Before this change rclone would emit the message
--checksum is in use but the source and destination have no hashes in common; falling back to --size-only
When the source or destination hash was missing as well as when the
source and destination had no hashes in common.
This first case is very confusing for users when the source and
destination do have a hash in common.
This change fixes that and makes sure the error message is not emitted
on missing hashes even when there is a hash in common.
See: https://forum.rclone.org/t/source-and-destination-have-no-hashes-in-common-for-unencrypted-drive-to-local-sync/19531
Before ths fix --cutoff-mode soft and cautious would emit a Fatal
error which stopped the sync immediately.
This fix introduces a new error which is checked in the sync error
processing which stops the sync gracefully.
Fixes#4576
- add a directory to the optional Purge interface
- fix up all the backends
- add an additional integration test to test for the feature
- use the new feature in operations.Purge
Many of the backends had been prepared in advance for this so the
change was trivial for them.
This is preparation for getting the Accounting to check the context,
buf first we need to get it in place. Since this is one of those
changes that makes lots of noise, this is in a seperate commit.
This adds expire and unlink fields to the PublicLink interface.
This fixes up the affected backends and removes unlink parameters
where they are present.
Before this change if you specified --hash MD5 in rclone lsf it would
calculate all the hashes and just return the MD5 hash which was very
slow on the local backend.
Likewise specifying --hash on rclone lsjson was equally slow.
This change introduces the --hash-type flag (and corresponding
internal parameter) so that the hashes required can be selected in
lsjson.
This is used internally in lsf when the --hash parameter is selected
to speed up the hashing by only hashing with the one hash specified.
Fixes#4181
Before this change if there were two files with the same name and the
same ID in the same directory, dedupe would delete one of them but
since these are actually the same file (with the same ID) then both
files would be deleted leading to data loss.
This should never actually happen, however it did happen as part of a
bug introduced in rclone which was fixed by
dfc7215bf9 drive: fix duplicate items when using --drive-shared-with-me #4018
This change checks to see if any of the duplicates have the same ID
and if they do it refuses to delete them.
Before this change backends which introduce overhead (eg crypt) were
failing to upload the first file.
This change increases the threshold to 2k to allow the first file to
go through even with some overhead but the next file to definitely
fail.
Before this change we checked the transfer was out of range only
before the Read call. This means that we returned all the data to the
reader before declaring an error. This means that some backends wrote
the file even though an error was returned.
This fix checks the transfer after the Read as well, and chops the
excess characters off the read data if we are over the limit so that
we don't ever deliver all the data.
This fixes the tests introduced as part of 6f1766dd9e and #2672
on backends other than local.
Before this change the exit code for transfer limit exceeded was
incorrect. This was because the `resolveExitCode` function unwraps the
error thus reading the underlying error which is not the same as the
error it was comparing to (`ErrorMaxTransferLimitReached`).
This change fixes it by splitting the error definition in two so that
when the Fatal error is unwrapped we match against
`ErrorMaxTransferLimitReached` however when we return the error we
return `ErrorMaxTransferLimitReachedFatal`.
In bde0334bd8 "operations: fix setting the timestamp on Windows
for multithread copy" the test for multithread copy failed to take
into account the modify window of the remote under test.
Before this fix we attempted to set the modification time on the file
when it was open. This works fine on Linux but not on Windows. The
test was also incorrect testing the source file rather than the
destination file.
This closes the file before setting the modification time and fixes
the tests.
Fixes#3994