Removes chat-specific changes from dfc947a97d, and adds `preventScroll: true` to prevent timing issues between the emoji picker being brought into the viewport and being focussed.
The following test is flakey. We don't care about the order because we check if the tags are being sent.
```
Failure/Error: measurement = Benchmark.measure { example.run }
expected: ["tag4", "tag5"]
got: ["tag5", "tag4"]
(compared using ==)
```
Create a topic can fail in many different ways and we don't want this to impact the rest of the application, the call will now be wrapped in a begin/rescue block and log an error if it fails.
Previous to this change there is no clean way to apply keyboard shortcuts
to things such as "add poll" and other hidden options in the toolbar
This allows shortcuts to be specified similar to how they are on the toolbar
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Now that `ActiveRecord` relations are properly handled in a `model`
step, putting this step back will allow the service to stops its
execution if there are no users to be removed without calling the pretty
big SQL query contained in the `CalculateMembershipsForRemoval` action.
When we use CTRL/CMD + K to search, on the server we run 4 queries:
- 1 for users
- 1 for groups
- 1 for category channels
- 1 for direct message channels
The server returns up to 10 results per type and the client concatenate all the results (in the order I described) and then takes the first 10 or so.
Let's say you've had 1:1s with john1, john2, and john3. Searching for “john” would return all the johns as “users”. It doesn’t make sense to also return them as 1:1 dms.
That’s what this fixes. When the search returns some users, we skip all 1:1s because we assume they will show up as the results of the “users” query.
We’ll always return matching direct messages with more than 2 users (aka. “group chats”). All 3 other queries (users, groups, and category channels) are unaffected.
Internal ref - t/136079
This patch allows using an AR relation as a model in services without
fetching associated records. It will just check if the relation is empty
or not. In the former case, the execution will stop at that point, as
expected.
This commit introduces a new frontend API to add custom items to the "Site activity" section in the new /about page. The new API is called `addAboutPageActivity` and it works along side the `register_stat` serve-side API which serializes the data that the frontend API consumes. More details of how the two APIs work together is in the JSDoc comment above the API function definition.
Internal topic: t/128545/9.
This commit improves the hilight-ing of mentions in posts and chat messages.
- `@here` and `@all` will generate a `<a class="mention --wide">`
- bots will generate a `<a class="mention --bot">`
- current user will generate a `<a class="mention --current">`
To achieve this change the following value transformer has been added: "mentions-class". It will be run in posts and chat messages after the mention is rendered.
A bug were bots were not considered in mentioned users has also been fixed as part of this PR.
This is a variation on bc3e8a9963cf9a64d114ec751c875025af169690, which was reverted due to issues on iOS. Safari's "in response to user action" check cannot follow the `runAfterFramePaint` chain of interaction -> requestAnimationFrame -> messageChannel, and so some sensitive browser APIs (e.g. clipboard, upload, etc.) were blocked.
This commit is similar, but uses `next()` instead of `runAfterFramePaint()`. The result seems the same, but doesn't have the same issue on iOS.
The chat-emoji-picker change was required to resolve a test failure. The emoji picker has never closed-on-scroll on desktop, so there is no user-facing change in behavior.
This is a follow-up to 671f40ce07 and
ed11ee9d05.
While the optimisations in the previous commits were sound, it did not
resolve the memory bloat we were seeing. It turns out that we call
`.blank?` on the model's result if the model has not been marked
optional. The problem with this is that if the model returns an
ActiveRecord relation, calling `.blank?` on the relation basically loads
everything into memory.
Therefore, this commit removes `users` as a model in the since it really isn't
a model but just a relation.
This is a follow up to ed11ee9d05.
In `Chat::AutoRemove::HandleCategoryUpdated`, we are currently loading
the related users record in batches and then handing it off to
`Chat::Action::CalculateMembershipsForRemoval.call`. However, we are
still seeing memory spike as a result of this.
This commit eliminates the allocation of `User` ActiveRecord objects until
absolutely necessary. `Chat::Action::CalculateMembershipsForRemoval.call` has been
updated to accept an ActiveRecord relation instead which allows us to
avoid the ActiveRecord allocations.
This change delays the notify watching job to allow time for message to be marked as seen within chat.
Without a slight delay the job fires straight away and often means that messages are seen on screen but the user also receives a notification due to Chat::Notifier.user_has_seen_message? returning false.
This commit seeks to reduce the memory footprint of `Chat::AutoRemove::HandleCategoryUpdated.call`
by optimizing the
`Chat::AutoRemove::HandleCategoryUpdated#remove_users_without_channel_permission` method which was
loading all the ActiveRecord users objects into memory at once. This
change updates the method call to load the ActiveRecord user objects in
batches instead.
See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/cant-edit-topic-with-poll-bug-occurs/320845?u=merefield
When the Poll is set to "results ON_CLOSE", vote numbers for each option are only streamed to the browser when the vote is Closed. It is therefore not possible to render the Results.
The current issue is that when you refresh the page, for those that have voted the default view is results. For this type of poll this should NOT happen. The Results view in this mode should not be possible to see until closure, even for the Author.
Because the votes are not yet serialised when this kind of poll remains open, an attempt to display results causes a JavaScript exception and in any case does not make logical sense.
So the fix here is making sure the default view, for Polls that have results on close, is the voting view until the Poll is Closed.
I've added a test to cover this scenario.
Additionally, this requires a refresh of the page when the poll admin actions a Close to ensure the results are serialized in.
Initially, the poll results display a maximum of 25 voters per option. If the number of voters exceeds this limit, a button allows users to load additional pages of voters.
When this button is clicked, a method is called to retrieve the additional voter information. However, there was a bug where the local tracked object was not properly updated for ranked choice voters. This is due to the existence of two attributes per option: one indicating whether new data is currently loading, and the other containing the list of voters.
Instead of updating the entire option key with the voters list, the fix requires updating the voters attribute only.
This is a small but critical change. The pull request also includes a new test that significantly increases coverage, addressing this issue and beyond.
Adds a new statistics (hidden from the UI, but available via the API) that tracks daily participating users.
A user is considered as "participating" if they have
- Reacted to a post
- Replied to a topic
- Created a new topic
- Created a new PM
- Sent a chat message
- Reacted to a chat message
Internal ref - t/131013
* FEATURE: Change tags sent in topic_tags_changed trigger in discourse_automation
Before, it was sending the old tags and the current tags in topic.
Now, it sends the removed tags and the added tags in the topic.
* DEV: update `missing_tags` to be `removed_tags`
* DEV: add spacing for better readability
This outlet is rendered before the content of the drawer. The `currentRouteName` is accessible in `outletArgs`.
Example:
```gjs
export default class Test extends Component {
<template>
{{#if (eq @outletArgs.currentRouteName "chat.browse")}}
the browse page
{{/if}}
</template>
}
```
What does this add?
===================
This PR adds an extra button to the poll to show the absolute number of
people who voted for each option. This button will only be added for
the single/multi-select bar chart.
Related meta topic: https://meta.discourse.org/t/absolute-numbers-in-polls/32771
