Regression of #29493. If a branch has been deleted, repushing it won't
restore it.
Lunny may have noticed that, but I didn't delve into the comment then
overlooked it:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29493#discussion_r1509046867
The additional comments added are to explain the issue I found during
testing, which are unrelated to the fixes.
- Switched from jQuery `.attr` to plain javascript `.getAttribute`
- Tested the user search box and it works as before
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
- Switched from jQuery `.attr` to plain javascript `.getAttribute`
- Tested the archive download and compare page branch selector
functionality and it works as before
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
- Switched from jQuery `.attr` to plain javascript `.setAttribute`
- Tested the image diff functionality and it works as before
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
- Switched from jQuery `.attr` to plain javascript `.getAttribute`
- Tested the quick pull request button text change functionality and it
works as before
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
- Switched from jQuery `.attr` to plain javascript `.getAttribute`
- Tested the issue author dropdown functionality and it works as before
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Tested all functionality. There is a [pre-existing
bug](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/29853) when moving a
project panels which is not caused by this refactoring.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
The error message:
`editor.file_changed_while_editing = The file contents have changed
since you started editing. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
href="%s">Click here</a> to see them or <strong>Commit Changes
again</strong> to overwrite them.`
Is re-used in inappropriate contexts. The link in the key goes to a 404
when the key is used in a situation where the file contents have not
changed.
Added two new keys to differentiate commit id mismatch and push out of
date conditions.
- Move some scripts from `build` to new `tools` dir. Eventually i would
like to move all but let's do it step-by-step.
- Add dir to eslint and move the files into vars.
- Update docs accordingly.
- While updating docs I noticed we were incorrectly having `public/img`
path still in a few places. Replace those with the current
`public/assets/img`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nanguan Lin <nanguanlin6@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
When logged out, the checkboxes are not there on the issue/pr lists,
which would cause an error here.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/29862
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
1. The borders were doubled on the "empty" page, fix it.
2. Remove unnecessary CSS classes like "clone", "compact", etc
3. Use CSS class "clone-panel" instead of ID "clone-panel"
4. Use `tw-flex-1` instead of `gt-f1`
5. Remove unnecessary ID "more-btn"
Came to the conclusion that a simple format Readme is easier to read
than the previous fancy centered stuff.
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Previously, the citation js would load every time when opening a citable
repo. Now it only loads when the user clicks the button for it. The
loading state is representend with a spinner on the button:
<img width="83" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-17 at 00 25 13"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/29649089-13f3-4974-ab81-e12c0f8e651f">
Diff ist best viewed with whitespace hidden.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Fix#20175
Current implementation of API does not allow creating pull requests
between branches of the same
repo when you specify *namespace* (owner of the repo) in `head` field in
http request body.
---
Although GitHub implementation of API allows performing such action and
since Gitea targeting
compatibility with GitHub API I see it as an appropriate change.
I'm proposing a fix to the described problem and test case which covers
this logic.
My use-case just in case:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/20175#issuecomment-1711283022
The issue checkbox code received a few more cleanups and I specifically
tested it. The other changes are trivial. Also, I checked the cases for
how many elements match the jQuery selection to determine querySelector
vs. querySelectorAll.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
