github-mirror/lkmpg
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sysprog21/lkmpg.git synced 2024-11-22 09:02:10 +08:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix switch-case condition error in sample code (#245)

Browse Source 
The code 'case -EINPROGRESS || -EBUSY: ' is the same as
'case -115 || -16 :' at compiler time, as both error code are
implemented with macro like '#define EBUSY 16'.

The code above is essentially the same as 'case 1:'. In C, there is no
real boolean value. Boolean-like value will be converted to 1 or 0.

It does not matter too much if the '-EINPROGRESS || -EBUSY' is
calculated at build time or at runtime. In both case, it will compare
the 'rc' with 1 in the switch expression. It will not compare the
'rc' with any real error code number. When the code is really '-EBUSY',
the execution will fallback to the default branch.

And in practice, most of the compilers will do this simple compile-time
static calculation, and generate code like

static int test_skcipher_result(struct skcipher_def *sk, int rc)
{
    switch (rc) {
    case 0:
        break;
    case 1:
        rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&sk->result.completion);
/* code removed for conciseness */
        break;
    default:
        pr_info("skcipher encrypt returned with %d result %d\n", rc,
                sk->result.err);
        break;
    }
    init_completion(&sk->result.completion);
    return rc;
}
This commit is contained in:
毛毛 2024-01-03 22:13:26 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 391f111d8a
commit 470fbcd97d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
examples/cryptosk.c
View File

@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static int test_skcipher_result(struct skcipher_def *sk, int rc)
switch (rc) { switch (rc) {
case 0: case 0:
break; break;
case -EINPROGRESS || -EBUSY: case -EINPROGRESS:
case -EBUSY:
rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&sk->result.completion); rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&sk->result.completion);
if (!rc && !sk->result.err) { if (!rc && !sk->result.err) {
reinit_completion(&sk->result.completion); reinit_completion(&sk->result.completion);