mirror of
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git
synced 2024-11-25 09:08:12 +08:00
Fix queue test (#30646)
Fix #30643 The old test code is not stable due to the data-race described in the TODO added at that time. Make it stable, and remove a debug-only field from old test code.
This commit is contained in:
parent
99c5683da5
commit
e6103955cc
|
@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ func (q *WorkerPoolQueue[T]) doDispatchBatchToWorker(wg *workerGroup[T], flushCh
|
|||
// TODO: the logic could be improved in the future, to avoid a data-race between "doStartNewWorker" and "workerNum"
|
||||
// The root problem is that if we skip "doStartNewWorker" here, the "workerNum" might be decreased by other workers later
|
||||
// So ideally, it should check whether there are enough workers by some approaches, and start new workers if necessary.
|
||||
// This data-race is not serious, as long as a new worker will be started soon to make sure there are enough workers,
|
||||
// so no need to hugely refactor at the moment.
|
||||
q.workerNumMu.Lock()
|
||||
noWorker := q.workerNum == 0
|
||||
if full || noWorker {
|
||||
|
@ -136,6 +138,14 @@ func (q *WorkerPoolQueue[T]) basePushForShutdown(items ...T) bool {
|
|||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func resetIdleTicker(t *time.Ticker, dur time.Duration) {
|
||||
t.Reset(dur)
|
||||
select {
|
||||
case <-t.C:
|
||||
default:
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// doStartNewWorker starts a new worker for the queue, the worker reads from worker's channel and handles the items.
|
||||
func (q *WorkerPoolQueue[T]) doStartNewWorker(wp *workerGroup[T]) {
|
||||
wp.wg.Add(1)
|
||||
|
@ -146,8 +156,6 @@ func (q *WorkerPoolQueue[T]) doStartNewWorker(wp *workerGroup[T]) {
|
|||
log.Debug("Queue %q starts new worker", q.GetName())
|
||||
defer log.Debug("Queue %q stops idle worker", q.GetName())
|
||||
|
||||
atomic.AddInt32(&q.workerStartedCounter, 1) // Only increase counter, used for debugging
|
||||
|
||||
t := time.NewTicker(workerIdleDuration)
|
||||
defer t.Stop()
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -169,11 +177,7 @@ func (q *WorkerPoolQueue[T]) doStartNewWorker(wp *workerGroup[T]) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
q.doWorkerHandle(batch)
|
||||
// reset the idle ticker, and drain the tick after reset in case a tick is already triggered
|
||||
t.Reset(workerIdleDuration)
|
||||
select {
|
||||
case <-t.C:
|
||||
default:
|
||||
}
|
||||
resetIdleTicker(t, workerIdleDuration) // key code for TestWorkerPoolQueueWorkerIdleReset
|
||||
case <-t.C:
|
||||
q.workerNumMu.Lock()
|
||||
keepWorking = q.workerNum <= 1 // keep the last worker running
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ type WorkerPoolQueue[T any] struct {
|
|||
workerMaxNum int
|
||||
workerActiveNum int
|
||||
workerNumMu sync.Mutex
|
||||
|
||||
workerStartedCounter int32
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type flushType chan struct{}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5,8 +5,10 @@ package queue
|
|||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"context"
|
||||
"slices"
|
||||
"strconv"
|
||||
"sync"
|
||||
"sync/atomic"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
"time"
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -250,23 +252,34 @@ func TestWorkerPoolQueueShutdown(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
||||
func TestWorkerPoolQueueWorkerIdleReset(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
defer test.MockVariableValue(&workerIdleDuration, 10*time.Millisecond)()
|
||||
defer mockBackoffDuration(10 * time.Millisecond)()
|
||||
defer mockBackoffDuration(5 * time.Millisecond)()
|
||||
|
||||
var q *WorkerPoolQueue[int]
|
||||
var handledCount atomic.Int32
|
||||
var hasOnlyOneWorkerRunning atomic.Bool
|
||||
handler := func(items ...int) (unhandled []int) {
|
||||
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
|
||||
handledCount.Add(int32(len(items)))
|
||||
// make each work have different duration, and check the active worker number periodically
|
||||
var activeNums []int
|
||||
for i := 0; i < 5-items[0]%2; i++ {
|
||||
time.Sleep(workerIdleDuration * 2)
|
||||
activeNums = append(activeNums, q.GetWorkerActiveNumber())
|
||||
}
|
||||
// When the queue never becomes empty, the existing workers should keep working
|
||||
// It is not 100% true at the moment because the data-race in workergroup.go is not resolved, see that TODO */
|
||||
// If the "active worker numbers" is like [2 2 ... 1 1], it means that an existing worker exited and the no new worker is started.
|
||||
if slices.Equal([]int{1, 1}, activeNums[len(activeNums)-2:]) {
|
||||
hasOnlyOneWorkerRunning.Store(true)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
q, _ := newWorkerPoolQueueForTest("test-workpoolqueue", setting.QueueSettings{Type: "channel", BatchLength: 1, MaxWorkers: 2, Length: 100}, handler, false)
|
||||
q, _ = newWorkerPoolQueueForTest("test-workpoolqueue", setting.QueueSettings{Type: "channel", BatchLength: 1, MaxWorkers: 2, Length: 100}, handler, false)
|
||||
stop := runWorkerPoolQueue(q)
|
||||
for i := 0; i < 20; i++ {
|
||||
for i := 0; i < 100; i++ {
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, q.Push(i))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
time.Sleep(500 * time.Millisecond)
|
||||
assert.EqualValues(t, 2, q.GetWorkerNumber())
|
||||
assert.EqualValues(t, 2, q.GetWorkerActiveNumber())
|
||||
// when the queue never becomes empty, the existing workers should keep working
|
||||
assert.EqualValues(t, 2, q.workerStartedCounter)
|
||||
assert.Greater(t, int(handledCount.Load()), 4) // make sure there are enough items handled during the test
|
||||
assert.False(t, hasOnlyOneWorkerRunning.Load(), "a slow handler should not block other workers from starting")
|
||||
stop()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user