" that queue item.
2019-04-03 16:42:39 -04:00
Robin Ward
370355d754 FIX: Allow users with posts to be rejected 2019-03-29 13:53:46 -04:00
Robin Ward
b58867b6e9 FEATURE: New 'Reviewable' model to make reviewable items generic
Includes support for flags, reviewable users and queued posts, with REST API
backwards compatibility.

Co-Authored-By: romanrizzi <romanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: jjaffeux <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
2019-03-28 12:45:10 -04:00