When sending emails out via group SMTP, if we
are sending them to non-staged users we want
to mask those emails with BCC, just so we don't
expose them to anyone we shouldn't. Staged users
are ones that have likely only interacted with
support via email, and will likely include other
people who were CC'd on the original email to the
group.
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
When sending emails out via group SMTP, if we
are sending them to non-staged users we want
to mask those emails with BCC, just so we don't
expose them to anyone we shouldn't. Staged users
are ones that have likely only interacted with
support via email, and will likely include other
people who were CC'd on the original email to the
group.
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
When sending emails out via group SMTP, if we
are sending them to non-staged users we want
to mask those emails with BCC, just so we don't
expose them to anyone we shouldn't. Staged users
are ones that have likely only interacted with
support via email, and will likely include other
people who were CC'd on the original email to the
group.
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
Backports the following:
* 40e8912395
* bbcb69461f
Which were showing an error when users were
trying to claim invites multiple times and
a subsequent follow-up fix.
This commit adds some protections in InviteRedeemer to ensure that email
can never be nil, which could cause issues with inviting the invited
person to private topics since there was an incorrect inner join.
If the email is nil and the invite is scoped to an email, we just use
that invite.email unconditionally. If a redeeming_user (an existing
user) is passed in when redeeming an email, we use their email to
override the passed in email. Otherwise we just use the passed in
email. We now raise an error after all this if the email is still nil.
This commit also adds some tests to catch the private topic fix, and
some general improvements and comments around the invite code.
This commit also includes a migration to delete TopicAllowedUser records
for users who were mistakenly added to topics as part of the invite
redemption process.
Before this commit, there was no way for us to efficiently check an
array of topics for which a user can see. Therefore, this commit
introduces the `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` method which accepts an
array of `Topic#id`s and filters out the ids which the user is not
allowed to see. The `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` method is meant to
maintain feature parity with `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic?` at all
times so a consistency check has been added in our tests to ensure that
`TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` returns the same result as
`TopicGuardian#can_see_topic?`. In the near future, the plan is for us
to switch to `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` completely but I'm not
doing that in this commit as we have to be careful with the performance
impact of such a change.
This method is currently not being used in the current commit but will
be relied on in a subsequent commit.
Adds limits to location and website fields at model and DB level to
match the bio_raw field limits. A limit cannot be added at the DB level
for bio_raw because it is a postgres text field.
The migration here uses version `6.1` instead of `7.0` since `stable`
is not on that version of rails yet, otherwise this is the same as `beta`
apart from also removing the new tests which caused too many conflicts.
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan gxtan1990@gmail.com
In certain situations, a logged in user can redeem an invite with an email that
either doesn't match the invite's email or does not adhere to the email domain
restriction of an invite link. The impact of this flaw is aggrevated
when the invite has been configured to add the user that accepts the
invite into restricted groups.
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
When a site has `SiteSetting.invite_only` enabled, we create a
`ReviewableUser`record when activating a user if the user is not
approved. Therefore, we need to approve the user when redeeming an
invite.
There are some uncertainties surrounding why a `ReviewableRecord` is
created for a user in an invites only site but this commit does not seek
to address that.
Follow-up to 7c4e2d33fa
This security fix affects sites which have `SiteSetting.must_approve_users`
enabled. There are intentional and unintentional cases where invited
users can be auto approved and are deemed to have skipped the staff approval process.
Instead of trying to reason about when auto-approval should happen, we have decided that
enabling the `must_approve_users` setting going forward will just mean that all new users
must be explicitly approved by a staff user in the review queue. The only case where users are auto
approved is when the `auto_approve_email_domains` site setting is used.
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
(Stable backport of 7ed899f)
There is a couple of layers of caching for theme JavaScript in Discourse:
The first layer is the `javascript_caches` table in the database. When a theme
with JavaScript files is installed, Discourse stores each one of the JavaScript
files in the `theme_fields` table, and then concatenates the files, compiles
them, computes a SHA1 digest of the compiled JavaScript and store the results
along with the SHA1 digest in the `javascript_caches` table.
Now when a request comes in, we need to render `<script>` tags for the
activated theme(s) of the site. To do this, we retrieve the `javascript_caches`
records of the activated themes and generate a `<script>` tag for each record.
The `src` attribute of these tags is a path to the `/theme-javascripts/:digest`
route which simply responds with the compiled JavaScript that has the requested
digest.
The second layer is a distributed cache whose purpose is to make rendering
`<script>` a lot more efficient. Without this cache, we'd have to query the
`javascript_caches` table to retrieve the SHA1 digests for every single
request. So we use this cache to store the `<script>` tags themselves so that
we only have to retrieve the `javascript_caches` records of the activated
themes for the first request and future requests simply get the cached
`<script>` tags.
What this commit does it ensures that the SHA1 digest in the
`javascript_caches` table stay the same across compilations by adding an order
by id clause to the query that loads the `theme_fields` records. Currently, we
specify no order when retrieving the `theme_fields` records so the order in
which they're retrieved can change across compilations and therefore cause the
SHA1 to change even though the individual records have not changed at all.
An inconsistent SHA1 digest across compilations can cause the database cache
and the distributed cache to have different digests and that causes the
JavaScript to fail to load (and if the theme heavily customizes the site, it
gives the impression that the site is broken) until the cache is cleared.
This can happen in busy sites when 2 concurrent requests recompile the
JavaScript files of a theme at the same time (this can happen when deploying a
new Discourse version) and request A updates the database cache after request B
did, and request B updates the distributed cache after request A did.
Internal ticket: t60783.
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
Co-authored-by: Osama Sayegh <asooomaasoooma90@gmail.com>
Our group fabrication creates groups with name "my_group_#{n}" where n
is the sequence number of the group being created. However, this can
cause the test to be flaky if and when a group with name `my_group_10`
is created as it will be ordered before
`my_group_9`. This commits makes the group names determinstic to
eliminate any flakiness.
This reverts commit 558bc6b746.
We initialize models as part of the warmup process in production, so this was being logged on every boot. We only want to log if a plugin is actually using the model, so after_save is a safer bet.
Follow up to: 12f041de5d
Probably best to lookup the "everyone" group_id instead of hard-coding
it to `0`. Also now its more clear what this `0` means.
Running `update_from_remote` and `save!` cause a number of side-effects, including instructing all clients to reload CSS files. If there are no changes, then this is wasteful, and can even cause a 'flicker' effect on clients as they reload CSS.
This commit checks if any updates are available before triggering `update_from_remote` / `save!`. This should be much faster, and stop the 'flickering' UX from happening on every themes:update run.
It also improves the output of the command to include the from/to commit hashes, which may be useful for debugging issues. For example:
```
Checking 'Alien Night | A Dark Discourse Theme' for 'default'... already up to date
Checking 'Star Wars' for 'default'... updating from d8a170dd to 66b9756f
Checking 'Media Overlay' for 'default'... already up to date
```
If a model class calls preload_custom_fields twice then
we have to clear this otherwise the fields are cached inside the
already existing proxy and no new ones are added, so when we check
for custom_fields[KEY] an error is likely to occur
This commit makes a more specific N1NotPreLoadedError from
StandardError to raise when a custom field is loaded before
being preloaded, so it is easier to test that this does
not happen from plugins. Also adds the name of the class
trying to load the custom field to the error message.
In the unlikely, but possible, scenario where a user has no email_tokens, and has an invite record for their email address, login would fail. This commit fixes the `Invite` `user_doesnt_already_exist` validation so that it only applies to new invites, or when changing the email address.
This regressed in d8fe0f4199 (based on `git bisect`)
* FIX: Tag watching for everyone tag groups
Tags in tag groups that have permissions set to everyone were not able
to be saved correctly. A user on their preferences page would mark the
tags that they wanted to save, but the watched_tags in the response
would be empty. This did not apply to admins, just regular users. Even
though the watched tags were being saved in the db, the user serializer
response was filtering them out. When a user refreshed their preferences
pages it would show zero watched tags.
This appears to be a regression introduced by:
0f598ca51e
The issue that needed to be fixed is that we don't track the "everyone"
group (which has an id of 0) in the group_users table. This is because
everyone has access to it, so why fill a row for every single user, that
would be a lot. The fix was to update the query to include tag groups
that had permissions set to the "everyone" group (group_id 0).
I also added another check to the existing spec for updating
watched tags for tags that aren't in a tag group so that it checks the
response body. I then added a new spec which updates watched tags for
tags in a tag group which has permissions set to everyone.
* Resolve failing tests
Improve SQL query syntax for including the "everyone" group with the id
of 0.
This commit also fixes a few failing tests that were introduced. It
turns out that the Fabrication of the Tag Group Permissions was faulty.
What happens when creating the tag groups without any permissions is
that it sets the permission to "everyone". If we then follow up with
fabricating a tag group permission on the tag group instead of having a
single permission it will have 2 (everyone + the group specified)! We
don't want this. To fix it I removed the fabrication of tag group
permissions and just set the permissions directly when creating the tag
group.
* Use response.parsed_body instead of JSON.parse
* FIX: Mark invites flash messages as HTML safe.
This change should be safe as all user inputs included in the errors are sanitized before sending it back to the client.
Context: https://meta.discourse.org/t/html-tags-are-explicit-after-latest-update/214220
* If somebody adds a new error message that includes user input and doesn't sanitize it, using html-safe suddenly becomes unsafe again. As an extra layer of protection, we make the client sanitize the error message received from the backend.
* Escape user input instead of sanitizing
The `plugin:pull_compatible_all` task is intended to take incompatible plugins and downgrade them to an earlier version. Problem is, when running the rake task in development/production environments, the plugins have already been activated. If an incompatible plugin raises an error in `plugin.rb` then the rake task will be unable to start.
This commit centralises our LOAD_PLUGINS detection, adds support for LOAD_PLUGINS=0 in dev/prod, and adds a warning to `plugin:pull_compatible_all` if it's run with plugins enabled.
An admin could search for all screened ip addresses in a block by
using wildcards. 192.168.* returned all IPs in range 192.168.0.0/16.
This feature allows admins to search for a single IP address in all
screened IP blocks. 192.168.0.1 returns all IP blocks that match it,
for example 192.168.0.0/16.
* FEATURE: Remove roll up button for screened IPs
* FIX: Match more specific screened IP address first
Having to load `ip_addr` is confusing especially when that file exists
to monkey patch Ruby's `IpAddr` class. Moving it to our freedom patches
folder which is automatically loaded on initialization.
This is a partial revert of 099b679fc5.
`Bookmark#topic_id` and `Bookmark#reminder_type` was dropped in
b22450c7a8 so we need to continue ignoring
the dropped columns so as to ensure a seamless deploy. Otherwise,
ActiveRecord's schema cache will still contain references to
`Bookmark#topic_id` when the column is dropped in a post migration.
It is too close to release of 2.8 for incomplete
feature shenanigans. Ignores and drops the columns and drops
the trigger/function introduced in
e21c640a3c.
Will pick this feature back up post-release.
We are planning on attaching bookmarks to more and
more other models, so it makes sense to make a polymorphic
relationship to handle this. This commit adds the new
columns and backfills them in the bookmark table, and
makes sure that any new bookmark changes fill in the columns
via DB triggers.
This way we can gradually change the frontend and backend
to use these new columns, and eventually delete the
old post_id and for_topic columns in `bookmarks`.
* File.exists? is deprecated and removed in Ruby 3.2 in favor of
File.exist?
* Dir.exists? is deprecated and removed in Ruby 3.2 in favor of
Dir.exist?
The rake task deleted here was added back in Feb 2020
when bookmarks were first converted from PostAction
records, it is no longer needed. The ignored columns
were removed in ed83d7573e.
This commit adds a check that runs regularly as per
2d68e5d942 which tests the
credentials of groups with SMTP or IMAP enabled. If any issues
are found with those credentials a high priority problem is added to the
admin dashboard.
This commit also formats the admin dashboard differently if
there are high priority problems, bringing them to the top of
the list and highlighting them.
The problem will be cleared if the issue is fixed before the next
problem check, or if the group's settings are updated with a valid
credential.
