add basic setup section

This commit is contained in:
Antonio SJ Musumeci 2020-04-05 12:21:02 -04:00
parent be3499ee56
commit 7c37a69d25
2 changed files with 43 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ mergerfs -o<options> <branches> <mountpoint>
* supports POSIX ACLs
# How it works
# HOW IT WORKS
mergerfs logically merges multiple paths together. Think a union of sets. The file/s or directory/s acted on or presented through mergerfs are based on the policy chosen for that particular action. Read more about policies below.
@ -62,6 +62,21 @@ A + B = C
mergerfs does **not** support the copy-on-write (CoW) behavior found in **aufs** and **overlayfs**. You can **not** mount a read-only filesystem and write to it. However, mergerfs will ignore read-only drives when creating new files so you can mix read-write and read-only drives. It also does **not** split data across drives. It is not RAID0 / striping. It is simply a union.
# BASIC SETUP
If you don't already know that you have a special use case then just start with one of the following option sets.
#### You don't need `mmap`
`use_ino,cache.files=off,dropcacheonclose=true,allow_other,category.create=mfs`
#### You do need `mmap` (used by rtorrent and some other programs)
`use_ino,cache.files=partial,dropcacheonclose=true,allow_other,category.create=mfs`
See the mergerfs [wiki for real world deployments](https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs/wiki/Real-World-Deployments) for comparisons / ideas.
# OPTIONS
### mount options
@ -642,11 +657,12 @@ done
# PERFORMANCE
mergerfs is at its core just a proxy and therefore its theoretical max performance is that of the underlying devices. However, given it is a FUSE filesystem working from userspace there is an increase in overhead relative to kernel based solutions. That said the performance can match the theoretical max but it depends greatly on the system's configuration. Especially when adding network filesystems into the mix there are many variables which can impact performance. Drive speeds and latency, network speeds and latency, general concurrency, read/write sizes, etc. Unfortunately, given the number of variables it has been difficult to find a single set of settings which provide optimal performance. If you're having performance issues please look over the suggestions below.
mergerfs is at its core just a proxy and therefore its theoretical max performance is that of the underlying devices. However, given it is a FUSE filesystem working from userspace there is an increase in overhead relative to kernel based solutions. That said the performance can match the theoretical max but it depends greatly on the system's configuration. Especially when adding network filesystems into the mix there are many variables which can impact performance. Drive speeds and latency, network speeds and latency, general concurrency, read/write sizes, etc. Unfortunately, given the number of variables it has been difficult to find a single set of settings which provide optimal performance. If you're having performance issues please look over the suggestions below (including the benchmarking section.)
NOTE: be sure to read about these features before changing them
NOTE: be sure to read about these features before changing them to understand what behaviors it may impact
* enable (or disable) `splice_move`, `splice_read`, and `splice_write`
* disable `security_capability` and/or `xattr`
* increase cache timeouts `cache.attr`, `cache.entry`, `cache.negative_entry`
* enable (or disable) page caching (`cache.files`)
* enable `cache.writeback`
@ -655,13 +671,12 @@ NOTE: be sure to read about these features before changing them
* enable `cache.symlinks`
* enable `cache.readdir`
* change the number of worker threads
* disable `security_capability` and/or `xattr`
* disable `posix_acl`
* disable `async_read`
* test theoretical performance using `nullrw` or mounting a ram disk
* use `symlinkify` if your data is largely static
* use `symlinkify` if your data is largely static and read-only
* use tiered cache drives
* use lvm and lvm cache to place a SSD in front of your HDDs
* use LVM and LVM cache to place a SSD in front of your HDDs
If you come across a setting that significantly impacts performance please contact trapexit so he may investigate further.

View File

@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Can turn read\-only files into symlinks to underlying file
Hard link copy\-on\-write / CoW
.IP \[bu] 2
supports POSIX ACLs
.SH How it works
.SH HOW IT WORKS
.PP
mergerfs logically merges multiple paths together.
Think a union of sets.
@ -82,6 +82,20 @@ so you can mix read\-write and read\-only drives.
It also does \f[B]not\f[] split data across drives.
It is not RAID0 / striping.
It is simply a union.
.SH BASIC SETUP
.PP
If you don\[aq]t already know that you have a special use case then just
start with one of the following option sets.
.SS You don\[aq]t need \f[C]mmap\f[]
.PP
\f[C]use_ino,cache.files=off,dropcacheonclose=true,allow_other,category.create=mfs\f[]
.SS You do need \f[C]mmap\f[] (used by rtorrent and some other programs)
.PP
\f[C]use_ino,cache.files=partial,dropcacheonclose=true,allow_other,category.create=mfs\f[]
.PP
See the mergerfs wiki for real world
deployments (https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs/wiki/Real-World-Deployments)
for comparisons / ideas.
.SH OPTIONS
.SS mount options
.IP \[bu] 2
@ -1406,13 +1420,16 @@ concurrency, read/write sizes, etc.
Unfortunately, given the number of variables it has been difficult to
find a single set of settings which provide optimal performance.
If you\[aq]re having performance issues please look over the suggestions
below.
below (including the benchmarking section.)
.PP
NOTE: be sure to read about these features before changing them
NOTE: be sure to read about these features before changing them to
understand what behaviors it may impact
.IP \[bu] 2
enable (or disable) \f[C]splice_move\f[], \f[C]splice_read\f[], and
\f[C]splice_write\f[]
.IP \[bu] 2
disable \f[C]security_capability\f[] and/or \f[C]xattr\f[]
.IP \[bu] 2
increase cache timeouts \f[C]cache.attr\f[], \f[C]cache.entry\f[],
\f[C]cache.negative_entry\f[]
.IP \[bu] 2
@ -1430,8 +1447,6 @@ enable \f[C]cache.readdir\f[]
.IP \[bu] 2
change the number of worker threads
.IP \[bu] 2
disable \f[C]security_capability\f[] and/or \f[C]xattr\f[]
.IP \[bu] 2
disable \f[C]posix_acl\f[]
.IP \[bu] 2
disable \f[C]async_read\f[]
@ -1439,11 +1454,11 @@ disable \f[C]async_read\f[]
test theoretical performance using \f[C]nullrw\f[] or mounting a ram
disk
.IP \[bu] 2
use \f[C]symlinkify\f[] if your data is largely static
use \f[C]symlinkify\f[] if your data is largely static and read\-only
.IP \[bu] 2
use tiered cache drives
.IP \[bu] 2
use lvm and lvm cache to place a SSD in front of your HDDs
use LVM and LVM cache to place a SSD in front of your HDDs
.PP
If you come across a setting that significantly impacts performance
please contact trapexit so he may investigate further.