We don't forward this variable for storage in any structs, so there's no reason
to go through an Arc instead of returning the `&'static EnvStack` directly.
NB: This particular change was safe, and passes all tests on its own.
We don't forward this variable for storage in any structs, so there's no reason
to go through an Arc instead of returning the `&'static EnvStack` directly.
This is similar to f7dac82ed (Escape separators (colon and equals) to improve
completion, 2019-08-23) except we only escape : and = if they are the result of
file completions. This way we avoid issues with custom completions like dd.
This also means that it won't work for things like __fish_complete_suffix
[*] but that can be fixed later, once we can serialize the DONT_ESCAPE flag.
By moving the escaping step earlier, this causes some unit test changes
which should not result in actual behavior change.
See also #6099
[*]: The new \: and \= does not leak from "complete -C" because that command
unescapes its output -- unless --escape is given.
Multiline search strings are weirdly broken (inserting control characters
in the command line) and probably not very useful anyway.
On the other hand I often want to compose a multi-line command
from single-line commands I ran previously.
Let's support this case by limiting the initial search string to the current
line; and replace only that line.
Alternatively this could operate on jobs (that is, replace a surrounding
"foo | bar") instead of using line boundaries.
Commit b768b9d3f (Use fuzzy subsequence completion for options names as well,
2024-01-27) allowed completing "oa" to "--foobar", which is a false positive,
especially because it hides other valid completions of non-option arguments.
Let's at least require a leading dash again before completing option names.
Version 2.1.0 introduced subsequence matching for completions but as the
changelog entry mentions, "This feature [...] is not yet implemented for
options (like ``--foobar``)". Add it. Seems like a strict improvement,
pretty much.
