Otherwise this was 100% monospace.
But since we have a specific list of fonts that we have checked, let's
use the same list instead of just adding "Helvetica" again.
Since the color previews are now wider, we had quite a wide range
where there would only be one. Remove the border around the content
earlier so windows with 1000px width still get two previews in a row.
(making the text shorter would also be an option here)
This makes the container fit the content, otherwise we'd be cutting
off the "> quack &" part of the first line.
Also while we're here increase the line-height a bit to give it more
breathing room, and increase the font size juuust a smidge.
Reduce margins and increase padding to make it less cramped.
This takes the changes from 03b23dd1b6
and applies them to the .theme version as well.
(note: It's *possible* to just go through fish_config in future, but
we do not want to do that right now because that can have issues on
upgrade)
This sets the variable to the background value of
$fish_color_search_match, which fixes the case where you switch from a
theme with a set selected background (like our default, now) to one without.
Unfortunately the normal font families like "sans-serif" and
"monospace" are basically broken because the browser defaults are
decades old.
TODO: Inline code is barely distinguishable.
Instead of weirdly smearing the color, simply increase the values
until they are bright enough.
This prevents /tmp from being white, and guarantees visible colors for
all directories.
The `name` attribute I used in commit f725cd402d
is undocumented, and [someone discovered] that it does not exist for one
possible browser on MacOS. This should make the code work correctly even in that case.
This probably doesn't currently cause a problem, at least when
`isMacOS10_12_5_OrLater()` is true, because of the ordering of the if
statements in the `runThing` function.
[someone discovered]: https://bugs.python.org/issue43424#msg409087
This is a stop gap. Ideally setting a theme would be idempotent. You
set it, all colors change to match it, even the ones it does not
specify.
However, I do not believe we can *erase* colors that aren't set, and
we don't currently do so in the CLI version. So skip setting these at
all, for now.
If a color is mentioned but empty, it will be set to empty.
If the theme says "brgreen", that's what we want the variable to say
after.
This used to translate it through our palette, so it ended up as
00ff00, which isn't the same.
This still keeps the idea that colors that aren't in the palette are
better, and it does it in a slightly roundabout way (translate color
string to rgb string, see if the rgb string is a key in that
translation dictionary), but it should work for now.
Theoretically if this only includes simple characters, it won't cause
any issues. We already validate in other places but it doesn't hurt to
do this twice.
Now that we have modifiers and can have backgrounds and such, simply
setting it as css style doesn't cut it.
So let's stop validating for now, the worst that can happen is that
the color isn't rendered.
This just simply passed the "color" value, which is just the
foreground color string.
Instead, we pass the actual object back, with the modifiers as bools
and foreground/background separate.
Our themes don't use background a lot, except in the pager, so this
never really came up.
We only need the curses module to look up sgr0, bold and underline
sequences.
Since those are going to be the xterm versions 90% of the time, we can
simply use those if this fails.
Fixes#8487.
Otherwise, with a light-theme, the selected entry uses black text with
"bright black" background, which can be low contrast thus hard to read.
The description background is different, maybe we can fix that later.
See #8376
This basically disables syntax highlighting. That doesn't mean we use
absolutely no colors - the search match, suggestion, selection and the
pager have coloring, but only reverse or brblack.
The idea is that this disables anything that tells you about
the *syntax*, but it still tells you about the state of the
commandline. If we didn't highlight the selection it would be entirely
invisible, and if we didn't highlight the suggestion you would have no
idea where it begins.
So this basically brings colors on-par with bash, where the search
match is colored (in reverse) and suggestions aren't a thing.
An alternative is to add a $fish_highlighting_enabled variable like
the one for suggestions. That's still possible, but would require some
internal changes to avoid coloring some things with $fish_color_normal
and other things with the normal terminal color.
One thing this also does not do is set the git prompt colors. These
are currently disallowed from being set in theme files because they
start with `__fish` instead of just `fish`. We should probably rename
them.
