This table holds associations between uploads and other models. This can be used to prevent removing uploads that are still in use.
* DEV: Create upload_references
* DEV: Use UploadReference instead of PostUpload
* DEV: Use UploadReference for SiteSetting
* DEV: Use UploadReference for Badge
* DEV: Use UploadReference for Category
* DEV: Use UploadReference for CustomEmoji
* DEV: Use UploadReference for Group
* DEV: Use UploadReference for ThemeField
* DEV: Use UploadReference for ThemeSetting
* DEV: Use UploadReference for User
* DEV: Use UploadReference for UserAvatar
* DEV: Use UploadReference for UserExport
* DEV: Use UploadReference for UserProfile
* DEV: Add method to extract uploads from raw text
* DEV: Use UploadReference for Draft
* DEV: Use UploadReference for ReviewableQueuedPost
* DEV: Use UploadReference for UserProfile's bio_raw
* DEV: Do not copy user uploads to upload references
* DEV: Copy post uploads again after deploy
* DEV: Use created_at and updated_at from uploads table
* FIX: Check if upload site setting is empty
* DEV: Copy user uploads to upload references
* DEV: Make upload extraction less strict
This reverts one of the changes introduced just now in:
27d7b0c6de
I don't think we need this `activated_not_suspended_not_staged` scope
because we can just compose it ourselves via method chaining like
`User.activated.not_suspended.not_staged`.
This commit introduces a new site setting: `block_hotlinked_media`. When enabled, all attempts to hotlink media (images, videos, and audio) will fail, and be replaced with a linked placeholder. Exceptions to the rule can be added via `block_hotlinked_media_exceptions`.
`download_remote_image_to_local` can be used alongside this feature. In that case, hotlinked images will be blocked immediately when the post is created, but will then be replaced with the downloaded version a few seconds later.
This implementation is purely server-side, and does not impact the composer preview.
Technically, there are two stages to this feature:
1. `PrettyText.sanitize_hotlinked_media` is called during `PrettyText.cook`, and whenever new images are introduced by Onebox. It will iterate over all src/srcset attributes in the post HTML and check if they're allowed. If not, the attributes will be removed and replaced with a `data-blocked-hotlinked-src(set)` attribute
2. In the `CookedPostProcessor`, we iterate over all `data-blocked-hotlinked-src(set)` attributes and check whether we have a downloaded version of the media. If yes, we update the src to use the downloaded version. If not, the entire media element is replaced with a placeholder. The placeholder is labelled 'external media', and is a link to the offsite media.
* FIX: Email Send post has already been taken error
Adding a failing test first before coming up with a good solution.
Related: 357011eb3b
The above commit changed
```
PostReplyKey.find_or_create_by_safe!
```
to
```
PostReplyKey.create_or_find_by!
```
But I don't think it is working as a 1-1 replacement because of the
`Validation failed: Post has already been taken` error we are receiving
with this change. Also we need to make sure we don't re-introduce any
concurrency issues.
Reported: https://meta.discourse.org/t/224706/13
* Remove rails unique constraint and rely on db index
I believe this is what is causing `create_or_find_by!` to fail. Because
we have a unique constraint in the db I think we can remove this rails
unique constraint?
* clean up spec wording
This commit resolves a bug where users are not auto approved based on
`SiteSetting.auto_approve_email_domains` when
`SiteSetting.must_approve_users` has been enabled.
When a site has `SiteSetting.invite_only` enabled, we create a
`ReviewableUser`record when activating a user if the user is not
approved. Therefore, we need to approve the user when redeeming an
invite.
There are some uncertainties surrounding why a `ReviewableRecord` is
created for a user in an invites only site but this commit does not seek
to address that.
Follow-up to 7c4e2d33fa
This security fix affects sites which have `SiteSetting.must_approve_users`
enabled. There are intentional and unintentional cases where invited
users can be auto approved and are deemed to have skipped the staff approval process.
Instead of trying to reason about when auto-approval should happen, we have decided that
enabling the `must_approve_users` setting going forward will just mean that all new users
must be explicitly approved by a staff user in the review queue. The only case where users are auto
approved is when the `auto_approve_email_domains` site setting is used.
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
Previously this mapping of **cooked** images was only being run for oneboxes. Now it runs for all images, so we can transform hotlinked images without needing to immediately update `raw`
This commit migrates all bookmarks to be polymorphic (using the
bookmarkable_id and bookmarkable_type) columns. It also deletes
all the old code guarded behind the use_polymorphic_bookmarks setting
and changes that setting to true for all sites and by default for
the sake of plugins.
No data is deleted in the migrations, the old post_id and for_topic
columns for bookmarks will be dropped later on.
- Only validate if custom_fields are loaded, so that we don't trigger a db query
- Only validate public user fields, not all custom_fields
This commit also reverts the unrelated spec changes in ba148e08, which were required to work around these issues
Currently we don’t apply watched words to custom user fields nor user
profile fields.
This led to users being able to use blocked words in their bio, location
or some custom user fields.
This patch addresses this issue by adding some validations so it’s not
possible anymore to save the User model or the UserProfile model if they
contain blocked words.
This allows the category_id filter for the bookmark
report to work with polymorphic bookmarks. Honestly this
is a little hardcode-y at the moment but until we go and
make this report a lot more flexible with more filters
I don't think it's worth the work to add extra interfaces
to RegisteredBookmarkable and BaseBookmarkable to make
this more flexible. This is enough for now.
We have not used anything related to bookmarks for PostAction
or UserAction records since 2020, bookmarks are their own thing
now. Deleting all this is just cleaning up old cruft.
Latest redis interoduces a block form of multi / pipelined, this was incorrectly
passed through and not namespaced.
Fix also updates logster, we held off on upgrading it due to missing functions
A bit of a mixed bag, this addresses several edge areas of bookmarks and makes them compatible with polymorphic bookmarks (hidden behind the `use_polymorphic_bookmarks` site setting). The main ones are:
* ExportUserArchive compatibility
* SyncTopicUserBookmarked job compatibility
* Sending different notifications for the bookmark reminders based on the bookmarkable type
* Import scripts compatibility
* BookmarkReminderNotificationHandler compatibility
This PR also refactors the `register_bookmarkable` API so it accepts a class descended from a `BaseBookmarkable` class instead. This was done because we kept having to add more and more lambdas/properties inline and it was very messy, so a factory pattern is cleaner. The classes can be tested independently as well.
Some later PRs will address some other areas like the discourse narrative bot, advanced search, reports, and the .ics endpoint for bookmarks.
We're adding this column now in preparation for a future commit(s) that will
redesign the avatar/notifications menu. The reason the column is added in a
separate commit is because the redesign changes are going to be complex with a
high risk of getting (temporarily) reverted and if they included a database
migration, they wouldn't revert cleanly/easily.
Internal ticket: t65045.
When a user views a topic that contains a topic timer to publish to a
restricted category, an error occurs on the client side because the user
does not have access to information about the category.
This commit fixes it such that the topic timer is not shown to the user
if the user does not have access to the category.
On some installations, this would fail with 'index row size exceeds btree version 4 maximum'. This commit replaces the (post_id, url)` index with a `(post_id, md5(url))` index, which is much more space efficient.
This will make future changes to the 'pull hotlinked images' system easier. This commit should not introduce any functional change.
For now, the old post_custom_field data is kept in the database. This will be dropped in a future commit.
This commit introduces a new site setting: `use_name_for_username_suggestions` (default true)
Admins can disable it if they want to stop using Name values when generating usernames for users. This can be useful if you want to keep real names private-by-default or, when used in conjunction with the `use_email_for_username_and_name_suggestions` setting, you would prefer to use email-based username suggestions.
* hidden siteSetting to enable experimental sidebar
* user preference to enable experimental sidebar
* `experimental_sidebar_enabled` attribute for current user
* Empty glimmer component for Sidebar
We were calling `dup` on the hash and using that to check for changes. However, we were not duplicating the values, so changes to arrays or nested hashes would not be detected.
This pull request follows on from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/16308. This one does the following:
* Changes `BookmarkQuery` to allow for querying more than just Post and Topic bookmarkables
* Introduces a `Bookmark.register_bookmarkable` method which requires a model, serializer, fields and preload includes for searching. These registered `Bookmarkable` types are then used when validating new bookmarks, and also when determining which serializer to use for the bookmark list. The `Post` and `Topic` bookmarkables are registered by default.
* Adds new specific types for Post and Topic bookmark serializers along with preloading of associations in `UserBookmarkList`
* Changes to the user bookmark list template to allow for more generic bookmarkable types alongside the Post and Topic ones which need to display in a particular way
All of these changes are gated behind the `use_polymorphic_bookmarks` site setting, apart from the .hbs changes where I have updated the original `UserBookmarkSerializer` with some stub methods.
Following this PR will be several plugin PRs (for assign, chat, encrypt) that will register their own bookmarkable types or otherwise alter the bookmark serializers in their own way, also gated behind `use_polymorphic_bookmarks`.
This commit also removes `BookmarkQuery.preloaded_custom_fields` and the functionality surrounding it. It was added in 0cd502a558 but only used by one plugin (discourse-assign) where it has since been removed, and is now used by no plugins. We don't need it anymore.
Previously, 'crop' would resize the image to have the requested width, then crop the height to the requested value. This works when cropping images vertically, but not when cropping them horizontally.
For example, trying to crop a 500x500 image to 200x500 was actually resulting in a 200x200 image. Having an OptimizedImage with width/height columns mismatching the actual OptimizedImage width/height causes some unusual issues.
This commit ensures that a call to `OptimizedImage.crop(from, to, width, height)` will always return an image of the requested width/height. The `w x h^` syntax defines minimum width/height, while maintaining aspect ratio.
This commit fixes two issues at play. The first was introduced
in f6c852b (or maybe not introduced
but rather revealed). When a user posted a new message in a topic,
they received the unread topic tracking state MessageBus message,
and the Unread (X) indicator was incremented by one, because with the
aforementioned perf commit we "guess" the correct last read post
for the user, because we no longer calculate individual users' read
status there. This meant that every time a user posted in a topic
they tracked, the unread indicator was incremented. To get around
this, we can just exclude the user who created the post from the
target users of the unread state message.
The second issue was related to the private message topic tracking
state, and was somewhat similar. Whenever a user created a new private
message, the New (X) indicator was incremented, and could not be
cleared until the page was refreshed. To solve this, we just don't
update the topic state for the user when the new_topic tracking state
message comes through if the user who created the topic is the
same as the current user.
cf. https://meta.discourse.org/t/bottom-of-topic-shows-there-is-1-unread-remaining-when-there-are-actually-0-unread-topics-remaining/220817
Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to
use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a
natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it
possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider.
The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA
support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA,
it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each
one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all
the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish.
To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to
implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once
you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to
include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse.
When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their
2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once
they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and
the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods
enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will
contain `no_2fa_methods=true`.
You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user
can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse.
This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that
will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that
you've redirected to Discourse.
Internal ticket: t62183.
