- update actions ci
- include json for 4 spaces tab
- provide output int for process code exit
- adhere to parent type hint of builder
- mailer instance now needs a name, multiple can be instantiated
- getOriginal now uses mutators in the model
- Temporarily loosen MailableInterface requirements. This avoids an immediate BC break for classes in extensions that implement this interface.
- Temporarily provide (and autoload) old symfony translator interface
- make queue exception handler compatible with the contract of L8
- Update phpunit schema for newer version
- Update phpunit assert calls for newer version
- Make session token-based instead of user-based
- Clear current session access tokens on logout
- Introduce increment ID so we can show tokens to moderators in the future without exposing secrets
- Switch to type classes to manage the different token types. New implementation fixes#2075
- Drop ability to customize lifetime per-token
- Add developer access keys that don't expire. These must be created from the database for now
- Add title in preparation for the developer token UI
- Add IP and user agent logging
- Delete all non-remember tokens in migration
Updated GroupFilterGambit to prevent hidden groups being visible where they shouldn't be and to ensure that only the selected groups are returned on a search. Fixes#2559
- Split user edit permision into edit attributes, edit credentials, and edit groups
- Only Admins can edit Admin Credentials
- Only Admins can Promote/Demote to/from Admin
Under InnoDB, database entries created in transactions are not processed by fulltext indexes until the transaction is committed. To work around this, cases that test fulltext search have been split off into a separate class that adds and removes seed discussions/posts outside of transactions during setUp/tearDown.
Before transactions, each test class would need to explicitly state starting state for permissions, which made the initial permission configuration somewhat arbitrary. Now, we might as well use the initial state of the default installation.
One of the User show_test tests has been commented out until
- Support slug drivers for core's sluggable models, easily extends to other models
- Add automated testing for affected single-model API routes
- Fix nickname selection UI
- Serialize slugs as `slug` attribute
- Make min search length a constant
Only users that have the new `viewHiddenGroups` permissions will be able to see these groups.
You might want this when you want to give certain users special permissions, but don't want to make your authorization scheme public to regular users.
Co-authored-by: luceos <daniel+github@klabbers.email>
There are two more API integration tests that explicitly add the
"Authorization" header right now:
- `Flarum\Tests\integration\api\authentication\WithApiKeyTest`
- `Flarum\Tests\integration\api\csrf_protection\RequireCsrfTokenTest`
These two specifically test authentication, so in those cases the
explicitness seems desirable.
Test the request, not a controller (implementation detail). This also
focuses on the observable behavior instead of hacking our way into the
middleware pipeline in order to observe internal behavior.
The authenticated user is now determined by looking at the API response
to compare permissions and (non-)existing JSON keys.
We decided it is better to have a less intelligent search (that does not
match search terms in titles) for some people than a bad-performing
search for everyone.
We will revisit the search performance topic in the next release cycle,
possibly with larger changes around indexing.
Refs #1738, #1741, #1764.
In flarum/core#1854, I changed the implementation of `assertCan()` to be
more aware of the user's log-in status. I came across this when unifying
our API's response status code when actors are not authenticated or not
authorized to do something.
@luceos rightfully had to tweak this again in ea84fc4, because the
behavior changed for one of the few API endpoints that checked for a
permission that even guests can have.
It turns out having this complex behavior in `assertCan()` is quite
misleading, because the name suggests a simple permission check and
nothing more.
Where we actually want to differ between HTTP 401 and 403, we can do
this using two method calls, and enforce it with our tests.
If this turns out to be problematic or extremely common, we can revisit
this and introduce a method with a different, better name in the future.
This commit restores the method's behavior in the last release, so we
also avoid another breaking change for extensions.
This test would have failed without commit ea84fc4. Next, I will revert
that commit and most of my PR #1854, so we need this test to ensure the
API continues to behave as desired.
