In #20135 we prevented invalid inputs from being accepted in category setting form fields on the front-end. We didn't do anything on the back-end at that time, because we were still discussing which path we wanted to take. Eventually we decided we want to move this to a new CategorySetting model.
This PR moves the require_topic_approval and require_reply_approval from custom fields to the new CategorySetting model.
This PR is nearly identical to #20580, which migrated num_auto_bump_daily, but since these are slightly more sensitive, they are moved after the previous one is verified.
Previous to this change when both `normalize_emails` and `hide_email_address_taken`
is enabled the expected `account_exists` email was only sent on exact email
matches.
This expands it so it also sends an email to the canonical email owner.
Why this change?
Currently, we do not have an easy way to test themes and theme components
using Rails system tests. While we support QUnit acceptance tests for
themes and theme components, QUnit acceptance tests stubs out the server
and setting up the fixtures for server responses is difficult and can lead to a
frustrating experience. System tests on the other hand allow authors to
set up the test fixtures using our fabricator system which is much
easier to use.
What does this change do?
In order for us to allow authors to run system tests with their themes
installed, we are adding a `upload_theme` helper that is made available
when writing system tests. The `upload_theme` helper requires a single
`directory` parameter where `directory` is the directory of the theme
locally and returns a `Theme` record.
When using ember-template-tag (.gjs), templates are much more interlinked with the JS file they're defined in. Therefore, attempting to override their template with a 'non-strict-mode' template doesn't make sense, and will likely lead to problems.
This commit skips any such overrides, and introduces a clear console warning. In theme/plugin tests, an error will be thrown during app boot.
Going forward, we aim to provide alternative APIs to achieve the customizations people currently implement with template overrides. (e.g. https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/23110)
While it's generally not recommended from a UX perspective, the DModal system is intended to allow multiple modals to be rendered simultaneously when using the declarative API. This wasn't working because `{{#in-element` was configured to replace the content of the container rather than append a new modal.
This commit fixes that and adds a test for the functionality.
By default this is linked to the `tests` boolean, which we disabled for Embroider builds in 96674859. We want deprecation-workflow features to be available in production builds, so let's enable it unconditionally.
Until now, we have allowed testing themes in production environments via `/theme-qunit`. This was made possible by hacking the ember-cli build so that it would create the `tests.js` bundle in production. However, this is fundamentally problematic because a number of test-specific things are still optimized out of the Ember build in production mode. It also makes asset compilation significantly slower, and makes it more difficult for us to update our build pipeline (e.g. to introduce Embroider).
This commit removes the ability to run qunit tests in production builds of the JS app when the Embdroider flag is enabled. If a production instance of Discourse exists exclusively for the development of themes (e.g. discourse.theme-creator.io) then they can add `EMBER_ENV: development` to their `app.yml` file. This will build the entire app in development mode, and has a significant performance impact. This must not be used for real production sites.
This commit also refactors many of the request specs into system specs. This means that the tests are guaranteed to have Ember assets built, and is also a better end-to-end test than simply checking for the presence of certain `<script>` tags in the HTML.
Mixins are considered deprecated by Ember, and cannot be applied to modern framework objects. Also, the coupling they introduce can make things very difficult to refactor.
This commit takes the state/logic from BulkTopicSelection and turns it into a helper object. This avoids it polluting any controllers/components its included in.
In future, the entire helper object can be passed down to child components so that they don't need to lookup controllers using the resolver. Those kinds of changes would involve changing some very heavily-overridden templates, so they are not included in this PR. It will likely be done as part of the larger refactor in https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/22622.
- Add data-embroider-ignore to all script tags which are not currently being compiled by embroider
- Ensure all remaining script tags are wrapped in `<discourse-chunked-script>` so that Rails will follow any renames which Embroider makes (e.g. when it adds fingerprints to filenames)
Discourse core now builds and runs with Embroider! This commit adds
the Embroider-based build pipeline (`USE_EMBROIDER=1`) and start
testing it on CI.
The new pipeline uses Embroider's compat mode + webpack bundler to
build discourse code, and leave everything else (admin, wizard,
markdown-it, plugins, etc) exactly the same using the existing
Broccoli-based build as external bundles (<script> tags), passed
to the build as `extraPublicTress` (which just means they get
placed in the `/public` folder).
At runtime, these "external" bundles are glued back together with
`loader.js`. Specifically, the external bundles are compiled as
AMD modules (just as they were before) and registered with the
global `loader.js` instance. They expect their `import`s (outside
of whatever is included in the bundle) to be already available in
the `loader.js` runtime registry.
In the classic build, _every_ module gets compiled into AMD and
gets added to the `loader.js` runtime registry. In Embroider,
the goal is to do this as little as possible, to give the bundler
more flexibility to optimize modules, or omit them entirely if it
is confident that the module is unused (i.e. tree-shaking).
Even in the most compatible mode, there are cases where Embroider
is confident enough to omit modules in the runtime `loader.js`
registry (notably, "auto-imported" non-addon NPM packages). So we
have to be mindful of that an manage those dependencies ourselves,
as seen in #22703.
In the longer term, we will look into using modern features (such
as `import()`) to express these inter-dependencies.
This will only be behind a flag for a short period of time while we
perform some final testing. Within the next few weeks, we intend
to enable by default and remove the flag.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
We have the max_mentions_per_chat_message site settings; when a user tries
to mention more users than allowed, no one gets mentioned.
Chat messages may contain code-blocks with strings that look like mentions:
def foo
@bar + @baz
end
The problem is that the parsing code considers these as real mentions and counts
them when checking the limit. This commit fixes the problem.
`badge.save(["name", "description", "badge_type_id"])` api it was testing isn't a thing anymore.
Also: replaces `assert.expect(0)` with more useful assertions
We have a workaround so that currentUser/siteSettings/appEvents work properly on RestModel instances which are created without an owner. This is not ideal, but fixing this properly is not trivial. This commit improves the workaround to be more robust and support all service injections.
Currently, if the review queue has both a flagged post and a flagged chat message, one of the two will have some of the labels of their actions replaced by those of the other. In other words, the labels are getting mixed up. For example, a flagged chat message might show up with an action labelled "Delete post".
This is happening because when using bundles, we are sending along the actions in a separate part of the response, so they can be shared by many reviewables. The bundles then index into this bag of actions by their ID, which is something generic describing the server action, e.g. "agree_and_delete".
The problem here is the same action can have different labels depending on the type of reviewable. Now that the bag of actions contains multiple actions with the same ID, which one is chosen is arbitrary. I.e. it doesn't distinguish based on the type of the reviewable.
This change adds an additional field to the actions, server_action, which now contains what used to be the ID. Meanwhile, the ID has been turned into a concatenation of the reviewable type and the server action, e.g. post-agree_and_delete.
This still provides the upside of denormalizing the actions while allowing for different reviewable types to have different labels and descriptions.
At first I thought I would prepend the reviewable type to the ID, but this doesn't work well because the ID is used on the server-side to determine which actions are possible, and these need to be shared between different reviewables. Hence the introduction of server_action, which now serves that purpose.
I also thought about changing the way that the bundle indexes into the bag of actions, but this is happening through some EmberJS mechanism, so we don't own that code.
