The latest openapi spec version is v3.1.0
https://spec.openapis.org/oas/v3.1.0
Specifying the latest version will allow our openapi spec linter to use
this version and allow use to use the new type format that allows for
specifying a type as "null", which we need because sometimes our api
responses include null values instead of a "string", "integer", or
"object" type.
See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/48114322/588458
The invite acceptance page is an alternative signup flow, so it makes sense to include the new 'link' functionality there as well.
Followup to 7dc8f8b794
In 2018 check was added that TL1 welcome message is sent unless user already has BasicBadge granted.
I think we should also check if BasicBadge is even enabled. Otherwise, each time group is assigned to a user and trust level is recalculated, they will receive a welcome message.
We've recently added a limit to the posts history modal so it displays the last 100 revisions only for performance reasons. However, the title of the modal now always says `History, last 100 revisions` even when the post has fewer than 100 revisions which can be a bit noisy.
This PR amends the history modal so the title of the modal says `History` when the post's revisions count is ≤100, and `History, last 100 revisions` when it has more >100 revisions.
When a user signs up via an external auth method, a new link is added to the signup modal which allows them to connect an existing Discourse account. This will only happen if:
- There is at least 1 other auth method available
and
- The current auth method permits users to disconnect/reconnect their accounts themselves
This handles a few edge cases which are extremely rare (due to the UI layout), but still technically possible:
- Ensure users are authenticated before attempting association.
- Add a message and logic for when a user already has an association for a given auth provider.
The following example message would generate an exception:
```
Return-Path: <discourse@bar.com>
From: Foo Bar <discourse@bar.com>
To: reply+4f97315cc828096c9cb34c6f1a0d6fe8@bar.com
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:12:43 +0100
Message-ID: <21@foo.bar.mail>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
</div>
```
Exception:
```
NoMethodError:
undefined method `split' for nil:NilClass
```
- active setting should now correctly show an arrow which was previously floating in the middle of nowhere
- uses a correct color for border separation, previously the border was present but invisible as similar to the background
- slighty tweak padding
- makes arrow computation based on a variable
We weren't calling clear_all! for the rate limiter which
was the first problem, and the second problem was that it
is very odd to do state cleanup before tests instead of after,
so moved the disabling and clear_all! to after.
When no element is selected, on the homepage for example, pressing `s` would generate the following error:
```
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'click' of undefined
```
Note that this commit also removes jquery usage.
This reverts a part of changes introduced by https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/13947
In that PR I:
1. Disallowed topic feature links for TL-0 users
2. Additionally, disallowed just putting any URL in topic titles for TL-0 users
Actually, we don't need the second part. It introduced unnecessary complexity for no good reason. In fact, it tries to do the job that anti-spam plugins (like Akismet plugin) should be doing.
This PR reverts this second change.
This will fix the try-reset build that failed today. Probably this going to happen again with other tables that have constraints on date columns. I'm going to modify the script to make it work without ignoring such tables. After that, the only table we're going to need to ignore will be the 2FA table.
Before I fixed that, don't hesitate to tag me if the try-reset build fail again.
Plugins listening on the `before_auth` callback can interact with the request object and access data like the user agent or the remote IP address. We'll later store this data in the user record, but it might not exist at this point if we're authenticating a new account.
