discourse/app/models/reviewable_score.rb
Roman Rizzi 28d09227f5
FIX: Reload the ReviewableScore types when extending flags (#8740)
ReviewableScore#types extend the PostActionTypes with their own, storing the result inside a class variable. To avoid overwriting an existing flag, we need to calculate the next flag ID using these types instead of the PostAction ones. Since we first call the score types to calculate the id, this list gets memoized, leaving us with an outdated list.

To fix this, we now reload ReviewableScore#types after replacing flags.
2020-01-17 11:59:38 -03:00

133 lines
3.7 KiB
Ruby

# frozen_string_literal: true
class ReviewableScore < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :reviewable
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :reviewed_by, class_name: 'User'
belongs_to :meta_topic, class_name: 'Topic'
# To keep things simple the types correspond to `PostActionType` for backwards
# compatibility, but we can add extra reasons for scores.
def self.types
@types ||= PostActionType.flag_types.merge(
needs_approval: 9
)
end
# When extending post action flags, we need to call this method in order to
# get the latests flags.
def self.reload_types
@types = nil
types
end
def self.statuses
@statuses ||= Enum.new(
pending: 0,
agreed: 1,
disagreed: 2,
ignored: 3
)
end
def self.score_transitions
{
approved: statuses[:agreed],
rejected: statuses[:disagreed],
ignored: statuses[:ignored]
}
end
# Generate `pending?`, `rejected?`, etc helper methods
statuses.each do |name, id|
define_method("#{name}?") { status == id }
self.class.define_method(name) { where(status: id) }
end
def score_type
Reviewable::Collection::Item.new(reviewable_score_type)
end
def took_action?
take_action_bonus > 0
end
def self.calculate_score(user, type_bonus, take_action_bonus)
score = user_flag_score(user) + type_bonus + take_action_bonus
score > 0 ? score : 0
end
# A user's flag score is:
# 1.0 + trust_level + user_accuracy_bonus
# (trust_level is 5 for staff)
def self.user_flag_score(user)
1.0 + (user.staff? ? 5.0 : user.trust_level.to_f) + user_accuracy_bonus(user)
end
# A user's accuracy bonus is:
# if 5 or less flags => 0.0
# if > 5 flags => (agreed flags / total flags) * 5.0
def self.user_accuracy_bonus(user)
user_stat = user&.user_stat
return 0.0 if user_stat.blank? || user.bot?
calc_user_accuracy_bonus(user_stat.flags_agreed, user_stat.flags_disagreed)
end
def self.calc_user_accuracy_bonus(agreed, disagreed)
agreed ||= 0
disagreed ||= 0
total = (agreed + disagreed).to_f
return 0.0 if total <= 5
accuracy_axis = 0.7
percent_correct = agreed / total
positive_accuracy = percent_correct >= accuracy_axis
bottom = positive_accuracy ? accuracy_axis : 0.0
top = positive_accuracy ? 1.0 : accuracy_axis
absolute_distance = positive_accuracy ?
percent_correct - bottom :
top - percent_correct
axis_distance_multiplier = 1.0 / (top - bottom)
positivity_multiplier = positive_accuracy ? 1.0 : -1.0
(absolute_distance * axis_distance_multiplier * positivity_multiplier * (Math.log(total, 4) * 5.0))
.round(2)
end
def reviewable_conversation
return if meta_topic.blank?
Reviewable::Conversation.new(meta_topic)
end
end
# == Schema Information
#
# Table name: reviewable_scores
#
# id :bigint not null, primary key
# reviewable_id :integer not null
# user_id :integer not null
# reviewable_score_type :integer not null
# status :integer not null
# score :float default(0.0), not null
# take_action_bonus :float default(0.0), not null
# reviewed_by_id :integer
# reviewed_at :datetime
# meta_topic_id :integer
# created_at :datetime not null
# updated_at :datetime not null
# reason :string
# user_accuracy_bonus :float default(0.0), not null
#
# Indexes
#
# index_reviewable_scores_on_reviewable_id (reviewable_id)
# index_reviewable_scores_on_user_id (user_id)
#