- Change rclone/fs interfaces to accept context.Context
- Update interface implementations to use context.Context
- Change top level usage to propagate context to lover level functions
Context propagation is needed for stopping transfers and passing other
request-scoped values.
This makes WriteAt for non cached files wait a short time if it gets
an out of order write (which would normally cause an error) to see if
the gap will be filled with an in order write.
The makes the SFTP backend work fine with --vfs-cache-mode off
Before this change we locked the root directory, recursively fetched
the listing, applied it then unlocked the root directory.
After this change we recursively fetch the listing then apply it with
the root directory locked which shortens the time that the root
directory is locked greatly.
With the original method and the new method the subdirectories are
left unlocked and so potentially could be changed leading to
inconsistencies. This change makes the potential for inconsistencies
slightly worse by leaving the root directory unlocked at a gain of a
much more responsive system while runing vfs/refresh.
See: https://forum.rclone.org/t/rclone-rc-vfs-refresh-locking-directory-being-refreshed/9004
Before this change when doing Mkdir the VFS layer could add the new
item to an unread directory which caused confusion.
It could also do mkdir on a file when run on a bucket based remote
which would temporarily overwrite the file with a directory.
Fixes#2993
This fixes FreeBSD which seems to call SetAttr with a size even on
read only files.
This is probably a bug in the FreeBSD FUSE implementation as it
happens with mount and cmount.
See: https://forum.rclone.org/t/freebsd-question/8662/12
Previously to this change, backends without the optional interface
DirMove could not rename directories.
This change uses the new operations.DirMove call to implement renaming
directories which will fall back to Move/Copy as necessary.
Before this change, renaming and deleting of open files (which can
easily happen due to the asynchronous nature of file systems) would
produce an error, for example saving files with Firefox.
After this change we open files with the flags necessary for open
files to be renamed or deleted.
Fixes#2730
Before this change we took the locks file.mu and file.muRW in an
inconsistent order - after the change we always take them in the same
order to fix the deadlock.
Before this fix there were two paths where concurrent use of a
directory could take the file lock then directory lock and the other
would take the locks in the reverse order.
Fix this by narrowing the locking windows so the file lock and
directory lock don't overlap.
Reduce the number of nodes purged from the dir-cache when ForgetPath is
called. This is done by only forgetting the cache of the received path
and invalidating the parent folder cache by resetting *Dir.read.
The parent will read the listing on the next access and reuse the
dir-cache of entries in *Dir.items.
Before this change remotes without server side Move (eg swift, s3,
gcs) would not be able to rename files.
After it means nearly all remotes will be able to rename files on
rclone mount with the notable exceptions of b2 and yandex.
This changes checks to see if the remote can do Move or Copy then
calls `operations.Move` to do the actual move. This will do a server
side Move or Copy but won't download and re-upload the file.
It also checks to see if the destination exists first which avoids
conflicts or duplicates.
Fixes#1965Fixes#2569
vfs/refresh will walk the directory tree for the given paths and
freshen the directory cache. It will use the fast-list capability
of the remote when enabled.
This stops the cache cleaner running unnecessarily and saves
resources.
This also helps with issue #2227 which was caused by a second mount
deleting objects in the first mounts cache.
Without this fix the cached file can be removed as the file is being
uploaded or downloaded. This can cause the directory listings to
become inconsistent (this issue) or data loss (if a retry was needed
in the Copy).
Remove file needs to be excluded from running at the same time as both
openPending and close so it makes sense to unify the locking between
all 3.
This was caused by this sequence of calls
1> file.Release
1> file.close -> takes the file lock
2> vfs.waitforWriters
2> dir.walk -> takes the dir lock
1> file.setObject
1> dir.addObject -> attempts to take the dir lock - BLOCKS
2> file.activeWriters -> tries to take file lock - BLOCKS - DEADLOCK
The fix is to make activeWriters not take the file lock and use atomic
operations to read the number of writers instead.
