Previously we would store every FakeRequest object for all tests, resulting in many hundreds/thousands of objects in the `handledRequests` array.
This commit ensures all pretender state is reset between tests.
- There's no need to pass `filter` to `user-notifications-large`. The component doesn't use it.
- Rename css class to avoid confusion (this div has nothing to-do with the Select Kit)
- Remove duplicated declarations in test fixtures
This is `console.log`'d to the browser console. run-qunit will print this to stdout. testem will not, so a custom reporter is implemented to print this message.
The `--enable-precise-memory-info` is added so that chrome provides high-resolution memory information. This API is not supported by firefox. The logic will degrade gracefully.
Note this commit is also adding support for teardown in pre-initializers just like we have for initializers.
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
We were using multiple methods to check which environment we're running in. This commit switches us to use the isLegacyEmber helper consistently. This should be a no-op, but makes the code much easier to read
Under Ember CLI, we create a new application instance for each test. We were not correctly destroying it after the test, causing many references to be maintaned (e.g. at the end of a test run, `Ember.Namespace.NAMESPACES` would have an entry for each application instance).
Calling `destroy` on the application instance tidies up these references, and is one step towards fixing our test memory leak problem. Unfortunately there still seem to be other references being held to the application, so this commit is not a total fix.
The all inboxes was introduced in
016efeadf6 but we decided to roll it back
for performance reasons. The main performance challenge here is that PG
has to basically loop through all the PMs that a user is allowed to view
before being able to order by `Topic#bumped_at`. The all inboxes was not
planned as part of the new/unread filter so we've decided not to tackle
the performance issue for the upcoming release.
Follow-up to 016efeadf6
As sharing has some hover behavior, it was looking slightly clunky with fast edit changing position. Putting sharing at the last position will reduce this effect.
When the loading spinner is removed (e.g. via the loading-slider component), the subcategory list view will persist, even when no longer required. This is because we were conditionally rendering the list into the `header-list-container` outlet. When the condition was false, we were doing nothing. Instead, we should use `disconectOutlet` to make sure the content is removed from the DOM.
Firefox does not return a PerformanceMeasure object when using
performance.mark and performance.measure, even though MDN says it
should https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Performance/measure#return_value
So for now, we disable the upload instrumentation with a test
to see if a PerformanceMeasure (or anything really) is returned.
When creating a reply after already navigating out of the
topic (e.g. open the reply composer, go to a different topic,
then create the post), the _removeDeleteOnOwnerReplyBookmarks
function was erroring because it relied on the topic model
being present.
We can skip this function altogether if the topic model is _not_
present, because the PostCreator already takes care of deleting
bookmarks with the on_owner_reply auto_delete_preference. The
_removeDeleteOnOwnerReplyBookmarks function just cleans up the
in-memory post stream and topic model.
This commit allows for measuring the time taken for
individual uploads via the new uppy interfaces, only
if the enable_upload_debug_mode site setting is enabled.
Also in this PR, for upload errors with a specific message
locally, we return the real message to show in the modal
instead of the upload.failed message so the developer
does not have to dig around in logs.
The file size error messages for max_image_size_kb and
max_attachment_size_kb are shown to the user in the KB
format, regardless of how large the limit is. Since we
are going to support uploading much larger files soon,
this KB-based limit soon becomes unfriendly to the end
user.
For example, if the max attachment size is set to 512000
KB, this is what the user sees:
> Sorry, the file you are trying to upload is too big (maximum
size is 512000KB)
This makes the user do math. In almost all file explorers that
a regular user would be familiar width, the file size is shown
in a format based on the maximum increment (e.g. KB, MB, GB).
This commit changes the behaviour to output a humanized file size
instead of the raw KB. For the above example, it would now say:
> Sorry, the file you are trying to upload is too big (maximum
size is 512 MB)
This humanization also handles decimals, e.g. 1536KB = 1.5 MB
This commit also hides a number of options which are not used during Discourse development.
Change have been tested on both the legacy `/qunit` route, and the Ember CLI `/tests` route.
This adds support for `qunit_skip_core`, `qunit_skip_plugins` and `qunit_single_plugin` parameters on the Ember CLI `/tests` route using the `addModuleExcludeMatcher` API. Legacy support is maintained for the `/qunit` route.
".search-menu" matches the parent element of the element that was
previously selected. This is a better choice because it offers some
flexibility over the DOM structure without breaking the keyboard
shortcuts.
Instead of going to the OP of the topic for topic-level bookmarks
(which are bookmarks where for_topic is true) when clicking on the
bookmark in the quick access menu or on the user bookmark list,
this commit takes the user to the last unread post in
the topic instead. This should be generally more useful than landing
on the unchanging OP.
To make this work nicely, I needed to add the last_read_post_number to
the BookmarkQuery based on the TopicUser association. It should not add
too much extra weight to the query, because it is limited to the user
that we are fetching bookmarks for.
Also fixed an issue where the bookmark serializer highest_post_number was
not taking into account whether the user was staff, which is when we
should use highest_staff_post_number instead.
