gitea/services/oauth2_provider/access_token.go

260 lines
8.7 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2024 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package oauth2_provider //nolint
import (
"context"
"fmt"
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 12:06:41 +08:00
"slices"
"strings"
auth "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
org_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/organization"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
"github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5"
)
// AccessTokenErrorCode represents an error code specified in RFC 6749
// https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-5.2
type AccessTokenErrorCode string
const (
// AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidRequest represents an error code specified in RFC 6749
AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidRequest AccessTokenErrorCode = "invalid_request"
// AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidClient represents an error code specified in RFC 6749
AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidClient = "invalid_client"
// AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidGrant represents an error code specified in RFC 6749
AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidGrant = "invalid_grant"
// AccessTokenErrorCodeUnauthorizedClient represents an error code specified in RFC 6749
AccessTokenErrorCodeUnauthorizedClient = "unauthorized_client"
// AccessTokenErrorCodeUnsupportedGrantType represents an error code specified in RFC 6749
AccessTokenErrorCodeUnsupportedGrantType = "unsupported_grant_type"
// AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidScope represents an error code specified in RFC 6749
AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidScope = "invalid_scope"
)
// AccessTokenError represents an error response specified in RFC 6749
// https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-5.2
type AccessTokenError struct {
ErrorCode AccessTokenErrorCode `json:"error" form:"error"`
ErrorDescription string `json:"error_description"`
}
// Error returns the error message
func (err AccessTokenError) Error() string {
return fmt.Sprintf("%s: %s", err.ErrorCode, err.ErrorDescription)
}
// TokenType specifies the kind of token
type TokenType string
const (
// TokenTypeBearer represents a token type specified in RFC 6749
TokenTypeBearer TokenType = "bearer"
// TokenTypeMAC represents a token type specified in RFC 6749
TokenTypeMAC = "mac"
)
// AccessTokenResponse represents a successful access token response
// https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-4.2.2
type AccessTokenResponse struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType TokenType `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
IDToken string `json:"id_token,omitempty"`
}
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 12:06:41 +08:00
// GrantAdditionalScopes returns valid scopes coming from grant
func GrantAdditionalScopes(grantScopes string) auth.AccessTokenScope {
// scopes_supported from templates/user/auth/oidc_wellknown.tmpl
generalScopesSupported := []string{
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 12:06:41 +08:00
"openid",
"profile",
"email",
"groups",
}
var accessScopes []string // the scopes for access control, but not for general information
for _, scope := range strings.Split(grantScopes, " ") {
if scope != "" && !slices.Contains(generalScopesSupported, scope) {
accessScopes = append(accessScopes, scope)
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 12:06:41 +08:00
}
}
// since version 1.22, access tokens grant full access to the API
// with this access is reduced only if additional scopes are provided
if len(accessScopes) > 0 {
accessTokenScope := auth.AccessTokenScope(strings.Join(accessScopes, ","))
if normalizedAccessTokenScope, err := accessTokenScope.Normalize(); err == nil {
return normalizedAccessTokenScope
}
// TODO: if there are invalid access scopes (err != nil),
// then it is treated as "all", maybe in the future we should make it stricter to return an error
// at the moment, to avoid breaking 1.22 behavior, invalid tokens are also treated as "all"
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 12:06:41 +08:00
}
// fallback, empty access scope is treated as "all" access
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 12:06:41 +08:00
return auth.AccessTokenScopeAll
}
func NewAccessTokenResponse(ctx context.Context, grant *auth.OAuth2Grant, serverKey, clientKey JWTSigningKey) (*AccessTokenResponse, *AccessTokenError) {
if setting.OAuth2.InvalidateRefreshTokens {
if err := grant.IncreaseCounter(ctx); err != nil {
return nil, &AccessTokenError{
ErrorCode: AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidGrant,
ErrorDescription: "cannot increase the grant counter",
}
}
}
// generate access token to access the API
expirationDate := timeutil.TimeStampNow().Add(setting.OAuth2.AccessTokenExpirationTime)
accessToken := &Token{
GrantID: grant.ID,
Kind: KindAccessToken,
RegisteredClaims: jwt.RegisteredClaims{
ExpiresAt: jwt.NewNumericDate(expirationDate.AsTime()),
},
}
signedAccessToken, err := accessToken.SignToken(serverKey)
if err != nil {
return nil, &AccessTokenError{
ErrorCode: AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidRequest,
ErrorDescription: "cannot sign token",
}
}
// generate refresh token to request an access token after it expired later
refreshExpirationDate := timeutil.TimeStampNow().Add(setting.OAuth2.RefreshTokenExpirationTime * 60 * 60).AsTime()
refreshToken := &Token{
GrantID: grant.ID,
Counter: grant.Counter,
Kind: KindRefreshToken,
RegisteredClaims: jwt.RegisteredClaims{
ExpiresAt: jwt.NewNumericDate(refreshExpirationDate),
},
}
signedRefreshToken, err := refreshToken.SignToken(serverKey)
if err != nil {
return nil, &AccessTokenError{
ErrorCode: AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidRequest,
ErrorDescription: "cannot sign token",
}
}
// generate OpenID Connect id_token
signedIDToken := ""
if grant.ScopeContains("openid") {
app, err := auth.GetOAuth2ApplicationByID(ctx, grant.ApplicationID)
if err != nil {
return nil, &AccessTokenError{
ErrorCode: AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidRequest,
ErrorDescription: "cannot find application",
}
}
user, err := user_model.GetUserByID(ctx, grant.UserID)
if err != nil {
if user_model.IsErrUserNotExist(err) {
return nil, &AccessTokenError{
ErrorCode: AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidRequest,
ErrorDescription: "cannot find user",
}
}
log.Error("Error loading user: %v", err)
return nil, &AccessTokenError{
ErrorCode: AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidRequest,
ErrorDescription: "server error",
}
}
idToken := &OIDCToken{
RegisteredClaims: jwt.RegisteredClaims{
ExpiresAt: jwt.NewNumericDate(expirationDate.AsTime()),
Issuer: setting.AppURL,
Audience: []string{app.ClientID},
Subject: fmt.Sprint(grant.UserID),
},
Nonce: grant.Nonce,
}
if grant.ScopeContains("profile") {
idToken.Name = user.DisplayName()
idToken.PreferredUsername = user.Name
idToken.Profile = user.HTMLURL()
idToken.Picture = user.AvatarLink(ctx)
idToken.Website = user.Website
idToken.Locale = user.Language
idToken.UpdatedAt = user.UpdatedUnix
}
if grant.ScopeContains("email") {
idToken.Email = user.Email
idToken.EmailVerified = user.IsActive
}
if grant.ScopeContains("groups") {
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 12:06:41 +08:00
accessTokenScope := GrantAdditionalScopes(grant.Scope)
// since version 1.22 does not verify if groups should be public-only,
// onlyPublicGroups will be set only if 'public-only' is included in a valid scope
onlyPublicGroups, _ := accessTokenScope.PublicOnly()
groups, err := GetOAuthGroupsForUser(ctx, user, onlyPublicGroups)
if err != nil {
log.Error("Error getting groups: %v", err)
return nil, &AccessTokenError{
ErrorCode: AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidRequest,
ErrorDescription: "server error",
}
}
idToken.Groups = groups
}
signedIDToken, err = idToken.SignToken(clientKey)
if err != nil {
return nil, &AccessTokenError{
ErrorCode: AccessTokenErrorCodeInvalidRequest,
ErrorDescription: "cannot sign token",
}
}
}
return &AccessTokenResponse{
AccessToken: signedAccessToken,
TokenType: TokenTypeBearer,
ExpiresIn: setting.OAuth2.AccessTokenExpirationTime,
RefreshToken: signedRefreshToken,
IDToken: signedIDToken,
}, nil
}
// returns a list of "org" and "org:team" strings,
// that the given user is a part of.
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 12:06:41 +08:00
func GetOAuthGroupsForUser(ctx context.Context, user *user_model.User, onlyPublicGroups bool) ([]string, error) {
orgs, err := db.Find[org_model.Organization](ctx, org_model.FindOrgOptions{
UserID: user.ID,
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 12:06:41 +08:00
IncludePrivate: !onlyPublicGroups,
})
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("GetUserOrgList: %w", err)
}
orgTeams, err := org_model.OrgList(orgs).LoadTeams(ctx)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("LoadTeams: %w", err)
}
var groups []string
for _, org := range orgs {
groups = append(groups, org.Name)
for _, team := range orgTeams[org.ID] {
if team.IsMember(ctx, user.ID) {
groups = append(groups, org.Name+":"+team.LowerName)
}
}
}
return groups, nil
}