What does this change do?
This change is a continuation of
2191b879c6 and adds an input filter to the
edit sidebar categories modal which the user can use to filter through
the list of categories by the category's name.
Note that if a child category is being shown, all of its ancestors will
be shown even if the names of the ancestors do not match the given
filter. This is to ensure that we continue to display the hierarchy of a
child category even if the parent category does not match the filter.
When a user chooses to move a topic/message to an existing topic/message, they can now opt to merge the posts chronologically (using a checkbox in the UI).
What is the problem?
This is a follow up to 4cca7de22d. In the
commit, CSS was used to disable the collapsing of sections in the header
dropdown navigation menu when the `navigation_menu` site setting is set
to `header dropdown`. However, using CSS is not the correct approach as
the underlying code is still marking the section as collapsable which
means that the sections will still be displayed as collapsed with no way
to "uncollapse" if the local store has already marked the section as
collapsed.
What is the fix?
This commit removes the usage of CSS to hide the collapsabe button and
instead correctly marks the section as not collapsable in the code.
- Update welcome topic copy
- Edit the welcome topic automatically when the title or description changes
- Remove “Create your Welcome Topic” banner/CTA
- Add "edit welcome topic" user tip
There seems to be a breakpoint around 1260px width. When the window is narrower than that breakpoint, the “new or updated topics” banner seems to overlap the list below it.
* UX: replace highlight vars in popup menu
* UX: replace highlight vars in autcomplete
* UX: replace highlight vars in menu-panel
* UX: update style guide
* UX: bulk replace highlight vars in various small appearances
Behavior should be very similar but the code is simplified and it should fix various bugs where the card was showing out of screen even if we had available space.
In an effort to modernize our codebase to the latest Ember version we have selected the Topic Timeline as a candidate to be refactored. The topic timeline component was originally built with `Widgets` and this PR will upgrade it to `Glimmer Components`.
The refactored timeline is hidden by default behind a group flag, `SiteSetting.enable_experimental_topic_timeline_groups`. Being part of a group included in this site setting will make the new timeline available for testing.
## Other points of interest
This PR introduces a `Draggable Modifier` available to all components, which will take the place of the existing _drag functionality_ exclusive to widgets.
It can be included like so:
```
{{draggable didStartDrag=@didStartDrag didEndDrag=@didEndDrag dragMove=@dragMove }}
```
While updating all user pages to use the new horizontal, scrollable user
page navigation, we've inadvertently broken the interface for plugins which rely on the
`user-main-nav` plugin outlet to extend the user profile page. Such
plugins usually add a new user profile page with the following
template structure which is copied from Discourse core before the user
page navigation redesign:
```
{{#d-section pageClass="..." class="user-secondary-navigation" scrollTop=false}}
{{#mobile-nav class="..." desktopClass="action-list nav-stacked"}}
...
{{/mobile-nav}}
{{/d-section}}
<section class="user-content">
{{outlet}}
</section>
```
This commit seeks to add backwards compatibility in terms of the styling
of the interface such that even if the old template structure is used,
it would not look completely broken.
This commit introduces an icon to all links in the sidebar. If an icon has not been configured, we will fall back to a generic "link" icon. As part of this commit, we also standardised the size of each prefix to 20px by 20px and set a fix margin. This is to allow sufficient space for text prefixes and image prefixes to be displayed.
Tests have been intentionally left out for now as I don't feel like asserting for the icons will bring much value at this point. Time shall prove me wrong.
Co-authored-by: awesomerobot <kris.aubuchon@discourse.org>
