* DEV: Removal of create_post_for_category_and_tag_changes setting
reverting commit: #65f35e1
and adding a migration to remove the setting
ref: t/132320
* DEV: change checks for zeros to check for nils
* DEV: remove create_post_for_category_and_tag_changes migration file
If anything goes wrong, we can always revert back to the previous state.
When browsing through a sidebar with this feature enabled (i.e. admin, or docs), it's weird to have the scroll jump around when you click an item. This commit adds a check, so that we only `scrollIntoView` for items which are not already in the viewport.
Followup to b7cce1a0dc
We changed the design of the member access wizard step to use toggle groups instead of switches. To support existing designs for notices, we need another plugin outlet.
0 is falsy in JavaScript, so the original code would treat 0 as if it
were not input. This unique exception was added to prevent 0 from being
treated as empty input.
This commit fixes a bug in the redesigned about page where if there's no banner image configured for the page, the top of the page where the banner goes is occupied with large white space. Additionally, this commit also fixes a related bug in the admin config area for the /about page where it's not possible to remove the uploaded banner image.
This commit updates `Demon::Base#start` to call `Discourse.before_fork`
before forking. According to the docs in `mini_racer`, we need to
"Dispose manually of all MiniRacer::Context objects prior to forking".
This commit is motivated by a segmentation fault which we are seeing in
production when killing a daemon process. Backtrace of the core dump
includes traces of `mini_racer` so we think this is the cause. Note that
we are not 100% sure if this will fix the issue.
### Why?
Before, all flags were static. Therefore, they were stored in class variables and serialized by SiteSerializer. Recently, we added an option for admins to add their own flags or disable existing flags. Therefore, the class variable had to be dropped because it was unsafe for a multisite environment. However, it started causing performance problems.
### Solution
When a new Flag system is used, instead of using PostActionType, we can serialize Flags and use fragment cache for performance reasons.
At the same time, we are still supporting deprecated `replace_flags` API call. When it is used, we fall back to the old solution and the admin cannot add custom flags. In a couple of months, we will be able to drop that API function and clean that code properly. However, because it may still be used, redis cache was introduced to improve performance.
To test backward compatibility you can add this code to any plugin
```ruby
replace_flags do |flag_settings|
flag_settings.add(
4,
:inappropriate,
topic_type: true,
notify_type: true,
auto_action_type: true,
)
flag_settings.add(1001, :trolling, topic_type: true, notify_type: true, auto_action_type: true)
end
```
This commit seeks to reduce the memory footprint of `Chat::AutoRemove::HandleCategoryUpdated.call`
by optimizing the
`Chat::AutoRemove::HandleCategoryUpdated#remove_users_without_channel_permission` method which was
loading all the ActiveRecord users objects into memory at once. This
change updates the method call to load the ActiveRecord user objects in
batches instead.
`defaultCategoryLinkRenderer` is using a fake category object which doesn’t have access to the functions and getters of category model.
This had been incorrectly set in c197daa04c
As we don't get a real category object, we have to call the transformers manually and also pass the fake category object as context, this is not ideal as people might try to access properties in the transformer which are not available on the category object given they will be different based on the context. Hopefully one day this helper and all the chain can be refactored to use a real category model.
This commit also adds tests for these two properties in the category-link helper.
<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
When upgrading to Rails 7.1, we had some problems because we were using
several tagged loggers at the same time. They were all added to the main
broadcast logger shipped with Rails, but the Rails 7.1 codebase contains
a bug making a request being run as many times as there are tagged loggers.
The fix was to use the code from the Rails 7.2 codebase.
This patch adds a small spec to ensure the behavior will stay the proper
one in the future.
This commit forces the textarea to check if the list is inside a codefence and won't continue the list if it's the case.
Note this commit also uses the message param of qunit assertions to make them more explicit. It has no impact on behavior.
This change ensures native push notifications respect the site setting for push_notification_time_window_mins. Previously only web push notifications would account for the delay, now we can bring more consistency between Discourse in browser vs Hub, by applying the same delay strategy to both forms of push notifications.
See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/cant-edit-topic-with-poll-bug-occurs/320845?u=merefield
When the Poll is set to "results ON_CLOSE", vote numbers for each option are only streamed to the browser when the vote is Closed. It is therefore not possible to render the Results.
The current issue is that when you refresh the page, for those that have voted the default view is results. For this type of poll this should NOT happen. The Results view in this mode should not be possible to see until closure, even for the Author.
Because the votes are not yet serialised when this kind of poll remains open, an attempt to display results causes a JavaScript exception and in any case does not make logical sense.
So the fix here is making sure the default view, for Polls that have results on close, is the voting view until the Poll is Closed.
I've added a test to cover this scenario.
Additionally, this requires a refresh of the page when the poll admin actions a Close to ensure the results are serialized in.
Initially, the poll results display a maximum of 25 voters per option. If the number of voters exceeds this limit, a button allows users to load additional pages of voters.
When this button is clicked, a method is called to retrieve the additional voter information. However, there was a bug where the local tracked object was not properly updated for ranked choice voters. This is due to the existence of two attributes per option: one indicating whether new data is currently loading, and the other containing the list of voters.
Instead of updating the entire option key with the voters list, the fix requires updating the voters attribute only.
This is a small but critical change. The pull request also includes a new test that significantly increases coverage, addressing this issue and beyond.
### Why?
Before, all flags were static. Therefore, they were stored in class variables and serialized by SiteSerializer. Recently, we added an option for admins to add their own flags or disable existing flags. Therefore, the class variable had to be dropped because it was unsafe for a multisite environment. However, it started causing performance problems.
### Solution
When a new Flag system is used, instead of using PostActionType, we can serialize Flags and use fragment cache for performance reasons.
At the same time, we are still supporting deprecated `replace_flags` API call. When it is used, we fall back to the old solution and the admin cannot add custom flags. In a couple of months, we will be able to drop that API function and clean that code properly. However, because it may still be used, redis cache was introduced to improve performance.
To test backward compatibility you can add this code to any plugin
```ruby
replace_flags do |flag_settings|
flag_settings.add(
4,
:inappropriate,
topic_type: true,
notify_type: true,
auto_action_type: true,
)
flag_settings.add(1001, :trolling, topic_type: true, notify_type: true, auto_action_type: true)
end
```
Adds a new statistics (hidden from the UI, but available via the API) that tracks daily participating users.
A user is considered as "participating" if they have
- Reacted to a post
- Replied to a topic
- Created a new topic
- Created a new PM
- Sent a chat message
- Reacted to a chat message
Internal ref - t/131013
