The JS component definition is in the admin bundle, but the template was in the main bundle. This was identified while attempting to colocate component templates in the discourse/app directory
Having a template-lint-disable comment with whitespace trimming was triggering a message during build, likely due to a bug in the build process.
```
unexpectedly found "! template-lint-disable ~" when slicing source, but expected " template-lint-disable "
```
This commit avoids the problem by moving the template-lint-disable comment outside of the stripped-whitespace area.
This commit is expanding on previous work making everything chat working through an URL.
Improves drawer templates to be all URLs
Implements some kind of router for the drawer
Removes few remaining actions for opening channels
* FIX: do not notify admins on suppressed categories
Avoid notifying admins on categories where they are not explicitly members
in cases where SiteSetting.suppress_secured_categories_from_admin is
enabled.
This helps keep notification stream clean and avoids admins mistakenly
being invited to discussions that should be suppressed
This commit introduces the skeleton of the chat thread UI. The
structure of the components looks like this. Its done this way
so the side panel can be used for other things as well if we wish,
not just for threads:
```
.main-chat-outlet
<ChatLivePane />
<ChatSidePanel>
<-- rendered with {{outlet}} -->
<ChatThread />
</ChatSidePanel>
```
Later on the `ChatThreadList` will be rendered here as well.
Now, when you go to a channel you can open a thread by clicking
on either the Open Thread message action button or by clicking on
the reply indicator. This will take you to a route like `chat/c/:slug/:channelId/t/:threadId`.
This works on mobile as well.
This commit includes basic serializers and routes for threads,
as well as a new `ChatThreadsManager` service in JS that caches
threads for a channel the same way the channel threads manager does.
The chat messages inside the thread are intentionally left out
until a later PR.
**NOTE: These changes are gated behind the site setting enable_experimental_chat_threaded_discussions
and the threading_enabled boolean on a ChatChannel**
Dynamically setting the `layoutName` is not compatible with template colocation. Instead, we can give each field type a dedicated component and make `<UserField` a wrapper which renders the correct implementation.
Dynamically setting `layoutName` is not compatible with template colocation. This commit updates `<CustomHTML` to remove the `custom-html-container.hbs` template, and instead dynamically sets the `layout` property as required. Once the deprecated 'custom hbs' feature is removed, this can be updated to be a regular colocated component template.
We often have the need to use rich HTML in dialog messages (to show lists, icons, etc.). Previously, our only option was to wrap the message in an `htmlSafe()` call. This PR adds the ability to pass a component name and model to the dialog, which means that we can write the HTML in regular Ember components.
Example, whereas previously we would do this:
```
this.dialog.deleteConfirm({
message: htmlSafe(`<li>Some text</li>`),
});
```
instead we can now do this:
```javascript
import SecondFactorConfirmPhrase from "discourse/components/dialog-messages/second-factor-confirm-phrase";
...
this.dialog.deleteConfirm({
title: I18n.t("user.second_factor.disable_confirm"),
bodyComponent: SecondFactorConfirmPhrase,
bodyComponentModel: model,
})
```
The model passed to the component is optional and will be available as `@model` in the Handlebars template.
We’re now using `contract` as the first step and validations for
mandatory parameters have been added.
To simplify specs a bit, we only assert the service contract is run as
expected without testing each validation case. We’re now testing the
contract itself in isolation.
This is a combined work of Martin Brennan, Loïc Guitaut, and Joffrey Jaffeux.
---
This commit implements a base service object when working in chat. The documentation is available at https://discourse.github.io/discourse/chat/backend/Chat/Service.html
Generating documentation has been made as part of this commit with a bigger goal in mind of generally making it easier to dive into the chat project.
Working with services generally involves 3 parts:
- The service object itself, which is a series of steps where few of them are specialized (model, transaction, policy)
```ruby
class UpdateAge
include Chat::Service::Base
model :user, :fetch_user
policy :can_see_user
contract
step :update_age
class Contract
attribute :age, :integer
end
def fetch_user(user_id:, **)
User.find_by(id: user_id)
end
def can_see_user(guardian:, **)
guardian.can_see_user(user)
end
def update_age(age:, **)
user.update!(age: age)
end
end
```
- The `with_service` controller helper, handling success and failure of the service within a service and making easy to return proper response to it from the controller
```ruby
def update
with_service(UpdateAge) do
on_success { render_serialized(result.user, BasicUserSerializer, root: "user") }
end
end
```
- Rspec matchers and steps inspector, improving the dev experience while creating specs for a service
```ruby
RSpec.describe(UpdateAge) do
subject(:result) do
described_class.call(guardian: guardian, user_id: user.id, age: age)
end
fab!(:user) { Fabricate(:user) }
fab!(:current_user) { Fabricate(:admin) }
let(:guardian) { Guardian.new(current_user) }
let(:age) { 1 }
it { expect(user.reload.age).to eq(age) }
end
```
Note in case of unexpected failure in your spec, the output will give all the relevant information:
```
1) UpdateAge when no channel_id is given is expected to fail to find a model named 'user'
Failure/Error: it { is_expected.to fail_to_find_a_model(:user) }
Expected model 'foo' (key: 'result.model.user') was not found in the result object.
[1/4] [model] 'user' ❌
[2/4] [policy] 'can_see_user'
[3/4] [contract] 'default'
[4/4] [step] 'update_age'
/Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/update_age.rb:32:in `fetch_user': missing keyword: :user_id (ArgumentError)
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:202:in `instance_exec'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:202:in `call'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:219:in `call'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:417:in `block in run!'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:417:in `each'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:417:in `run!'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:411:in `run'
from <internal:kernel>:90:in `tap'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/base.rb:302:in `call'
from /Users/joffreyjaffeux/Code/pr-discourse/plugins/chat/spec/services/update_age_spec.rb:15:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
```
Previously, all plugin connector templates would be rendered using the PluginConnector classic component definition. This commit introduces three key changes:
1. PluginOutlets can be passed `@defaultGlimmer={{true}}`, which will cause all connectors to be rendered as highly-performant 'template only glimmer components'. For now, to avoid breaking backwards compatibility, this is only intended for use on newly introduced PluginOutlets.
2. Connector js files can now directly export component definitions. This allows connectors on existing outlets to start using Glimmer components (template-only, or otherwise) straight away. It also makes it much more ergonomic to introduce custom logic to outlets. `shouldRender` continues to be supported (as a static class method).
3. Outlet arguments are now made available as `@outletArgs` in classic, glimmer and template-only-glimmer connectors. In glimmer and template-only-glimmer connectors, this is the only way to access the outlet's arguments. In classic connectors, the old methods still function - `@outletArgs` exists as a path for incremental migration
Fixes migration introduced in a90ad52dff,
some category custom fields like `num_auto_bump_daily` which should be
an integer are actually empty string ''.
Since ad6c028484
in the zeitwork repo which was introduced to discourse/discourse in PR #20253,
the `autoloads` attribute on the loader has been marked `internal`, which means
that it errors if we try to access it directly.
Instead we should access it via the "mangled" version so it is clear
we're accessing an internal property, which is `__autoloads`.
Without this, any time a ruby file is saved the
000-development_reload_warnings.rb initializer will error.
The #pluck_first freedom patch, first introduced by @danielwaterworth has served us well, and is used widely throughout both core and plugins. It seems to have been a common enough use case that Rails 6 introduced it's own method #pick with the exact same implementation. This allows us to retire the freedom patch and switch over to the built-in ActiveRecord method.
There is no replacement for #pluck_first!, but a quick search shows we are using this in a very limited capacity, and in some cases incorrectly (by assuming a nil return rather than an exception), which can quite easily be replaced with #pick plus some extra handling.
This is the first in a multi-part change to move the custom fields to a new table. It includes:
- Adding a new CategorySetting model and corresponding table.
- Populating it with data from the category_custom_fields table.
This change will ensure we enter and subscribe to presence channels on start and will use the correct "change" events from presence channel to update state.
Previously after uploads completed post raw would drift.
If you autocompleted text after the upload stub got replaced it would
insert in the wrong position.
The `Composer - current time` test would sometimes fail due to a
1-second difference. We don't really need per-second fidelity here, the
key thing this needs to test is that the shortcut works and adds today's
date. I have updated the test to reflect that.
