This backend is a bit faster and well tested, this is part of a longer
term plan to have a `backend: :memory, threaded: false` type config for
message bus which we can use in test.
The threading in message bus causes all sorts of surprises in test, it will
be nice not to be beholden to them.
Previously we relied on fabrication on anonymous, we can not get the
transaction commit pipeline to work as it does in production, cleanly
This amends it so our anonymous user is created using the core APIs
Signed-off-by: Sam Saffron <sam.saffron@gmail.com>
Previously we used custom fields to denote a user was anonymous, this was
risky in that custom fields are prone to race conditions and are not
properly dedicated, missing constraints and so on.
The new table `anonymous_users` is properly protected. There is only one
possible shadow account per user, which is enforced using a constraint.
Every anonymous user will have a unique row in the new table.
The problem here is that hour and minute were passed to the %{duration} variable which made them impossible to translate in other languages.
I wonder if it's worth having 2 almost identical translations just for "reached" and "exceeded"? Perhaps we could combine them in one copy?
SSO uses a special param to username suggester that whitelists a username
due to previous work we amended our lookup logic and started ignoring this
whitelist.
The fix ensures we always respect it, and also improves on the original
implementation that forgot to normalize the username.
Adds `DISCOURSE_MESSAGE_BUS_REDIS_ENABLED` env var, that when set
to true, will allow Discourse to connect to a different redis
instance for MessageBus needs.
When enabled you can configure the same env vars user for redis,
but prefixed by `MESSAGE_BUS`, eg:
`DISCOURSE_MESSAGE_BUS_REDIS_HOST`
This also corrects FileHelper.download so it supports "follow_redirect"
correctly (it used to always follow 1 redirect) and adds a `validate_url`
param that will bypass all uri validation if set to false (default is true)
The `AutoQueueHandler` will ignore really old flags. In that case, don't
notify the user that the moderator is looking into it. They probably
never saw it because it didn't meet the reviewable minimum priority.
