* Don't use body as tooltip container, allow notification area overflow
Badge tooltips are using container: 'body', so they can overflow the
notification area. When the user navigates back while a badge tooltip is
showing, the tooltip remains visible.
This commit removes the body container attribute and instead allows the
notificationDropDown to overflow, so badge tooltips aren't cut off.
Instead, this adds overflow: hidden to NotificationList.
Fixes#2118.
* Remove newline
* Use decodeURI instead of unescape & don't close modals
* Add comment
* Don't use a try/catch, clean up the group log code
* Remove double negative
* Format; fix issues from rebasing
In Laravel 5.8, the `Container::tagged()` method was changed to return
an iterator [1].
We only use the result for iteration, or, in this case, to pass a bunch
of "reporters" to the error handler middleware, therefore we need to
accept an iterable here.
[1]: https://laravel.com/docs/5.8/upgrade#container-generators
Apparently, this code was from back when we had a special "extensions"
directory for Composer packages marked as Flarum extensions.
While we're at it, we now inject the Paths instance instead of using one
of the global helpers (which I am trying to get rid of).
Refs #2055.
- Stop trying to implement Laravel's Application contract, which
has no value for us.
- Stop inheriting from the Container, injecting one works equally
well and does not clutter up the interfaces.
- Inject the Paths collection instead of unwrapping it again, for
better encapsulation.
This brings us one step closer toward upgrading our Laravel
components (#2055), because we no longer need to adopt the changes
to the Application contract.
This ensures that default values, date attributes and relationships are properly inherited, when we have deeper model class hierarchies.
This also adds test cases to ensure that inheritance order is honored for relationship and default attribute extender. As there's no way to remove date attributes, the order of evaluation there doesn't matter.
Only users that have the new `viewHiddenGroups` permissions will be able to see these groups.
You might want this when you want to give certain users special permissions, but don't want to make your authorization scheme public to regular users.
Co-authored-by: luceos <daniel+github@klabbers.email>
