I tested this manually (`littlecheck.py -s fish=fish tests/checks/eval.fish`) from the base directory, which means I got
"tests/checks/eval", while the real test gets "checks/eval".
I then reran `make test_fishscript`, but that didn't pull in the
updated test - we should really handle that better.
I'm gonna add more tests to this and I don't want to touch the old stuff.
Notice that this needs to have the output of the complete_directories
test adjusted because this one now runs later.
That's something we should take into account in future.
This required a bit of thinking.
What we do is we have one test that fakes $HOME, and then we do the
various config tests there.
The fake config we have is reused and we exercise all of the same codepaths.
This is a bit weird sometimes, e.g. to test the return status (that
fish actually *returns $status*), we use a #RUN line with %fish
invoking %fish, so we can use the substitution.
Still much nicer.
The missing scripts are those that rely on config.
This is a nice test (ha!) for how this works and what littlecheck can
do for us.
1. Input is now the actual file, not "Standard Input" anymore. So
any errors mentioning that now include the filename.
2. Regex are really nice for filenames, but especially for line
numbers
3. It's much nicer to have the output where it's created, instead of
needing to follow three files at the same time.
This adds support for .check files inside the tests directory. .check
files are tests designed to be run with littlecheck.
Port printf test to littlecheck and remove the printf.in test.