Inside a comment we offer plain file completions (or command completions if
the comment is in command position). However these completions are broken
because they don't consider any of the surrounding characters. For example
with a command line
echo # comment
^ cursor
we suggest file completions and insert them as
echo # comsomefile ment
Providing completions inside comments does not seem useful and it can be
misleading. Let's remove the completions; this should communicate better that
we are in a free-form comment that's not subject to fish syntax.
Closes#9320
Fixes ommitted newline char shown after complete -n'(foo)'
Also axes the 'contains syntax errors' line before the error.
Update tests
before
> complete -n'(foo)'
complete: Condition '(foo)' contained a syntax error
complete: Command substitutions not allowed⏎
after
> complete -n'(foo)'
complete: -n '(foo)': command substitutions not allowed here
This stops us from loading the completions for e.g. `./foo` if there
is no `foo` in path.
This is because the completion scripts will call an unqualified `foo`,
and then error out.
This of course means if the script would work because it never calls
the command, we still don't load it.
Pathed completions via `complete --path` should be unaffected because
they aren't autoloaded anyway.
Workaround for #3117Fixes#9133
This makes it so `complete -c foo -n test1 -n test2` registers *both*
conditions, and when it comes time to check the candidate, tries both,
in that order. If any fails it stops, if all succeed the completion is offered.
The reason for this is that it helps with caching - we have a
condition cache, but conditions like
```fish
test (count (commandline -opc)) -ge 2; and contains -- (commandline -opc)[2] length
test (count (commandline -opc)) -ge 2; and contains -- (commandline -opc)[2] sub
```
defeats it pretty easily, because the cache only looks at the entire
script as a string - it can't tell that the first `test` is the same
in both.
So this means we separate it into
```fish
complete -f -c string -n "test (count (commandline -opc)) -ge 2; and contains -- (commandline -opc)[2] length" -s V -l visible -d "Use the visible width, excluding escape sequences"
+complete -f -c string -n "test (count (commandline -opc)) -ge 2" -n "contains -- (commandline -opc)[2] length" -s V -l visible -d "Use the visible width, excluding escape sequences"
```
which allows the `test` to be cached.
In tests, this improves performance for the string completions by 30%
by reducing all the redundant `test` calls.
The `git` completions can also greatly benefit from this.
Today, a command like "var=val status " has custom completions
because we skip over the var=val variable override when detecting
the command token.
However if the custom completions read the commandline state (via
"commandline -opc") they do see they variable override, which breaks
them, most likely. Try "a=b git ".
For completions of wrapped commands, we already set a transient
commandline. Do the same for commands with leading variable overrides;
then git completions for "a=b git " will think the commandline is
"git ".
A «complete -C '~/fish-shell/build/fish '» fails to load custom
completions because we do not expand the ~, so
complete_param_for_command() thinks that this command is invalid.
Expand command tokens before loading custom completions.
Fixes#8442
Things like
```fish
complete command -n '__fish_seen_subcommand_from subcommand'
--force-files
```
would not be obeyed because we only checked force-files when there was
an option.
Fixes#7920.
This switch is no longer necessary when only one command is given.
Internally completions are stored separately for each command,
so we only every print one command name per "complete" line anyway.
Detect recursive calls to builtin complete and the internal completion in
the same place.
In 0a0149cc2 (Prevent infinite recursion when completion wraps variable assignment)
we don't print an error when completing certain aliases like:
alias vim "A=B vim"
But we also gave no completions.
We could make this case work, but I think that trying to salvage situations
like this one is way too complex. Instead, let the user know by printing an
error. Not sure if the style of the error fits.
We could add some heuristic to alias to not add --wraps in some cyclic cases.
Currently, completions have to be specified like
```fish
complete -c foo -l opt
```
while
```fish
complete foo -l opt
```
just complains about there being too many arguments.
That's kinda useless, so we just assume if there is one left-over
argument that it's meant to be the command.
Theoretically we could also use *all* the arguments as commands to
complete, but that seems unlikely to be what the user wants.
(I don't think multi-command completions really happen)
Currently only `complete` will list completions, and it will list all
of them.
That's a bit ridiculous, especially since `complete -c foo` just does nothing.
So just make `complete -c foo` list all the completions for `foo`.
With the new pexpect based framework, bind and pipeline expect tests can
be removed.
Amusingly the complete.fish check required the existence of bind.expect.
Fix the check at the same time.
Because `command ./somedir/somecommand` is okay.
Fixes test failure from aa304cbd3d.
Child directories in $PATH are still not suggested, as was the main
intention of the commit that introduced the tests:
8a3cf144f Don't include child directories of $PATH in completions.
complete -C'echo $HOM ' would complete $HOM instead of a new token.
Fixes another regression introduced in
6fb7f9b6b - Fix completion for builtins with subcommands
It's now good enough to do so.
We don't allow grid-alignment:
```fish
complete -c foo -s b -l barnanana -a '(something)'
complete -c foo -s z -a '(something)'
```
becomes
```fish
complete -c foo -s b -l barnanana -a '(something)'
complete -c foo -s z -a '(something)'
```
It's just more trouble than it is worth.
The one part I'd change:
We align and/or'd parts of an if-condition with the in-block code:
```fish
if true
and false
dosomething
end
```
becomes
```fish
if true
and false
dosomething
end
```
but it's not used terribly much and if we ever fix it we can just
reindent.
Presently the completion engine ignores builtins that are part of the
fish syntax. This can be a problem when completing a string that was
based on the output of `commandline -p`. This changes completions to
treat these builtins like any other command.
This also disables generic (filename) completion inside comments and
after strings that do not tokenize.
Additionally, comments are stripped off the output of `commandline -p`.
Fixes#5415Fixes#2705
Consider a group of short options, like -xzPARAM, where x and z are options and z takes an argument.
This commit enables completion of the argument to the last option (z), both within the same
token (-xzP) or in the next one (-xz P).
complete -C'-xz' will complete only parameters to z.
complete -C'-xz ' will complete only parameters to z if z requires a parameter
otherwise, it will also complete non-option parameters
To do so this implements a heuristic to differentiate such strings from single long options. To
detect whether our token contains some short options, we only require the first character after the
dash (here x) to be an option. Previously, all characters had to be short options. The last option
in our example is z. Everything after the last option is assumed to be a parameter to the last
option.
Assume there is also a single long option -x-foo, then complete -C'-x' will suggest both -x-foo and
-xy. However, when the single option x requires an argument, this will not suggest -x-foo.
However, I assume this will almost never happen in practise since completions very rarely mix
short and single long options.
Fixes#332
