Not when doing a site-wide search like we do in the Directory.
This solves the following specfailure:
1) DirectoryItemsController with data finds user by name
Failure/Error: expect(json['directory_items'].length).to eq(1)
expected: 1
got: 0
(compared using ==)
# ./spec/requests/directory_items_controller_spec.rb:88:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:271:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./bundle/ruby/2.7.0/gems/webmock-3.11.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:37:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
When doing a user search (eg. when mentioning a user) we will not prioritie
users who hasn't been seen in over a year.
REFACTOR the user-search specs to be more precise regarding the ordering
This cookie is only used during login. Having it persist after that can
cause some unusual behavior, especially for sites with short session
lengths.
We were already deleting the cookie following a new signup, but not for
existing users.
This commit moves the cookie deletion logic out of the erb template, and
adds logic and tests to ensure it is always deleted consistently.
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
A simplified version of the logic used in the function before my fix is as follow:
```ruby
result = []
things = [0,1,2,3]
max_values = 2
every = (things.size.to_f / max_values).ceil
things.each_with_index do |t, index|
next unless (t % every) === 0
result << t
end
p result # [0, 2]
# 3 doesn’t get included
```
The problem is that if you get unlucky two times you won't get last tuple(s) and might get a very erroneous date.
Double unlucky:
- last tuple index % computed every !== 0 and you don't get the last tuple
- the last tuple is related to a post with a very different date than the previous tuples (on year difference in our case)
Lots of changes but it's mostly a refactoring.
The interesting part that was fix are the 'load_problem_<model>_ids' methods.
They will now return records with no search data associated so they can be properly indexed for the search.
This "bad" state usually happens after a migration.
- Read in schemas from actual json files instead of a ruby hash. This is
helpful because we will be automatically generating .json schema files
from json responses and don't want to manually write ruby hash schema
files.
- Create a helper method for rspec schema validation tests to dry up code
* DEV: Add schema checking to api doc testing
This commit improves upon rswag which lacks schema checking. rswag
really only checks that the https status matches, but this change adds
in the json-schema_builder gem which also has schema validation.
Now we can define schemas for each of our requests/responses in the
`spec/requests/api/schemas` directory which will make our documentation
specs a lot cleaner.
If we update a serializer by either adding or removing an attribute the
tests will now fail (this is a good thing!). Also if you change the type
of an attribute say from an array to a string the tests will now fail.
This will help significantly with keeping the docs in sync with actual
code changes! Now if you change how an endpoint will respond you will
have to update the docs too in order for the tests to pass. :D
This PR is inspired by:
https://www.tealhq.com/post/how-teal-keeps-their-api-tests-and-documentation-in-sync
* Swap out json schema validator gem
Swapped out the outdated json-schema_builder gem with the json_schemer
gem.
* Add validation fields to schema
In order to have "strict" validation we need to add
`additionalProperties: false` to the schema, and we need to specify
which attributes are required.
Updated the debugging test output to print out the error details if
there are any.
The bug was mentioned on [meta](https://meta.discourse.org/t/two-bugs-with-usernames-starting-with-subfolder-name/169505)
When discourse is installed on `/subfolder` and username is containing subfolder name like for example `subfolderadmin` - user URLs were incorrect.
Instead of having `/subfolder/u/subfolderadmin/summary/` we were leading to `/subfolder/uadmin/summary`.
The reason for that was incorrect check in `getUrl` helper:
```javascript
const found = url.indexOf(baseUri);
if (found >= 0 && found < 3) {
return url;
}
return baseUri + url;
```
baseUri is `/subfolder`, url is `/u/subfolderadmin` and indexOf returned position which in the end returned incorrect URL.
I think that we should check if the URL starts with baseUri and not if contains baseUri.
