Commit Graph

24 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
6543
846f618716
Add priority to protected branch (#32286)
Some checks are pending
release-nightly / nightly-binary (push) Waiting to run
release-nightly / nightly-docker-rootful (push) Waiting to run
release-nightly / nightly-docker-rootless (push) Waiting to run
## Solves

Currently for rules to re-order them you have to alter the creation
date. so you basicly have to delete and recreate them in the right
order. This is more than just inconvinient ...

## Solution

Add a new col for prioritization

## Demo WebUI Video

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92182a31-9705-4ac5-b6e3-9bb74108cbd1


---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
2024-11-27 05:41:06 +01:00
Tim
de2ad2e1b1
Make admins adhere to branch protection rules (#32248)
This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.

Fixes #17131

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-10-23 12:39:43 +08:00
charles-plutohealth
7c6edf1ba0
Fix /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/files endpoint not populating previous_filename (#32017)
---
`status == "rename"` should have read `status == "renamed"`. The typo
means that file.PreviousFilename would never be populated, which e.g.
breaks usage of the Github Action at
https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter.
2024-09-12 01:29:27 +08:00
Denys Konovalov
a8d0c879c3
add skip secondary authorization option for public oauth2 clients (#31454) 2024-07-19 14:28:30 -04:00
Henry Goodman
12cb1d2998
Allow force push to protected branches (#28086)
Fixes #22722 

### Problem
Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).

The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.

### Solution
Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.

It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.

This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)

This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`

### Updated Branch Protection UI:

<img width="943" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">

### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source
branch `test` being a protected branch:


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/e018e6e9-b7b2-4bd3-808e-4947d7da35cc)
<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-07-05 18:21:56 +00:00
mzroot
d4e4226c3c
Add tag protection via rest api #17862 (#31295)
Add tag protection manage via rest API.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alexander Kogay <kogay.a@citilink.ru>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-06-14 18:56:10 +02:00
Chester
6709e28da7
Add API endpoints for getting action jobs status (#26673)
Sample of response, it is similar to Github actions

ref
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/workflow-runs?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-workflow-runs-for-a-repository

``` json
{
    "workflow_runs": [
        {
            "id": 3,
            "name": "Explore-Gitea-Actions",
            "head_branch": "main",
            "head_sha": "6d8d29a9f7a01ded8f8aeb64341cb31ee1ab5f19",
            "run_number": 3,
            "event": "push",
            "display_title": "More job",
            "status": "success",
            "workflow_id": "demo2.yaml",
            "url": "/chester/test/actions/runs/3",
            "created_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:33-04:00",
            "updated_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:37-04:00",
            "run_started_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:33-04:00"
        },
        {
            "id": 2,
            "name": "Explore-Gitea-Actions",
            "head_branch": "main",
            "head_sha": "6d8d29a9f7a01ded8f8aeb64341cb31ee1ab5f19",
            "run_number": 2,
            "event": "push",
            "display_title": "More job",
            "status": "success",
            "workflow_id": "demo.yaml",
            "url": "/chester/test/actions/runs/2",
            "created_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:30-04:00",
            "updated_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:33-04:00",
            "run_started_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:30-04:00"
        },
        {
            "id": 1,
            "name": "Explore-Gitea-Actions",
            "head_branch": "main",
            "head_sha": "e5369ab054cae79899ba36e45ee82811a6e0acd5",
            "run_number": 1,
            "event": "push",
            "display_title": "Add job",
            "status": "failure",
            "workflow_id": "demo.yaml",
            "url": "/chester/test/actions/runs/1",
            "created_at": "2023-08-22T13:15:21-04:00",
            "updated_at": "2023-08-22T13:18:10-04:00",
            "run_started_at": "2023-08-22T13:15:21-04:00"
        }
    ],
    "total_count": 3
}
```

---------

Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: puni9869 <80308335+puni9869@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-05-01 09:40:23 +08:00
wxiaoguang
3feba9f1f4
Allow everyone to read or write a wiki by a repo unit setting (#30495)
Replace #6312
Help #5833
Wiki solution for #639
2024-04-17 15:58:37 +00:00
Edward Zhang
02e183bf3f
Fix branch_protection api shows users/teams who has no readAccess (#30291)
Add some logic in `convert.ToBranchProtection` to return only the names
associated with readAccess instead of returning all names. This will
ensure consistency in behavior between the frontend and backend.
Fixes: #27694

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: wenzhuo.zhang <wenzhuo.zhang@geely.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-04-17 15:24:07 +02:00
Jimmy Praet
5d3fdd1212
Add branch protection setting for ignoring stale approvals (#28498)
Fixes #27114.

* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.

For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.

So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 07:20:01 +00:00
KN4CK3R
595a9291b6
Fix convert.ToTeams on empty input (#28426)
Fixes #28420

Don't return `nil` if the input was empty.
2024-01-11 22:12:08 +00:00
JakobDev
cc5df26680
Even more db.DefaultContext refactor (#27352)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-10-03 10:30:41 +00:00
JakobDev
7047df36d4
Another round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27103)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-09-25 13:17:37 +00:00
JakobDev
76659b1114
Reduce usage of db.DefaultContext (#27073)
Part of #27065

This reduces the usage of `db.DefaultContext`. I think I've got enough
files for the first PR. When this is merged, I will continue working on
this.

Considering how many files this PR affect, I hope it won't take to long
to merge, so I don't end up in the merge conflict hell.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-14 17:09:32 +00:00
JakobDev
6598d0291c
Allow Organisations to have a E-Mail (#25082)
Resolves #25057

This adds a E-Mail field to Organisations. The E-Mail is just shown on
the Profile when it is visited by a logged in User. The E-mail is not
used for something else.

**Screenshots:**

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15185051/a8d622b3-7278-4c08-984b-9c5ebfdb5471)

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15185051/6dcb1dd7-d04b-49eb-bc96-6582cfe9757b)

---------

Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <privat@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-25 08:26:27 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
b167f35113
Add context parameter to some database functions (#26055)
To avoid deadlock problem, almost database related functions should be
have ctx as the first parameter.
This PR do a refactor for some of these functions.
2023-07-22 22:14:27 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
6e19484f4d
Sync branches into databases (#22743)
Related #14180
Related #25233 
Related #22639
Close #19786
Related #12763 

This PR will change all the branches retrieve method from reading git
data to read database to reduce git read operations.

- [x] Sync git branches information into database when push git data
- [x] Create a new table `Branch`, merge some columns of `DeletedBranch`
into `Branch` table and drop the table `DeletedBranch`.
- [x] Read `Branch` table when visit `code` -> `branch` page
- [x] Read `Branch` table when list branch names in `code` page dropdown
- [x] Read `Branch` table when list git ref compare page
- [x] Provide a button in admin page to manually sync all branches.
- [x] Sync branches if repository is not empty but database branches are
empty when visiting pages with branches list
- [x] Use `commit_time desc` as the default FindBranch order by to keep
consistent as before and deleted branches will be always at the end.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-06-29 10:03:20 +00:00
techknowlogick
d56bb74201
add admin API email endpoints (#22792)
add email endpoint to admin API to ensure API parity with admin
dashboard.
2023-03-14 03:54:40 -04:00
yp05327
7eaf192967
Rename GetUnits to LoadUnits (#22970)
Same as https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22967

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-19 16:31:39 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
bd820aa9c5
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.

But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.

The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
	ctx  context.Context
	data map[any]map[any]any
        lock sync.RWMutex
}

var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}

func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
	return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
		ctx:  ctx,
		data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
	})
}
```

Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.

```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```

Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.

```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
	return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
		return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
			res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
			if err != nil {
				return "", err
			}
			return res.SettingValue, nil
		})
	})
}
```

First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.

An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
2782c14396
Supports wildcard protected branch (#20825)
This PR introduce glob match for protected branch name. The separator is
`/` and you can use `*` matching non-separator chars and use `**` across
separator.

It also supports input an exist or non-exist branch name as matching
condition and branch name condition has high priority than glob rule.

Should fix #2529 and #15705

screenshots

<img width="1160" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/205651179-ebb5492a-4ade-4bb4-a13c-965e8c927063.png">

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-16 16:00:22 +08:00
Jason Song
7adc2de464
Use context parameter in models/git (#22367)
After #22362, we can feel free to use transactions without
`db.DefaultContext`.

And there are still lots of models using `db.DefaultContext`, I think we
should refactor them carefully and one by one.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-09 11:50:54 +08:00
delvh
0f4e1b9ac6
Restructure webhook module (#22256)
Previously, there was an `import services/webhooks` inside
`modules/notification/webhook`.
This import was removed (after fighting against many import cycles).
Additionally, `modules/notification/webhook` was moved to
`modules/webhook`,
and a few structs/constants were extracted from `models/webhooks` to
`modules/webhook`.

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-01 23:23:15 +08:00
KN4CK3R
a35749893b
Move convert package to services (#22264)
Addition to #22256

The `convert` package relies heavily on different models which is
[disallowed by our definition of
modules](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#design-guideline).
This helps to prevent possible import cycles.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-29 10:57:15 +08:00