Prior to this change, if we saw more than one repaint readline command in
a row, we would try to ignore the second one. However this was never the
right thing to do since sometimes we really do need to repaint twice in a
row (e.g. the user hits Ctrl+L twice). Previously we were saved by the
buginess of this mechanism but with the repainting refactoring we see
missing redraws.
Remove the coalescing logic and add a test. Fixes#7280.
Because TERM was set to something other than 'dumb', we were subject to
syntax highlighting and other interactive features that would affect the
output. In practice we were getting lucky timing-wise, but with upcoming
interactive changes syntax highlighting started to fail this test.
This concerns code like the following:
while true ; sleep 100; end
Here 'while' is a "simple block execution" and does not create a new job,
or get a pgid. Each 'sleep' however is an external command execution, and
is treated as a distinct job. (bash is the same way). So `while` and
`sleep` are always in different job groups.
The problem comes about if 'sleep' is cancelled through SIGINT or SIGQUIT.
Prior to 2a4c545b21, if *any* process got a SIGINT or SIGQUIT, then fish
would mark a global "stop executing" variable. This obviously prevents
background execution of fish functions.
In 2a4c545b21, this was changed so only the job's group gets marked as
cancelled. However in the case of one job group spawning another, we
weren't propagating the signal.
This adds a signal to parse_execution_context which the parser checks after
execution. It's not ideal since now we have three different places where
signals can be recorded. However it fixes this regression which is too
important to leave unfixed for long.
Fixes#7259
Might help figuring out where this times out on CI?
We're waiting *20 seconds* for the output to appear, there's no way
that's too slow. So maybe we're going too fast elsewhere?
It's useless - `expect` has a timeout anyway, and it defaults to 5s,
so these 0.5s sleeps just mean it'll always take at least 0.5s.
Sometimes it is useful to let things settle before *sending* text, and
it would be nice to be able to set the timeout for each expect
separately, but just adding to the timeout isn't useful.
This can be used to determine whether the previous command produced a real status, or just carried over the status from the command before it. Backgrounded commands and variable assignments will not increment status_generation, all other commands will.
This changes how fish attempts to protect itself from calling tcsetpgrp() too
aggressively. Recall that tcsetpgrp() will "force" itself, if SIGTTOU is
ignored (which it is in fish when job control is enabled).
Prior to this fix, we avoided SIGTTINs by only transferring the tty ownership
if fish was already the owner. This dated from a time before we had really
nailed down how pgroups should be assigned. Now we more deliberately assign a
job's pgroup so we don't need this conservative check.
However we still need logic to avoid transferring the tty if fish is not the
owner. The bad case is when job control is enabled while fish is running in the
background - here fish would transfer the tty and "steal" from the foreground
process.
So retain the checks of the current tty owner but migrate them to the point of
calling tcsetpgrp() itself.
I really kinda hate how insistent clang-format is to have line
breaks *IFF THE LINE IS TOO LONG*.
Like... lemme just add a break if it looks better, will you?
But it is the style at this time, so we shall tie an onion to our
belt.
Note: This includes a super cheesy thing to print variable contents.
The expect version has one that's a bit more elaborate (featuring a
marker setup), but tbh that doesn't seem to be worth it.
If we do need it, we can add it, but it seems more likely we'd just do
`set -S`, or do it in a check instead.
Make it easier to use pexpect and to understand its error messages.
Switch to a style in tests using bound methods, which makes them
less noisy to write.
This adds a new interactive test framework based on Python's pexpect. This
is intended to supplant the TCL expect-based tests.
New tests go in `tests/pexpects/`. As a proof-of-concept, the
pipeline.expect test and the (gnarly) bind.expect test are ported to the
new framework.
