We're changing the implementation of trust levels to use groups. Part of this is to have site settings that reference trust levels use groups instead. It converts the min_trust_to_flag_posts site setting to flag_post_allowed_groups.
Note: In the original setting, "posts" is plural. I have changed this to "post" singular in the new setting to match others.
We're changing the implementation of trust levels to use groups. Part of this is to have site settings that reference trust levels use groups instead. It converts the min_trust_to_edit_post site setting to edit_post_allowed_groups.
The old implementation will co-exist for a short period while I update any references in plugins and themes.
This change converts the min_trust_to_create_topic site setting to
create_topic_allowed_groups.
See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/283408
- Hides the old setting
- Adds the new site setting
- Add a deprecation warning
- Updates to use the new setting
- Adds a migration to fill in the new setting if the old setting was
changed
- Adds an entry to the site_setting.keywords section
- Updates tests to account for the new change
- After a couple of months, we will remove the min_trust_to_create_topicsetting entirely.
Internal ref: /t/117248
This change converts the allow_uploaded_avatars site setting to uploaded_avatars_allowed_groups.
See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/283408
Hides the old setting
Adds the new site setting
Adds a deprecation warning
Updates to use the new setting
Adds a migration to fill in the new setting if the old setting was changed
Adds an entry to the site_setting.keywords section
Updates tests to account for the new change
After a couple of months, we will remove the allow_uploaded_avatars setting entirely.
Internal ref: /t/117248
Why this change?
The tags modal loads more tags via infinite loading based on when the last tag in the
given page appears in the viewport for the user. When it comes in to
view, a request is then triggered to fetch additional tags. To ensure
that we are only loading a single page of tags each time the modal is
opened, we previously set a max height on the modal's body to ensure
that the last tag which appears in the modal will be outside of the view
port in the initial load. However, this has regressed recently due to
unknown reasons and resulted in multiple pages of tags being loaded
immediately from the server as the modal's height was not restricted.
This regression was caught by an existing test but was unfortunately
determined as flaky.
What does this change do?
This change restores the max height on the edit navigation menu tags
modal on dekstop.
Why this change?
Asserting against records of the database in system tests can be flaky
because those assertions can run against the database before the server
has actually saved the necessary changes to the database.
What does this change do?
While the assertion is not ideal, we are working around this as a
temporary fix by using `try_until_success` which will retry the
assertion up till the default capybara timeout.
Followup to e37fb3042d
Some plugins like discourse-ai and discourse-saml do not
nicely change from kebab-case to Title Case (e.g. Ai, Saml),
and anyway this method of getting the plugin name is not
translated either.
Better to use the plugin setting category if it exists,
since that is written by a human and is translated.
This commit extracts the storage part of the route-scroll-manager into a dedicated service. This provides a key/value store which will reset for each navigation, and restore previous values when the user uses the back/forward buttons in their browser.
This gives us a reliable replacement for the old `DiscourseRoute.isPoppedState` function, which would not work under all situations.
Previously reverted in e6370decfd. This version has been significantly refactored, and includes an additional system spec for the issue we identified.
This change converts the `approve_unless_trust_level` site setting to
`approve_unless_allowed_groups`.
See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/283408
- Adds the new site setting
- Adds a deprecation warning
- Updates core to use the new settings.
- Adds a migration to fill in the new setting of the old setting was
changed
- Adds an entry to the site_setting.keywords section
- Updates many tests to account for the new change
After a couple of months we will remove the `approve_unless_trust_level`
setting entirely.
Internal ref: /t/115696
* Remove checkmark for official plugins
* Add author for plugin, which is By Discourse for all discourse
and discourse-org github plugins
* Link to meta topic instead of github repo
* Add experimental flag for plugin metadata and show this as a
badge on the plugin list if present
---------
Co-authored-by: chapoi <101828855+chapoi@users.noreply.github.com>
In the long term we should aim to modernize these places, but for now this change will make them compatible with Ember 5.x (while maintaining compatibility with Ember 3.28)
Why this change?
The test became flaky due to d208396c5c.
In that commit, we introduced `page.has_no_css?("div.menu-panel.animating")` to `PageObjects::Components::NavigationMenu::Sidebar#open_on_mobile` but
it did not work as intended because `page.has_no_css?("div.menu-panel.animating")` can return `true` immediately as the `animating` class has not been added
to the element.
What does this change do?
Switch to the `wait_for_animation` system helper to ensure that all
animations have ended on the element.
This PR refactors the following:
* leaving all the CSS applied to the old `modal-body` classes in their respective files
* made new clean styling for `.d-modal` and refactored the template to use the new BEM classes
* `inner-`, `middle-`, `outer-` container classes are gone and replaced with simplified `wrapper` and `container` classes
* use standardised max-sizes with modifiers `-large` and `-max`
* lighter backdrop,
* min-width to prevent puny modals
* other styling changes regarding padding, close button,…
* pulled out all modal overrides into a general `modal-overrides` file + cleanup of outdated CSS
* pulled out login and create account modal styling into their own file, cause it's such a big override
* removed old general login.scss file for mobile & desktop
* only kept some remainders I don't want to touch in `app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/login.scss`
The most common thing that we do with fab! is:
fab!(:thing) { Fabricate(:thing) }
This commit adds a shorthand for this which is just simply:
fab!(:thing)
i.e. If you omit the block, then, by default, you'll get a `Fabricate`d object using the fabricator of the same name.
This commit adds an /admin/customize/theme-components route,
that opens the theme page with the components tab pre-selected,
so people can navigate to that directly.
Switches to using a dialog to confirm a session (i.e. sudo mode for
account changes where we want to be extra sure the current user is who
they say they are) to match what we do with passkeys.
When submitting files through the form template upload field, we were having an issue where, although a validation error message was being presented to the user, the upload was still coming through, because `PickFilesButton`'s validation happens **after** the Uppy mixin finished the upload and hit `uploadDone`.
This PR adds a new overridable method to the Uppy mixin and overrides it with the custom validation, which now happens before the file is sent.
Additionally, we're now also using `uploadingOrProcessing` as the source of truth to show the upload/uploading label, which seems more reliable.
NOTE: Most of this is experimental and will be removed at a later
time, which is why things like translations have not been added.
The new /admin-revamp UI uses a sidebar for admin nav. This initial
step adds a script to generate a map of all the current admin nav
into a format the sidebar to read. Then, people can experiment
with different changes to this structure.
The structure can then be edited from `/admin-revamp/config/sidebar-experiment`,
and it is saved to local storage so people can visually experiment with different ways
of showing the admin sidebar links.
