This new table will be used to automatically group replies
for messages into one place. In future additional functionality
will be built around the thread, like pinning messages, changing
the title, etc., the columns are just the main ones needed at first.
The columns are not prefixed with `chat_*` e.g. `chat_channel` since
this is redundant and just adds duplication everywhere, we want to
move away from this generally within chat.
Adds hidden `enable_experimental_chat_threaded_discussions`
setting which will control whether threads show in the UI,
alongside the `ChatChannel.threading_enabled` boolean column,
which does the same. The former is a global switch for this
feature, while the latter can be used to allow single channels
to show this new functionality if the site setting is true.
Neither setting impacts whether `ChatThread` records (which will
be added in a future PR) will be created, they will always be
made regardless.
We've had the UploadReference table for some time now in core,
but it was added after ChatUpload was and chat was just never
moved over to this new system.
This commit changes all chat code dealing with uploads to create/
update/delete/query UploadReference records instead of ChatUpload
records for consistency. At a later date we will drop the ChatUpload
table, but for now keeping it for data backup.
The migration + post migration are the same, we need both in case
any chat uploads are added/removed during deploy.
This commit adds an index for the query which the chat plugin executes
multiple times when preloading user data in `Chat::ChatChannelFetcher.unread_counts`.
Sample query plan from a query I grabbed from one of our production
instance.
Before:
```
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GroupAggregate (cost=10.77..696.67 rows=7 width=16) (actual time=7.735..7.736 rows=0 loops=1)
Group Key: cc.id
-> Nested Loop (cost=10.77..696.54 rows=12 width=8) (actual time=7.734..7.735 rows=0 loops=1)
Join Filter: (cc.id = cm.chat_channel_id)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.56..76.44 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.011..0.037 rows=7 loops=1)
-> Index Only Scan using chat_channels_pkey on chat_channels cc (cost=0.28..22.08 rows=7 width=8) (actual time=0.004..0.014 rows=7 loops=1)
Index Cond: (id = ANY ('{192,300,228,727,8,612,1633}'::bigint[]))
Heap Fetches: 0
-> Index Scan using user_chat_channel_unique_memberships on user_chat_channel_memberships uccm (cost=0.28..7.73 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=1 loops=7)
Index Cond: ((user_id = 1338) AND (chat_channel_id = cc.id))
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on chat_messages cm (cost=10.21..618.98 rows=89 width=12) (actual time=1.096..1.097 rows=0 loops=7)
Recheck Cond: (chat_channel_id = uccm.chat_channel_id)
Filter: ((deleted_at IS NULL) AND (user_id <> 1338) AND (id > COALESCE(uccm.last_read_message_id, 0)))
Rows Removed by Filter: 2085
Heap Blocks: exact=7106
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_chat_messages_on_chat_channel_id_and_created_at (cost=0.00..10.19 rows=270 width=0) (actual time=0.114..0.114 rows=2085 loops=7)
Index Cond: (chat_channel_id = uccm.chat_channel_id)
Planning Time: 0.408 ms
Execution Time: 7.762 ms
(19 rows)
```
After:
```
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GroupAggregate (cost=5.84..367.39 rows=7 width=16) (actual time=0.130..0.131 rows=0 loops=1)
Group Key: cc.id
-> Nested Loop (cost=5.84..367.26 rows=12 width=8) (actual time=0.129..0.130 rows=0 loops=1)
Join Filter: (cc.id = cm.chat_channel_id)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.56..76.44 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.038..0.069 rows=7 loops=1)
-> Index Only Scan using chat_channels_pkey on chat_channels cc (cost=0.28..22.08 rows=7 width=8) (actual time=0.011..0.022 rows=7 loops=1)
Index Cond: (id = ANY ('{192,300,228,727,8,612,1633}'::bigint[]))
Heap Fetches: 0
-> Index Scan using user_chat_channel_unique_memberships on user_chat_channel_memberships uccm (cost=0.28..7.73 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.006..0.006 rows=1 loops=7)
Index Cond: ((user_id = 1338) AND (chat_channel_id = cc.id))
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on chat_messages cm (cost=5.28..289.71 rows=89 width=12) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=0 loops=7)
Recheck Cond: ((chat_channel_id = uccm.chat_channel_id) AND (id > COALESCE(uccm.last_read_message_id, 0)) AND (deleted_at IS NULL))
Filter: (user_id <> 1338)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_chat_messages_on_chat_channel_id_and_id (cost=0.00..5.26 rows=90 width=0) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=0 loops=7)
Index Cond: ((chat_channel_id = uccm.chat_channel_id) AND (id > COALESCE(uccm.last_read_message_id, 0)))
Planning Time: 1.217 ms
Execution Time: 0.188 ms
(17 rows)
```
This commit adds the messages_count column for ChatChannel messages,
which is the number of not-deleted messages in the channel.
This is not updated every time a message is created or deleted in a
channel, so it should not be displayed in the UI.
It is updated eventually via Jobs::ChatPeriodicalUpdates, which
will have additional functions in future after being introduced
here.
Also update these counts for existing channels in a post migration.
The settings tab of each category channel should now present the option to allow or disallow channel wide mentions: @here and @all.
When disallowed, using these mentions in the channel should have no effect.
There must have been a small loophole that allowed
setting the channel slug in the DB which has led to
conflicts in some cases.
This commit fixes the conflicting chat channel
slugs and then changes the channel slug index
to a unique one in the DB.
Sets the chat_allowed_groups to staff (the old default) in the database for
people who already have chat enabled if they did not already change it.
The assumption is that most people who this applies to will be
upgrading from a version that has neither of these two PRs (
the other PR being #19116) to a version that has both of these PRs.
So, for existing site with chat enabled who haven’t set groups, we
want to persist the value which is more likely to match what that are
upgrading from (staff).
People who don’t yet have chat enabled should get the new value (TL1
and staff) when they do enable it.
Follow up to 05b740036e
Since the migration was added as a post migration, we'll try to add the constraint first, causing a NotNullViolation exception.
This only affects sites that were last deployed more than two days ago.
Follow up to 766bcbc684
Makes ChatMessage.last_editor_id and ChatMessageRevision.user_id
NOT NULL since they are always filled in now and the last commit
had a migration to backfill this data.
This commit adds last_editor_id to ChatMessage for parity with Post in
core, as well as adding user_id to the ChatMessageRevision record since
we need to know who is making edits and revisions to messages, in case
in future we want to allow more than just the current user to edit chat
messages. The backfill for data here simply uses the record's creating
user ID, but in future if we allow other people to edit the messages it
will use their ID.
