Now we have two extenders:
- `Extend\LanguagePack` is the "convention over configuration" loader
for complete language packs.
- `Extend\Locales` can be used to load files (by locale) from a given
directory - useful for extensions that bring along their own locales
in multiple different languages.
Refs #851.
The gathering and execution of extenders can actually be done here
in the `Extension` class. This way, the `ExtensionManager` only
deals with the question of which extensions are enabled, the
`Extension` class actually extends the core application, and the
service provider simply calls a method, without having to know
about internals.
* Update FontAwesome to v5.0.6
* Adapt DiscussionListItem-count icon to match FontAwesome 5 syntax
* Change icon name to match FontAwesome 5.0.6 fas icon
* Add font type prefix parameter to icon helper
* Add Enable Icon Prefix to show icon in Extension Page
* Fix invalid icon behavior
* Change icon name to match FontAwesome 5.0.6 far icon
* Use iconPrefix property on component
* Use full icon class name
* Update icon helper docblock
* Full icon class syntax
Exceptions thrown while attempting to dispatch routes are now informing the exact value that was incorrect; url for not found routes and the method when the method was invalid.
* Improve fulltext gambit
* Only search in visible posts
This change relies on the `visibility-scoping` branch to be merged.
* Change posts table to use InnoDB engine
Doing a JOIN between an InnoDB table (discussions) and a MyISAM table
(posts) is very very (very) bad for performance. FULLTEXT indexes are
fully supported in InnoDB now, and it is a superior engine in every
other way, so there is no longer any reason to be using MyISAM.
* Use ::class
* Only search for comment posts
* Add fulltext index to discussions.title
* Fix migration not working if there is a table prefix
* Update frontend appearance
* Apply fixes from StyleCI
[ci skip] [skip ci]
* Show search result excerpts on mobile
This fixes an issue where unapproved discussions (via
flarum-ext-approval) that were rejected became invisible to the user.
This solution is imperfect and some more substantial thought into how
flarum-ext-approval works is required in the future.
* Overhaul the way model visibility scoping works
- Previously post visibility scoping required concrete knowledge of the
parent discussion, ie. you needed a Discussion model on which you
would call `postsVisibleTo($actor)`. This meant that to fetch posts
from different discussions (eg. when listing user posts), it was a
convoluted process, ultimately causing #1333.
Now posts behave like any other model in terms of visibility scoping,
and you simply call `whereVisibleTo($actor)` on a Post query. This
scope will automatically apply a WHERE EXISTS clause that scopes the
query to only include posts whose discussions are visible too. Thus,
fetching posts from multiple discussions can now be done in a single
query, simplifying things greatly and fixing #1333.
- As such, the ScopePostVisibility event has been removed. Also, the
rest of the "Scope" events have been consolidated into a single event,
ScopeModelVisibility. This event is called whenever a user must have
a certain $ability in order to see a set of discussions. Typically
this ability is just "view". But in the case of discussions which have
been marked as `is_private`, it is "viewPrivate". And in the case of
discussions which have been hidden, it is "hide". etc.
The relevant API on AbstractPolicy has been refined, now providing
`find`, `findPrivate`, `findEmpty`, and `findWithPermission` methods.
This could probably do with further refinement and we can re-address
it once we get around to implementing more Extenders.
- An additional change is that Discussion::comments() (the relation
used to calculate the cached number of replies) now yields "comments
that are not private", where before it meant "comments that are
visible to Guests". This was flawed because eg. comments in non-public
tags are technically not visible to Guests.
Consequently, the Approval extension must adopt usage of `is_private`,
so that posts which are not approved are not included in the replies
count. Fundamentally, `is_private` now indicates that a discussion/
post should be hidden by default and should only be visible if it
meets certain criteria. This is in comparison to non-is_private
entities, which are visible by default and may be hidden if they don't
meet certain criteria.
Note that these changes have not been extensively tested, but I have
been over the logic multiple times and it seems to check out.
* Add event to determine whether a discussion `is_private`
See https://github.com/flarum/core/pull/1153#issuecomment-292693624
* Don't include hidden posts in the comments count
* Apply fixes from StyleCI (#1350)
