gitea/tests/integration/api_pull_review_test.go

486 lines
22 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2020 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package integration
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"testing"
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/json"
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
issue_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/issue"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"xorm.io/builder"
)
func TestAPIPullReview(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
pullIssue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 3})
assert.NoError(t, pullIssue.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: pullIssue.RepoID})
// test ListPullReviews
session := loginUser(t, "user2")
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-05 02:57:16 +08:00
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestf(t, http.MethodGet, "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var reviews []*api.PullReview
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &reviews)
if !assert.Len(t, reviews, 8) {
return
}
for _, r := range reviews {
assert.EqualValues(t, pullIssue.HTMLURL(), r.HTMLPullURL)
}
assert.EqualValues(t, 8, reviews[3].ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, "APPROVED", reviews[3].State)
assert.EqualValues(t, 0, reviews[3].CodeCommentsCount)
2021-06-07 13:27:09 +08:00
assert.True(t, reviews[3].Stale)
assert.False(t, reviews[3].Official)
assert.EqualValues(t, 10, reviews[5].ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, "REQUEST_CHANGES", reviews[5].State)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, reviews[5].CodeCommentsCount)
assert.EqualValues(t, -1, reviews[5].Reviewer.ID) // ghost user
2021-06-07 13:27:09 +08:00
assert.False(t, reviews[5].Stale)
assert.True(t, reviews[5].Official)
// test GetPullReview
req = NewRequestf(t, http.MethodGet, "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, reviews[3].ID).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var review api.PullReview
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &review)
assert.EqualValues(t, *reviews[3], review)
req = NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, reviews[5].ID).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &review)
assert.EqualValues(t, *reviews[5], review)
// test GetPullReviewComments
comment := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Comment{ID: 7})
req = NewRequestf(t, http.MethodGet, "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d/comments", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, 10).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var reviewComments []*api.PullReviewComment
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &reviewComments)
assert.Len(t, reviewComments, 1)
assert.EqualValues(t, "Ghost", reviewComments[0].Poster.UserName)
assert.EqualValues(t, "a review from a deleted user", reviewComments[0].Body)
assert.EqualValues(t, comment.ID, reviewComments[0].ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, comment.UpdatedUnix, reviewComments[0].Updated.Unix())
assert.EqualValues(t, comment.HTMLURL(db.DefaultContext), reviewComments[0].HTMLURL)
// test CreatePullReview
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
Body: "body1",
// Event: "" # will result in PENDING
Comments: []api.CreatePullReviewComment{
{
Path: "README.md",
Body: "first new line",
OldLineNum: 0,
NewLineNum: 1,
}, {
Path: "README.md",
Body: "first old line",
OldLineNum: 1,
NewLineNum: 0,
}, {
Path: "iso-8859-1.txt",
Body: "this line contains a non-utf-8 character",
OldLineNum: 0,
NewLineNum: 1,
},
},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &review)
assert.EqualValues(t, 6, review.ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, "PENDING", review.State)
assert.EqualValues(t, 3, review.CodeCommentsCount)
// test SubmitPullReview
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, review.ID), &api.SubmitPullReviewOptions{
Event: "APPROVED",
Body: "just two nits",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &review)
assert.EqualValues(t, 6, review.ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, "APPROVED", review.State)
assert.EqualValues(t, 3, review.CodeCommentsCount)
// test dismiss review
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d/dismissals", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, review.ID), &api.DismissPullReviewOptions{
Message: "test",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &review)
assert.EqualValues(t, 6, review.ID)
2021-06-07 13:27:09 +08:00
assert.True(t, review.Dismissed)
// test dismiss review
req = NewRequest(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d/undismissals", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, review.ID)).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &review)
assert.EqualValues(t, 6, review.ID)
2021-06-07 13:27:09 +08:00
assert.False(t, review.Dismissed)
// test DeletePullReview
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
Body: "just a comment",
Event: "COMMENT",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &review)
assert.EqualValues(t, "COMMENT", review.State)
assert.EqualValues(t, 0, review.CodeCommentsCount)
req = NewRequestf(t, http.MethodDelete, "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, review.ID).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
// test CreatePullReview Comment without body but with comments
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
// Body: "",
Event: "COMMENT",
Comments: []api.CreatePullReviewComment{
{
Path: "README.md",
Body: "first new line",
OldLineNum: 0,
NewLineNum: 1,
}, {
Path: "README.md",
Body: "first old line",
OldLineNum: 1,
NewLineNum: 0,
},
},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
var commentReview api.PullReview
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &commentReview)
assert.EqualValues(t, "COMMENT", commentReview.State)
assert.EqualValues(t, 2, commentReview.CodeCommentsCount)
assert.Empty(t, commentReview.Body)
assert.False(t, commentReview.Dismissed)
// test CreatePullReview Comment with body but without comments
commentBody := "This is a body of the comment."
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
Body: commentBody,
Event: "COMMENT",
Comments: []api.CreatePullReviewComment{},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &commentReview)
assert.EqualValues(t, "COMMENT", commentReview.State)
assert.EqualValues(t, 0, commentReview.CodeCommentsCount)
assert.EqualValues(t, commentBody, commentReview.Body)
assert.False(t, commentReview.Dismissed)
// test CreatePullReview Comment without body and no comments
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
Body: "",
Event: "COMMENT",
Comments: []api.CreatePullReviewComment{},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
errMap := make(map[string]any)
json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), &errMap)
assert.EqualValues(t, "review event COMMENT requires a body or a comment", errMap["message"].(string))
// test get review requests
// to make it simple, use same api with get review
pullIssue12 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 12})
assert.NoError(t, pullIssue12.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
repo3 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: pullIssue12.RepoID})
req = NewRequestf(t, http.MethodGet, "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo3.OwnerName, repo3.Name, pullIssue12.Index).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &reviews)
assert.EqualValues(t, 11, reviews[0].ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, "REQUEST_REVIEW", reviews[0].State)
assert.EqualValues(t, 0, reviews[0].CodeCommentsCount)
2021-06-07 13:27:09 +08:00
assert.False(t, reviews[0].Stale)
assert.True(t, reviews[0].Official)
assert.EqualValues(t, "test_team", reviews[0].ReviewerTeam.Name)
assert.EqualValues(t, 12, reviews[1].ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, "REQUEST_REVIEW", reviews[1].State)
assert.EqualValues(t, 0, reviews[0].CodeCommentsCount)
2021-06-07 13:27:09 +08:00
assert.False(t, reviews[1].Stale)
assert.True(t, reviews[1].Official)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, reviews[1].Reviewer.ID)
}
func TestAPIPullReviewRequest(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
pullIssue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 3})
assert.NoError(t, pullIssue.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: pullIssue.RepoID})
// Test add Review Request
session := loginUser(t, "user2")
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-05 02:57:16 +08:00
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user4@example.com", "user8"},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
// poster of pr can't be reviewer
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user1"},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
// test user not exist
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"testOther"},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
// Test Remove Review Request
session2 := loginUser(t, "user4")
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-05 02:57:16 +08:00
token2 := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session2, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodDelete, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user4"},
}).AddTokenAuth(token2)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
// doer is not admin
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodDelete, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user8"},
}).AddTokenAuth(token2)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodDelete, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user8"},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
// a collaborator can add/remove a review request
pullIssue21 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 21})
assert.NoError(t, pullIssue21.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
pull21Repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: pullIssue21.RepoID}) // repo60
user38Session := loginUser(t, "user38")
user38Token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, user38Session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", pull21Repo.OwnerName, pull21Repo.Name, pullIssue21.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user4@example.com"},
}).AddTokenAuth(user38Token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodDelete, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", pull21Repo.OwnerName, pull21Repo.Name, pullIssue21.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user4@example.com"},
}).AddTokenAuth(user38Token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
// the poster of the PR can add/remove a review request
user39Session := loginUser(t, "user39")
user39Token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, user39Session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", pull21Repo.OwnerName, pull21Repo.Name, pullIssue21.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user8"},
}).AddTokenAuth(user39Token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodDelete, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", pull21Repo.OwnerName, pull21Repo.Name, pullIssue21.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user8"},
}).AddTokenAuth(user39Token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
// user with read permission on pull requests unit can add/remove a review request
pullIssue22 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 22})
assert.NoError(t, pullIssue22.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
pull22Repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: pullIssue22.RepoID}) // repo61
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", pull22Repo.OwnerName, pull22Repo.Name, pullIssue22.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user38"},
}).AddTokenAuth(user39Token) // user39 is from a team with read permission on pull requests unit
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodDelete, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", pull22Repo.OwnerName, pull22Repo.Name, pullIssue22.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{"user38"},
}).AddTokenAuth(user39Token) // user39 is from a team with read permission on pull requests unit
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
// Test team review request
pullIssue12 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 12})
assert.NoError(t, pullIssue12.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
repo3 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: pullIssue12.RepoID})
// Test add Team Review Request
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo3.OwnerName, repo3.Name, pullIssue12.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
TeamReviewers: []string{"team1", "owners"},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
// Test add Team Review Request to not allowned
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo3.OwnerName, repo3.Name, pullIssue12.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
TeamReviewers: []string{"test_team"},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
// Test add Team Review Request to not exist
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo3.OwnerName, repo3.Name, pullIssue12.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
TeamReviewers: []string{"not_exist_team"},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
// Test Remove team Review Request
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodDelete, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo3.OwnerName, repo3.Name, pullIssue12.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
TeamReviewers: []string{"team1"},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
// empty request test
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo3.OwnerName, repo3.Name, pullIssue12.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{}).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodDelete, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo3.OwnerName, repo3.Name, pullIssue12.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{}).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
}
func TestAPIPullReviewStayDismissed(t *testing.T) {
// This test against issue https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28542
// where old reviews surface after a review request got dismissed.
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
pullIssue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 3})
assert.NoError(t, pullIssue.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: pullIssue.RepoID})
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
session2 := loginUser(t, user2.LoginName)
token2 := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session2, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
user8 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 8})
session8 := loginUser(t, user8.LoginName)
token8 := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session8, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
// user2 request user8
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{user8.LoginName},
}).AddTokenAuth(token2)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
reviewsCountCheck(t,
"check we have only one review request",
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 0, 1, 1, false)
// user2 request user8 again, it is expected to be ignored
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{user8.LoginName},
}).AddTokenAuth(token2)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
reviewsCountCheck(t,
"check we have only one review request, even after re-request it again",
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 0, 1, 1, false)
// user8 reviews it as accept
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
Event: "APPROVED",
Body: "lgtm",
}).AddTokenAuth(token8)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
reviewsCountCheck(t,
"check we have one valid approval",
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 0, 0, 1, true)
// emulate of auto-dismiss lgtm on a protected branch that where a pull just got an update
_, err := db.GetEngine(db.DefaultContext).Where("issue_id = ? AND reviewer_id = ?", pullIssue.ID, user8.ID).
Cols("dismissed").Update(&issues_model.Review{Dismissed: true})
assert.NoError(t, err)
// user2 request user8 again
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
Reviewers: []string{user8.LoginName},
}).AddTokenAuth(token2)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
reviewsCountCheck(t,
"check we have no valid approval and one review request",
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 1, 1, 2, false)
// user8 dismiss review
_, err = issue_service.ReviewRequest(db.DefaultContext, pullIssue, user8, user8, false)
assert.NoError(t, err)
reviewsCountCheck(t,
"check new review request is now dismissed",
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 1, 0, 1, false)
// add a new valid approval
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
Event: "APPROVED",
Body: "lgtm",
}).AddTokenAuth(token8)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
reviewsCountCheck(t,
"check that old reviews requests are deleted",
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 1, 0, 2, true)
// now add a change request witch should dismiss the approval
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
Event: "REQUEST_CHANGES",
Body: "please change XYZ",
}).AddTokenAuth(token8)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
reviewsCountCheck(t,
"check that old reviews are dismissed",
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 2, 0, 3, false)
}
func reviewsCountCheck(t *testing.T, name string, issueID, reviewerID int64, expectedDismissed, expectedRequested, expectedTotal int, expectApproval bool) {
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{
"issue_id": issueID,
"reviewer_id": reviewerID,
"dismissed": true,
}, expectedDismissed)
unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{
"issue_id": issueID,
"reviewer_id": reviewerID,
}, expectedTotal)
unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{
"issue_id": issueID,
"reviewer_id": reviewerID,
"type": issues_model.ReviewTypeRequest,
}, expectedRequested)
approvalCount := 0
if expectApproval {
approvalCount = 1
}
unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{
"issue_id": issueID,
"reviewer_id": reviewerID,
"type": issues_model.ReviewTypeApprove,
"dismissed": false,
}, approvalCount)
})
}