## How does this work?
Any time a lint rule is added or changed, you can run `yarn lint:fix` to handle all the auto-fixable situations.
But not all lints are auto-fixable -- for those, lint-to-the-future has tooling to automatically ignore present violations.
An alias has been added for lint-to-the-future to ignore new violations, `yarn lttf:ignore`.
The command will add lint-ignore declarations throughout all the files with present violations, which should then be committed.
An excerpt from lint-to-the-future's [README](https://github.com/mansona/lint-to-the-future#lint-to-the-future-dashboard):
> The point of Lint to the Future is to allow you to progressively update your codebase using new lint rules without overwhelming you with the task. You can easily ignore lint rules using project-based ignores in your config files but that doesn't prevent you from making the same errors in new files.
> We chose to do the ignores on a file basis as it is a perfect balance and it means that the tracking/graphing aspects of Lint to the Future provide you with achievable goals, especially in large codebases.
## How do I view progress?
lint-to-the-future provides graphs of violations-over-time per lint rule in a dashboard format, so we can track how well we're doing at cleaning up the violations.
To view the dashboard locally, run `yarn lint-progress` and visit `http://localhost:8084` (or whatever the port it chose, as it will choose a new port if 8084 is preoccupied)
Also there is a `list` command which shows a JSON object of:
```ts
{
[date: string]: { // yyyy-mm-dd
[pluginName: string]: {
[fileName: string]: string[]; // list of files with violations
}
}
}
```
```bash
yarn lint-to-the-future list --stdout
```
## What about lint-todo?
Lint todo is another system available for both eslint and ember-template-lint that _forces_ folks to "leave things better than they found them" by being transparent / line-specific ignoring of violations.
It was decided that for _this_ project, it made more sense, and would be less disruptive to new contributors to have the ignore declarations explicitly defined in each file (whereas in lint-todo, they are hidden).
To effectively use lint-todo, a whole team needs to agree to the workflow, and in open source, we want "just anyway" to be able to contribute, and throwing surprises at them can deter contributions.
This is a combined work of Martin Brennan, Loïc Guitaut, and Joffrey Jaffeux.
---
This commit implements a base service object when working in chat. The documentation is available at https://discourse.github.io/discourse/chat/backend/Chat/Service.html
Generating documentation has been made as part of this commit with a bigger goal in mind of generally making it easier to dive into the chat project.
Working with services generally involves 3 parts:
- The service object itself, which is a series of steps where few of them are specialized (model, transaction, policy)
```ruby
class UpdateAge
include Chat::Service::Base
model :user, :fetch_user
policy :can_see_user
contract
step :update_age
class Contract
attribute :age, :integer
end
def fetch_user(user_id:, **)
User.find_by(id: user_id)
end
def can_see_user(guardian:, **)
guardian.can_see_user(user)
end
def update_age(age:, **)
user.update!(age: age)
end
end
```
- The `with_service` controller helper, handling success and failure of the service within a service and making easy to return proper response to it from the controller
```ruby
def update
with_service(UpdateAge) do
on_success { render_serialized(result.user, BasicUserSerializer, root: "user") }
end
end
```
- Rspec matchers and steps inspector, improving the dev experience while creating specs for a service
```ruby
RSpec.describe(UpdateAge) do
subject(:result) do
described_class.call(guardian: guardian, user_id: user.id, age: age)
end
fab!(:user) { Fabricate(:user) }
fab!(:current_user) { Fabricate(:admin) }
let(:guardian) { Guardian.new(current_user) }
let(:age) { 1 }
it { expect(user.reload.age).to eq(age) }
end
```
Note in case of unexpected failure in your spec, the output will give all the relevant information:
```
1) UpdateAge when no channel_id is given is expected to fail to find a model named 'user'
Failure/Error: it { is_expected.to fail_to_find_a_model(:user) }
Expected model 'foo' (key: 'result.model.user') was not found in the result object.
[1/4] [model] 'user' ❌
[2/4] [policy] 'can_see_user'
[3/4] [contract] 'default'
[4/4] [step] 'update_age'
/Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/update_age.rb:32:in `fetch_user': missing keyword: :user_id (ArgumentError)
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:202:in `instance_exec'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:202:in `call'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:219:in `call'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:417:in `block in run!'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:417:in `each'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:417:in `run!'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:411:in `run'
from <internal:kernel>:90:in `tap'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:302:in `call'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/spec/services/update_age_spec.rb:15:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
```
Note this commit also slightly changes internal API: channel instead of getChannel and updateCurrentUserChannelNotificationsSettings instead of updateCurrentUserChatChannelNotificationsSettings.
Also destroyChannel takes a second param which is the name confirmation instead of an optional object containing this confirmation. This is to enforce the fact that it's required.
In the future a top level jsdoc config file could be used instead of the hack tempfile, but while it's only an experiment for chat, it's probably good enough.
We have a vendored version of bootbox which has heavily diverged from the original. We do not fetch it from node_modules, and `javascript.rake` does not reference it. Therefore there is no benefit to having it in `package.json`.
We were already compiling the markdown bundle via ember-cli, but that version was only being used in the test environment. This commit improves the implementation, and updates the filename so it's also used in production.
This commit also
- Removes the vendored copy of `markdown-it.js` and fetches from node_modules instead
- Updates `pretty_text.rb` to remove the custom sprockets-manifest-parsing
- Removes `pretty-text-bundle.js`, which was only being used by `pretty_text.rb`
This enforces some ordering rules for properties/methods in native JS classes. Having enforced structure across our codebase will help developers to quickly get their bearings when reading different classes.
The eslint-config-discourse update introduces an enforced ordering of:
```javascript
"order": [
"[static-properties]",
"[static-methods]",
"[injected-services]",
"[injected-controllers]",
"[tracked-properties]",
"[properties]",
"[private-properties]",
"constructor",
"[everything-else]"
]
```
We may wish to introduce more strict ordering of getters/setters/methods in future.
`--production` is already passed through via the `NODE_ENV` environment variable. We can parse `$npm_config_argv` to check whether `--frozen-lockfile` was passed.
Updates markdown-it to v13.0.1
Noteworthy changes:
* `markdownit()` is now available on `globalThis` instead of `window`.
* The `text_collapse` rule was renamed to `fragments_join` which affected the `bbcode-inline` implementation.
* The `linkify` rule was added to the `inline` chain which affected the handling of the `[url]` BBCode. If available, our implementation reuses `link_open` and `link_close` tokens created by linkify in order to prevent duplicate links.
* The rendered HTML for code changed slightly. There's now a linebreak before the `</code>` tag. The tests were adjusted accordingly.
1. Updates puppeteer to x
2. Fixes deprecations:
```
waitFor is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. See https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/issues/6214 for details and how to migrate your code.
```
3. Lints/prettyfies the smoke_test.js file
Note this commit also introduce a new {{d-popover}} component, example usage:
```hbs
{{#d-popover |state|}}
{{d-button label="foo.things" class="d-popover-trigger"}}
<div class="d-popover-content">
Some content
<div>
{{/d-popover}}
```
This also switches to using the NPM package for better build stability. And adds a clearer label in the alert that is displayed to show your current timezone (when changing timezones).
This is now the default in newer node versions. The code that fails is a
workaround for another error :'(
This also upgrades `chrome-launcher` which helpers with debugging.
Now that d5e380e5c1 has been
committed there is nothing in the codebase that uses either
resumable.js or the old backup-uploader component.
R.I.P resumable.js
`puppeteer` includes a full chromium binary, which adds more than 300mb to our node_modules directory in development/test mode (and therefore the `discourse_dev` and `discourse_test` docker images). We already reach out to the system copy of Chrome for our qunit tests, and already have chrome installed in our `discourse_dev`/`discourse_test` docker images, so it's much more efficient to switch to `puppeteer-core` which doesn't include the chromium binary.
* Running the tests only in the ember cli env hid the fact that the pending posts feature wasn't working in the legacy environment
* Tests were using ember-cli-only APIs while there are widely used testing APIs in Discourse that support both ember envs
* `ember-test-selectors` was in both dependencies and devDependencies in discourse/package.json
* `qunit-dom` in package.json was not only unused but also defunct, as it wasn't pulled into the legacy env app
A followup to #14501, and #15128.
Currently when a user creates posts that are moderated (for whatever
reason), a popup is displayed saying the post needs approval and the
total number of the user’s pending posts. But then this piece of
information is kind of lost and there is nowhere for the user to know
what are their pending posts or how many there are.
This patch solves this issue by adding a new “Pending” section to the
user’s activity page when there are some pending posts to display. When
there are none, then the “Pending” section isn’t displayed at all.
This takes the uppy chunking algorithm and combines it with some
form submission from resumable.js for parity with the current
backup controller to make local backup uploads work with uppy.
We can then use this to replace the resumable-upload component
and the resumable.js library from our codebase, once stable.
This is disabled by default, so people using local backups will not
be affected. The enable_experimental_backup_uploader site setting
must be enabled for this to work.
