Calling pluck is instantly making a SELECT, while passing the relationship allows rails to build a correct query.
Before (2 selects):
```
pry(main)> Post.where(topic_id: Topic.where(id: [1,3,4]).pluck(:id)).count
(1.3ms) SELECT "topics"."id" FROM "topics" WHERE "topics"."deleted_at" IS NULL AND "topics"."id" IN (1, 3, 4)
Post Count (0.5ms) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "posts" WHERE "posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL AND "posts"."topic_id" IN (1, 3, 4)
```
After (1 select):
```
pry(main)> Post.where(topic_id: Topic.where(id: [1,3,4])).count
Post Count (2.7ms) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "posts" WHERE "posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL AND "posts"."topic_id" IN (SELECT "topics"."id" FROM "topics" WHERE "topics"."deleted_at" IS NULL AND "topics"."id" IN (1, 3, 4))
```
This removes the modal container named-outlet/controller/template and replaces it with a component. Named outlets will be removed in Ember 4.x, so this change is part of that upgrade project.
Smaller changes include:
- update some of the computed values to be getters rather than calculated during `show()`.
- update tests which were previously depending on the modal class persisting after the modal was closed
Much of the logic in the service will be deprecated once we introduce component-based modals.
This work is split out from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/21304
Previously merged in 80b77b2e and then reverted due to issues with the PM invite modal. This PR fixes the issue, and introduces a test which would have caught the issue.
Previously, there was an issue where closing the message actions menu on mobile would unintentionally trigger a click event on an element below it, such as a thread indicator or a reaction. With the recent fix, this problem has been resolved. Now, when you close the menu, it will no longer interfere with or activate any elements positioned underneath it.
Why is this change required?
Right now, we're awaiting on the promise returned by
`this.pmTopicTrackingState.startTracking()` which blocks the rendering
of the template until the promise resolves. However, this blocking of
the rendering ends up introducing yet another intermediate loading state
in the UI which we find unsightly. Instead of blocking the rendering, we
allow the promise to resolve in the background and display the
new/unread counts when the promise resolves.
What this change?
We are currently not fully satisfied with the current way to edit the
categories and tags that appears in the sidebar where the user is
redirected to the tracking preferences tab in the user's profile causing
the user to lose context of the current page. In addition, the dropdown
to select categories or tags limits the amount of information we can
display.
Since editing or adding a custom categories section is already using a
modal, we have decided to switch editing the categories and tags that
appear in the sidebar to use a modal as well.
This commit ships a first pass of the edit categories modal such that we
can keep the commit small and reviewable. The incomplete nature of the
feature is also reflected in the fact that the feature is hidden behind
a new `new_edit_sidebar_categories_tags_interface_groups` site setting.
One user can create a post or chat message with a hashtag they
have permission to use, but then when other users look at that
post they will see an empty space next to the hashtag because they
do not have the permission to load the colors in CSS classes for
the related category.
This fixes the issue by adding a default color with a special
CSS class if the user doesn't have permission to see the linked
channel/category on the hashtag.
Display modal for combined new and unread view with options:
- [x] Dismiss new topics
- [x] Dismiss new posts
- [ ] Stop tracking these topics so they stop appearing in my new list
Previously, the topic is pinned/unpinned even when the bookmark icon is pressed in the topic list page. Because we didn't check the class names of topic status icons.
What is this change required?
The `enable_offline_indicator` site setting is disabled by default so
there is no need for us to be rendering an extra Ember component when
the site setting is not enabled.
Why this change?
Before this change, the `GroupNotificationsButton` is rendered in the
template of `userPrivateMessages` route based on a conditional that
checks if the `isGroup` property is true. However, the `isGroup`
property is determined based on the child route that is rendered.
However, this leads to "jankiness" in the UI because the
`GroupNotificationsButton` will be rendered once the route is entered
even if the model for the child route has not been resolved yet.
What is the solution?
In order to avoid this, we move the rendering of the
`GroupNotificationsButton` into the template of the
`userPrivateMessages.group` route and rely on the `in-element` helper to
render it into the right spot in the template of the
`userPrivateMessages` route.
This removes the modal container named-outlet/controller/template and replaces it with a component. Named outlets will be removed in Ember 4.x, so this change is part of that upgrade project.
Smaller changes include:
- update some of the computed values to be getters rather than calculated during `show()`.
- update tests which were previously depending on the modal class persisting after the modal was closed
Much of the logic in the service will be deprecated once we introduce component-based modals.
This work is split out from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/21304
What is this change required?
We were seeing this error on CI
```
1) Fast edit when editing text that has strange characters saves when paragraph contains apostrophe
Failure/Error:
expect(find("#{topic_page.post_by_number_selector(2)} .cooked p")).to have_content(
"It ‘twas a great’ “day”!",
)
Selenium::WebDriver::Error::StaleElementReferenceError:
stale element reference: stale element not found
(Session info: chrome=114.0.5735.90)
```
I believe this is because the element that is "found" using `find` is
eventually re-rendered before the `have_content` matcher is called on
it.
AWS recommends running buckets without ACLs, and to use resource policies to manage access control instead.
This is not a bad idea, because S3 ACLs are whack, and while resource policies are also whack, they're a more constrained form of whack.
Further, some compliance regimes get antsy if you don't go with the vendor's recommended settings, and arguing that you need to enable ACLs on a bucket just to store images in there is more hassle than it's worth.
The new site setting (s3_use_acls) cannot be disabled when secure
uploads is enabled -- the latter relies on private ACLs for security
at this point in time. We may want to reexamine this in future.
Why does this change do?
This commit updates the educate message displayed when there are no new
topics on the `/new` route when the experimental new new view site setting is enabled.
The commit also fixes a couple of bugs:
1. Correct default auto track minutes used in the copy for unread
topics from the 4 minutes to 5 minutes.
2. Correct link to user's preference in copy to go to tracking tab
instead of notifications tab.
Failure message on CI
```
Failures:
1) Network Disconnected Doesn't show the offline indicator when the site setting isn't present
Failure/Error: expect(page).to have_css("html.message-bus-offline")
expected to find css "html.message-bus-offline" but there were no matches
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_network_disconnected_doesn_t_show_the_offline_indicator_when_the_site_setting_isn_t_present_764.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
http://localhost:31338/uploads/default/test_0/optimized/1X/_129430568242d1b7f853bb13ebea28b3f6af4e7_2_512x512.png - Failed to load resource: net::ERR_INTERNET_DISCONNECTED
http://localhost:31338/categories - Error while trying to use the following icon from the Manifest: http://localhost:31338/uploads/default/test_0/optimized/1X/_129430568242d1b7f853bb13ebea28b3f6af4e7_2_512x512.png (Download error or resource isn't a valid image)
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
# ./spec/system/network_disconnected_spec.rb:35:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
# ./spec/system/network_disconnected_spec.rb:8:in `with_network_disconnected'
# ./spec/system/network_disconnected_spec.rb:34:in `block (2 levels) in <main>'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:380:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:380:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:372:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/timeout-0.3.2/lib/timeout.rb:189:in `block in timeout'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/timeout-0.3.2/lib/timeout.rb:196:in `timeout'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:367:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:356:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/webmock-3.18.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:37:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
Not all revisions involve changes to the actual post/topic content. We
may want to know if a revisions includes the topic title or post raw.
Specifically introducing these for use in the Akismet plugin to
conditionally queue checks.
What is the problem?
The user messages routes are currently routed by the server to
`UserActionsController#private_messages`. However, the method is
essentially a no-op and does not do any preloading. As a result, when we
load the user private messages routes, the client ends up having to
issue another request to the server to get more information about the
user profile currently being viewed. This extra request is triggered by
the `user` model's `findDetails` method that is called from the `user`
route in the `afterModel` hook.
What is the solution?
The `user` model's `findDetails` method actually checks the preload
store to see if the `user_${username}` key is present in the store and
if it is, it will use the preloaded data instead of triggering another
request. Since the user private messages routes are nested under the
user route on the client side, we have to rely on the
`UsersController#show` controller action on the server side for the user private
messages route as the `UsersController#show` controller action preloads
the required user information for the client side.
Before, the review button was shown in `primary section` when there were items to review. Otherwise, it was hidden in `more section`.
Because we are allowing admins to customize community section and reorder link, it makes sense to simplify that logic and review link should follow admin's decision.
What is the problem?
When opening the composer, we are seeing multiple requests made to
the `/composer_messages` endpoint. This is due to our use of the
`transitionend` event on the `#reply-control` element. The event is
fired once for each transition event and the `#reply-control` element
has multiple transition events.
What is the solution?
Since are only interested in the `height` transition event, we add a
condition to check that the callback function is only triggered when the
`propertyName` of the `transitionend` event is `height`.
Why is there no tests for this change?
In QUnit, we have `transition: none !important` set in the stylesheet
with no easy way to disable. We'll have to accept the risk of not
writing test for this performance fix.
What does this change do?
Suggested topics by default are ordered in the following way:
1. Unread topics in current category of topic that is being viewed
2. Unread topics in other categories
3. New topics in current category of topics that is being viewed
4. New topics in other categories
5. Random topics
With the experimental new new view, we want to remove the concept of
read and new so that new order is as such:
1. Topics created by the current user with posts that the user has not
read ordered by topic's bumped date
2. Topics in current category of topic with posts that the user has not
read ordered by topic's bumped date
3. Topics in other categories with posts that the user has not read
ordered by topic's bumped date
4. Random topics ordered by topic's bumped date
