Previously we were checking truthiness in some places, and `== true` in
others. That can lead to some inconsistent UX where the interface says
the email is valid, but account creation fails.
This commit ensures values are boolean when set, and raises an error for
other value types.
If this safety check is triggered, it means the specific auth provider
needs to be updated to pass booleans.
This `if` statement was backwards, such that it was a no-op. This hasn't
caused a problem because clicking an item triggers a page load, which
destroys and recreates the component.
However, we are soon planning to remove the intermediate loading screen,
which means the component will not be removed/recreated.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/177939/202
Includes:
* DEV: Remove external plugin linting (that's covered by CI in their repositories)
* DEV: Move lint stages to a separate workflow (partial de-`if`-ication of workflows)
* DEV: Run CI on `main` branch too
* DEV: Update postgres to 13
* DEV: Update redis to 6.x
Other changes:
* DEV: Remove matrix.os
* DEV: Remove env.BUILD_TYPE
* DEV: Remove env.TARGET
* DEV: Rename `build_types` config option to `build_type`
* DEV: Lowercase `target` and `build_type` names
* DEV: Rename `ci` to `tests`
* DEV: Rename `lint` to `linting`
* DEV: Lower the wizard qunit timeout (30 min -> 10)
* DEV: Ruby version is no longer configurable
* DEV: Run plugin tests only in the `plugins` target
* DEV: Use binstubs where applicable
* DEV: We don't open PRs to `tests-passed`
* FIX: Reduce the time_read threshold to one minute.
Five minutes is too much and could fill the queue with false positives.
* Update spec/jobs/enqueue_suspect_users_spec.rb
Co-authored-by: Arpit Jalan <arpit@techapj.com>
Co-authored-by: Arpit Jalan <arpit@techapj.com>
This is an importer I wrote to restore some users that were
accidentally deleted for being purged as old staged users or old
unactivated users.
It reads from CSV files exported from a discourse sql backup.
* FIX: Subfolder replace should only affect URL prefix
Issue was reported in https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/179504
* DEV: Test subfolder handling in get-url when called twice on the same path
When running an import script there are many site settings that are
changed but we reset them back to where they were originally before the
import. However, there are two settings that we don't roll back:
```
purge_unactivated_users_grace_period_days
purge_deleted_uploads_grace_period_days
```
which could have some unintended consequences.
My first question is do we *really* have to change these settings? I'm
not a huge fan of changing someones settings without them really knowing
they were changed.
If we really do have to change these settings here is my proposed PR
where we don't alter the `purge_unactivated_users_grace_period_days` if
it has been disabled.
As I'm writing this another change we could make is that we don't change
either of these site settings if we detect that they aren't set to the
default values.
The drive behind this PR is that there is a discourse instance which
relies on staged users as part of their workflow and this setting was
changed by accident via the import script causing users to be deleted
that shouldn't have been.
Completing the discobot tutorial gives you ~3m of reading time, so we set the limit at 5m. Additionally, we use an "OR" clause to cover the case when you just scroll through a single topic.
* FIX: optimise MoveNewSinceToTable
Avoids shuffling all ids around to the app (only use min / max)
Ensure the query for boundaries is ordered by user_id
Version 2.8 brings some changes to how address fields are handled and
this commits updates that and should also include a fix which handles
encoded attachment filenames.
The fork contains a bugfix to correctly decode mail attachments.
NewPostManager’s `post_needs_approval_in_its_category` method should allow category group moderators to create topics/reply to topics that where they have appropraite permissions.
(ie, if a user has permission to moderate a post, any posts made by them shouldn’t be sent to moderation)
`UX` is the officially supported prefix per https://meta.discourse.org/t/19392, but sometimes `UI` is used instead. We should still include those commits.
Some users somehow manage to keep a topic open for a very long time that it causes the post read time to exceed the max integer value (2^31 - 1) which causes errors when we try to update the read time in the database to values above the integer limit.
This PR will cap posts read time at 2^31 - 1 to prevent these errors.
The bug was mentioned on meta: https://meta.discourse.org/t/pressing-dismiss-new-doesnt-clear-new-topics/179858
Problem is that sometimes the user has TopicUser records with `last_read_post_number` set as NULL. In that case, the topic is still "new" to them and should be dismissed when they click dismiss button.
In addition, I added that condition to post_migration and bumped the number to fix existing records. Migration is written to be idempotent so it will make no harm to already deployed instances.
Adding a scope from a plugin was broken. This commit fixes it and adds a test.
It also documents the instance method and renames the serialized "id" attribute to "scope_id" to avoid a conflict when the scope also has a parameter with the same name.
