mirror of
https://github.com/discourse/discourse.git
synced 2024-11-23 13:03:45 +08:00
8eabbdae5c
This PR moves all the upload related functions into a new
ComposerUpload mixin that is extended by the composer-editor
component. This is being done so I can introduce a ComposerUploadUppy
mixin that overrides functions in the regular ComposerUpload mixin,
via a new composer-editor-uppy component that inherits from
ComposerEditor. The proposed structure, which will be in the next PR,
looks like this:
composer-editor-uppy
```javascript
import ComposerEditor from "discourse/components/composer-editor"
import ComposerUploadUppy from "discourse/mixins/composer-upload-uppy"
export default ComposerEditor.extend(ComposerUploadUppy, {
layoutName: "components/composer-editor"
});
```
This way the new composer-editor is a dumb component purely used for
testing uppy safely, and within the template for composer.hbs we do
this:
```javascript
@discourseComputed
composerComponent() {
return this.siteSettings.enable_experimental_composer_uploader
? "composer-editor-uppy"
: "composer-editor";
},
```
```handlebars
{{component composerComponent ...}}
```
This is the only way I can think to do it, because it is not possible to
access the site settings when the component is first declared I can't do
something like:
```javascript
const uploaderMixin = this.siteSettings.use_experimental_uploader?
ComposerUploaderUppy : ComposerUploader;
Component.extend(uploaderMixin, {});
```
An additional change in this PR is explicitly passing in these four
plugin data structures to the composer-editor Component, rather
than relying on JS closures which the mixin cannot do:
* uploadMarkdownResolvers
* uploadProcessorActions
* uploadProcessorQueue
* uploadHandlers
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| images | ||
| javascripts | ||
| stylesheets | ||