2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
// Copyright 2020 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
2022-11-28 02:20:29 +08:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-24 17:49:20 +08:00
|
|
|
package user
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
2021-11-24 17:49:20 +08:00
|
|
|
"context"
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
"crypto/md5"
|
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
|
|
"image/png"
|
|
|
|
"io"
|
|
|
|
|
Avatar refactor, move avatar code from `models` to `models.avatars`, remove duplicated code (#17123)
Why this refactor
The goal is to move most files from `models` package to `models.xxx` package. Many models depend on avatar model, so just move this first.
And the existing logic is not clear, there are too many function like `AvatarLink`, `RelAvatarLink`, `SizedRelAvatarLink`, `SizedAvatarLink`, `MakeFinalAvatarURL`, `HashedAvatarLink`, etc. This refactor make everything clear:
* user.AvatarLink()
* user.AvatarLinkWithSize(size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFastLink(email, size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFinalLink(email, size)
And many duplicated code are deleted in route handler, the handler and the model share the same avatar logic now.
2021-10-06 07:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/avatars"
|
2021-09-19 19:49:59 +08:00
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/avatar"
|
2024-05-08 21:34:43 +08:00
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/httplib"
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/storage"
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CustomAvatarRelativePath returns user custom avatar relative path.
|
|
|
|
func (u *User) CustomAvatarRelativePath() string {
|
|
|
|
return u.Avatar
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// GenerateRandomAvatar generates a random avatar for user.
|
2022-05-20 22:08:52 +08:00
|
|
|
func GenerateRandomAvatar(ctx context.Context, u *User) error {
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
seed := u.Email
|
|
|
|
if len(seed) == 0 {
|
|
|
|
seed = u.Name
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
img, err := avatar.RandomImage([]byte(seed))
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
2022-10-25 03:29:17 +08:00
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("RandomImage: %w", err)
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-10-24 01:55:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Avatar refactor, move avatar code from `models` to `models.avatars`, remove duplicated code (#17123)
Why this refactor
The goal is to move most files from `models` package to `models.xxx` package. Many models depend on avatar model, so just move this first.
And the existing logic is not clear, there are too many function like `AvatarLink`, `RelAvatarLink`, `SizedRelAvatarLink`, `SizedAvatarLink`, `MakeFinalAvatarURL`, `HashedAvatarLink`, etc. This refactor make everything clear:
* user.AvatarLink()
* user.AvatarLinkWithSize(size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFastLink(email, size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFinalLink(email, size)
And many duplicated code are deleted in route handler, the handler and the model share the same avatar logic now.
2021-10-06 07:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
u.Avatar = avatars.HashEmail(seed)
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-03 02:01:09 +08:00
|
|
|
// Don't share the images so that we can delete them easily
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
if err := storage.SaveFrom(storage.Avatars, u.CustomAvatarRelativePath(), func(w io.Writer) error {
|
|
|
|
if err := png.Encode(w, img); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Encode: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
}); err != nil {
|
2022-10-25 03:29:17 +08:00
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("Failed to create dir %s: %w", u.CustomAvatarRelativePath(), err)
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-24 17:49:20 +08:00
|
|
|
if _, err := db.GetEngine(ctx).ID(u.ID).Cols("avatar").Update(u); err != nil {
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
log.Info("New random avatar created: %d", u.ID)
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Avatar refactor, move avatar code from `models` to `models.avatars`, remove duplicated code (#17123)
Why this refactor
The goal is to move most files from `models` package to `models.xxx` package. Many models depend on avatar model, so just move this first.
And the existing logic is not clear, there are too many function like `AvatarLink`, `RelAvatarLink`, `SizedRelAvatarLink`, `SizedAvatarLink`, `MakeFinalAvatarURL`, `HashedAvatarLink`, etc. This refactor make everything clear:
* user.AvatarLink()
* user.AvatarLinkWithSize(size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFastLink(email, size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFinalLink(email, size)
And many duplicated code are deleted in route handler, the handler and the model share the same avatar logic now.
2021-10-06 07:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
// AvatarLinkWithSize returns a link to the user's avatar with size. size <= 0 means default size
|
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.
But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.
The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
ctx context.Context
data map[any]map[any]any
lock sync.RWMutex
}
var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}
func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
ctx: ctx,
data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
})
}
```
Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.
```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```
Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.
```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return res.SettingValue, nil
})
})
}
```
First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.
An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
|
|
|
func (u *User) AvatarLinkWithSize(ctx context.Context, size int) string {
|
2023-10-20 22:43:08 +08:00
|
|
|
if u.IsGhost() {
|
Avatar refactor, move avatar code from `models` to `models.avatars`, remove duplicated code (#17123)
Why this refactor
The goal is to move most files from `models` package to `models.xxx` package. Many models depend on avatar model, so just move this first.
And the existing logic is not clear, there are too many function like `AvatarLink`, `RelAvatarLink`, `SizedRelAvatarLink`, `SizedAvatarLink`, `MakeFinalAvatarURL`, `HashedAvatarLink`, etc. This refactor make everything clear:
* user.AvatarLink()
* user.AvatarLinkWithSize(size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFastLink(email, size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFinalLink(email, size)
And many duplicated code are deleted in route handler, the handler and the model share the same avatar logic now.
2021-10-06 07:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
return avatars.DefaultAvatarLink()
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Avatar refactor, move avatar code from `models` to `models.avatars`, remove duplicated code (#17123)
Why this refactor
The goal is to move most files from `models` package to `models.xxx` package. Many models depend on avatar model, so just move this first.
And the existing logic is not clear, there are too many function like `AvatarLink`, `RelAvatarLink`, `SizedRelAvatarLink`, `SizedAvatarLink`, `MakeFinalAvatarURL`, `HashedAvatarLink`, etc. This refactor make everything clear:
* user.AvatarLink()
* user.AvatarLinkWithSize(size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFastLink(email, size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFinalLink(email, size)
And many duplicated code are deleted in route handler, the handler and the model share the same avatar logic now.
2021-10-06 07:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
useLocalAvatar := false
|
|
|
|
autoGenerateAvatar := false
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-05 09:08:19 +08:00
|
|
|
disableGravatar := setting.Config().Picture.DisableGravatar.Value(ctx)
|
2022-10-17 07:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
switch {
|
|
|
|
case u.UseCustomAvatar:
|
Avatar refactor, move avatar code from `models` to `models.avatars`, remove duplicated code (#17123)
Why this refactor
The goal is to move most files from `models` package to `models.xxx` package. Many models depend on avatar model, so just move this first.
And the existing logic is not clear, there are too many function like `AvatarLink`, `RelAvatarLink`, `SizedRelAvatarLink`, `SizedAvatarLink`, `MakeFinalAvatarURL`, `HashedAvatarLink`, etc. This refactor make everything clear:
* user.AvatarLink()
* user.AvatarLinkWithSize(size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFastLink(email, size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFinalLink(email, size)
And many duplicated code are deleted in route handler, the handler and the model share the same avatar logic now.
2021-10-06 07:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
useLocalAvatar = true
|
2022-10-17 07:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
case disableGravatar, setting.OfflineMode:
|
Avatar refactor, move avatar code from `models` to `models.avatars`, remove duplicated code (#17123)
Why this refactor
The goal is to move most files from `models` package to `models.xxx` package. Many models depend on avatar model, so just move this first.
And the existing logic is not clear, there are too many function like `AvatarLink`, `RelAvatarLink`, `SizedRelAvatarLink`, `SizedAvatarLink`, `MakeFinalAvatarURL`, `HashedAvatarLink`, etc. This refactor make everything clear:
* user.AvatarLink()
* user.AvatarLinkWithSize(size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFastLink(email, size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFinalLink(email, size)
And many duplicated code are deleted in route handler, the handler and the model share the same avatar logic now.
2021-10-06 07:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
useLocalAvatar = true
|
|
|
|
autoGenerateAvatar = true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if useLocalAvatar {
|
|
|
|
if u.Avatar == "" && autoGenerateAvatar {
|
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.
But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.
The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
ctx context.Context
data map[any]map[any]any
lock sync.RWMutex
}
var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}
func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
ctx: ctx,
data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
})
}
```
Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.
```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```
Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.
```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return res.SettingValue, nil
})
})
}
```
First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.
An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
|
|
|
if err := GenerateRandomAvatar(ctx, u); err != nil {
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
log.Error("GenerateRandomAvatar: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
Avatar refactor, move avatar code from `models` to `models.avatars`, remove duplicated code (#17123)
Why this refactor
The goal is to move most files from `models` package to `models.xxx` package. Many models depend on avatar model, so just move this first.
And the existing logic is not clear, there are too many function like `AvatarLink`, `RelAvatarLink`, `SizedRelAvatarLink`, `SizedAvatarLink`, `MakeFinalAvatarURL`, `HashedAvatarLink`, etc. This refactor make everything clear:
* user.AvatarLink()
* user.AvatarLinkWithSize(size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFastLink(email, size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFinalLink(email, size)
And many duplicated code are deleted in route handler, the handler and the model share the same avatar logic now.
2021-10-06 07:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if u.Avatar == "" {
|
|
|
|
return avatars.DefaultAvatarLink()
|
2021-04-17 06:22:25 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
Avatar refactor, move avatar code from `models` to `models.avatars`, remove duplicated code (#17123)
Why this refactor
The goal is to move most files from `models` package to `models.xxx` package. Many models depend on avatar model, so just move this first.
And the existing logic is not clear, there are too many function like `AvatarLink`, `RelAvatarLink`, `SizedRelAvatarLink`, `SizedAvatarLink`, `MakeFinalAvatarURL`, `HashedAvatarLink`, etc. This refactor make everything clear:
* user.AvatarLink()
* user.AvatarLinkWithSize(size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFastLink(email, size)
* avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFinalLink(email, size)
And many duplicated code are deleted in route handler, the handler and the model share the same avatar logic now.
2021-10-06 07:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
return avatars.GenerateUserAvatarImageLink(u.Avatar, size)
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.
But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.
The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
ctx context.Context
data map[any]map[any]any
lock sync.RWMutex
}
var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}
func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
ctx: ctx,
data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
})
}
```
Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.
```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```
Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.
```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return res.SettingValue, nil
})
})
}
```
First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.
An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
|
|
|
return avatars.GenerateEmailAvatarFastLink(ctx, u.AvatarEmail, size)
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-15 11:44:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// AvatarLink returns the full avatar url with http host.
|
|
|
|
// TODO: refactor it to a relative URL, but it is still used in API response at the moment
|
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.
But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.
The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
ctx context.Context
data map[any]map[any]any
lock sync.RWMutex
}
var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}
func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
ctx: ctx,
data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
})
}
```
Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.
```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```
Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.
```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return res.SettingValue, nil
})
})
}
```
First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.
An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
|
|
|
func (u *User) AvatarLink(ctx context.Context) string {
|
2024-06-15 11:44:44 +08:00
|
|
|
relLink := u.AvatarLinkWithSize(ctx, 0) // it can't be empty
|
|
|
|
return httplib.MakeAbsoluteURL(ctx, relLink)
|
2020-10-14 21:07:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-27 10:39:36 +08:00
|
|
|
// IsUploadAvatarChanged returns true if the current user's avatar would be changed with the provided data
|
|
|
|
func (u *User) IsUploadAvatarChanged(data []byte) bool {
|
|
|
|
if !u.UseCustomAvatar || len(u.Avatar) == 0 {
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
avatarID := fmt.Sprintf("%x", md5.Sum([]byte(fmt.Sprintf("%d-%x", u.ID, md5.Sum(data)))))
|
|
|
|
return u.Avatar != avatarID
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-11-15 16:08:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ExistsWithAvatarAtStoragePath returns true if there is a user with this Avatar
|
|
|
|
func ExistsWithAvatarAtStoragePath(ctx context.Context, storagePath string) (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
// See func (u *User) CustomAvatarRelativePath()
|
|
|
|
// u.Avatar is used directly as the storage path - therefore we can check for existence directly using the path
|
|
|
|
return db.GetEngine(ctx).Where("`avatar`=?", storagePath).Exist(new(User))
|
|
|
|
}
|