fish-shell/doc_src/cmds/string-match.rst

144 lines
5.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

string-match - match substrings
===============================
Synopsis
--------
.. BEGIN SYNOPSIS
docs synopsis: add HTML highlighing and automate manpage markup Recent synopsis changes move from literal code blocks to [RST line blocks]. This does not translate well to HTML: it's not rendered in monospace, so aligment is lost. Additionally, we don't get syntax highlighting in HTML, which adds differences to our code samples which are highlighted. We hard-wrap synopsis lines (like code blocks). To align continuation lines in manpages we need [backslashes in weird places]. Combined with the **, *, and `` markup, it's a bit hard to get the alignment right. Fix these by moving synopsis sources back to code blocks and compute HTML syntax highlighting and manpage markup with a custom Sphinx extension. The new Pygments lexer can tokenize a synopsis and assign the various highlighting roles, which closely matches fish's syntax highlighing: - command/keyword (dark blue) - parameter (light blue) - operator like and/or/not/&&/|| (cyan) - grammar metacharacter (black) For manpage output, we don't project the fish syntax highlighting but follow the markup convention in GNU's man(1): bold text type exactly as shown. italic text replace with appropriate argument. To make it easy to separate these two automatically, formalize that (italic) placeholders must be uppercase; while all lowercase text is interpreted literally (so rendered bold). This makes manpages more consistent, see string-join(1) and and(1). Implementation notes: Since we want manpage formatting but Sphinx's Pygments highlighing plugin does not support manpage output, add our custom "synopsis" directive. This directive parses differently when manpage output is specified. This means that the HTML and manpage build processes must not share a cache, because the parsed doctrees are cached. Work around this by using separate cache locations for build targets "sphinx-docs" (which creates HTML) and "sphinx-manpages". A better solution would be to only override Sphinx's ManualPageBuilder but that would take a bit more code (ideally we could override ManualPageWriter but Sphinx 4.3.2 doesn't really support that). --- Alternative solution: stick with line blocks but use roles like :command: or :option: (or custom ones). While this would make it possible to produce HTML that is consistent with code blocks (by adding a bit of CSS), the source would look uglier and is harder to maintain. (Let's say we want to add custom formatting to the [|] metacharacters in HTML. This is much easier with the proposed patch.) --- [RST line blocks]: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#line-blocks [backslashes in weird places]: https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/8626#discussion_r782837750
2022-01-09 22:09:46 +08:00
.. synopsis::
string match [-a | --all] [-e | --entire] [-i | --ignore-case]
[-g | --groups-only] [-r | --regex] [-n | --index]
[-q | --quiet] [-v | --invert]
docs synopsis: add HTML highlighing and automate manpage markup Recent synopsis changes move from literal code blocks to [RST line blocks]. This does not translate well to HTML: it's not rendered in monospace, so aligment is lost. Additionally, we don't get syntax highlighting in HTML, which adds differences to our code samples which are highlighted. We hard-wrap synopsis lines (like code blocks). To align continuation lines in manpages we need [backslashes in weird places]. Combined with the **, *, and `` markup, it's a bit hard to get the alignment right. Fix these by moving synopsis sources back to code blocks and compute HTML syntax highlighting and manpage markup with a custom Sphinx extension. The new Pygments lexer can tokenize a synopsis and assign the various highlighting roles, which closely matches fish's syntax highlighing: - command/keyword (dark blue) - parameter (light blue) - operator like and/or/not/&&/|| (cyan) - grammar metacharacter (black) For manpage output, we don't project the fish syntax highlighting but follow the markup convention in GNU's man(1): bold text type exactly as shown. italic text replace with appropriate argument. To make it easy to separate these two automatically, formalize that (italic) placeholders must be uppercase; while all lowercase text is interpreted literally (so rendered bold). This makes manpages more consistent, see string-join(1) and and(1). Implementation notes: Since we want manpage formatting but Sphinx's Pygments highlighing plugin does not support manpage output, add our custom "synopsis" directive. This directive parses differently when manpage output is specified. This means that the HTML and manpage build processes must not share a cache, because the parsed doctrees are cached. Work around this by using separate cache locations for build targets "sphinx-docs" (which creates HTML) and "sphinx-manpages". A better solution would be to only override Sphinx's ManualPageBuilder but that would take a bit more code (ideally we could override ManualPageWriter but Sphinx 4.3.2 doesn't really support that). --- Alternative solution: stick with line blocks but use roles like :command: or :option: (or custom ones). While this would make it possible to produce HTML that is consistent with code blocks (by adding a bit of CSS), the source would look uglier and is harder to maintain. (Let's say we want to add custom formatting to the [|] metacharacters in HTML. This is much easier with the proposed patch.) --- [RST line blocks]: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#line-blocks [backslashes in weird places]: https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/8626#discussion_r782837750
2022-01-09 22:09:46 +08:00
PATTERN [STRING ...]
.. END SYNOPSIS
Description
-----------
.. BEGIN DESCRIPTION
``string match`` tests each *STRING* against *PATTERN* and prints matching substrings. Only the first match for each *STRING* is reported unless **-a** or **--all** is given, in which case all matches are reported.
If you specify the **-e** or **--entire** then each matching string is printed including any prefix or suffix not matched by the pattern (equivalent to ``grep`` without the **-o** flag). You can, obviously, achieve the same result by prepending and appending **\*** or **.*** depending on whether or not you have specified the **--regex** flag. The **--entire** flag is simply a way to avoid having to complicate the pattern in that fashion and make the intent of the ``string match`` clearer. Without **--entire** and **--regex**, a *PATTERN* will need to match the entire *STRING* before it will be reported.
Matching can be made case-insensitive with **--ignore-case** or **-i**.
If **--groups-only** or **-g** is given, only the capturing groups will be reported - meaning the full match will be skipped. This is incompatible with **--entire** and **--invert**, and requires **--regex**. It is useful as a simple cutting tool instead of ``string replace``, so you can simply choose "this part" of a string.
If **--index** or **-n** is given, each match is reported as a 1-based start position and a length. By default, PATTERN is interpreted as a glob pattern matched against each entire *STRING* argument. A glob pattern is only considered a valid match if it matches the entire *STRING*.
If **--regex** or **-r** is given, *PATTERN* is interpreted as a Perl-compatible regular expression, which does not have to match the entire *STRING*. For a regular expression containing capturing groups, multiple items will be reported for each match, one for the entire match and one for each capturing group. With this, only the matching part of the *STRING* will be reported, unless **--entire** is given.
When matching via regular expressions, ``string match`` automatically sets variables for all named capturing groups (``(?<name>expression)``). It will create a variable with the name of the group, in the default scope, for each named capturing group, and set it to the value of the capturing group in the first matched argument. If a named capture group matched an empty string, the variable will be set to the empty string (like ``set var ""``). If it did not match, the variable will be set to nothing (like ``set var``). When **--regex** is used with **--all**, this behavior changes. Each named variable will contain a list of matches, with the first match contained in the first element, the second match in the second, and so on. If the group was empty or did not match, the corresponding element will be an empty string.
2020-11-26 11:55:48 +08:00
If **--invert** or **-v** is used the selected lines will be only those which do not match the given glob pattern or regular expression.
Exit status: 0 if at least one match was found, or 1 otherwise.
.. END DESCRIPTION
Examples
--------
.. BEGIN EXAMPLES
Match Glob Examples
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
::
>_ string match '?' a
a
>_ string match 'a*b' axxb
axxb
>_ string match -i 'a??B' Axxb
Axxb
>_ string match -- '-*' -h foo --version bar
# To match things that look like options, we need a `--`
# to tell string its options end there.
-h
--version
>_ echo 'ok?' | string match '*\?'
ok?
# Note that only the second STRING will match here.
>_ string match 'foo' 'foo1' 'foo' 'foo2'
foo
>_ string match -e 'foo' 'foo1' 'foo' 'foo2'
foo1
foo
foo2
>_ string match 'foo?' 'foo1' 'foo' 'foo2'
foo1
foo2
Match Regex Examples
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
::
>_ string match -r 'cat|dog|fish' 'nice dog'
dog
>_ string match -r -v "c.*[12]" {cat,dog}(seq 1 4)
dog1
dog2
cat3
dog3
cat4
dog4
>_ string match -r -- '-.*' -h foo --version bar
# To match things that look like options, we need a `--`
# to tell string its options end there.
-h
--version
>_ string match -r '(\d\d?):(\d\d):(\d\d)' 2:34:56
2:34:56
2
34
56
>_ string match -r '^(\w{2,4})\1$' papa mud murmur
papa
pa
murmur
mur
>_ string match -r -a -n at ratatat
2 2
4 2
6 2
>_ string match -r -i '0x[0-9a-f]{1,8}' 'int magic = 0xBadC0de;'
0xBadC0de
2020-11-26 11:55:48 +08:00
>_ echo $version
3.1.2-1575-ga2ff32d90
>_ string match -rq '(?<major>\d+).(?<minor>\d+).(?<revision>\d+)' -- $version
>_ echo "You are using fish $major!"
You are using fish 3!
>_ string match -raq ' *(?<sentence>[^.!?]+)(?<punctuation>[.!?])?' "hello, friend. goodbye"
>_ printf "%s\n" -- $sentence
hello, friend
goodbye
>_ printf "%s\n" -- $punctuation
.
>_ string match -rq '(?<word>hello)' 'hi'
>_ count $word
0
.. END EXAMPLES