Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
41f8bff2c3
DEV: Remove superfluous js: true metadata (#21960)
Why this change?

It is very unlikely that we need to ever JS for system tests considering
that we rely on a JS framework on the frontend.
2023-06-07 09:26:58 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
876734bcb6
DEV: Partially revert d1924c7328 (#21895)
Just remove the assertions for now as they are a constant source of
tests flakiness.
2023-06-02 06:35:42 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
d1924c7328
DEV: Update checks in chat channel and thread page objects (#21889)
What is the problem?

We were calling out to methods that calls `has_css?` or `has_selector?`
which returns a boolean. Since we are not using the return value, it
means the methods can be deemed unnecessary. However, we do want those
checks and this commit adds the necessarily assertions to make use of
the return values.
2023-06-01 22:31:01 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
30e4ebd19b
Revert "DEV: Update checks in chat channel and thread page objects (#21875)" (#21883)
This reverts commit ddf4ecba04.

Causing a flaky test to appear:

```
main $ LOAD_PLUGINS=1 rspec plugins/chat/spec/system/chat/composer/shortcuts/channel_spec.rb

Randomized with seed 17765
.....F..

Failures:

  1) Chat | composer | shortcuts | channel when using ArrowUp when last message is staged does not edit a message
     Failure/Error: channel_page.send_message
       expected `#<PageObjects::Components::Chat::Messages:0x00007fe823ac1710 @context=".chat-channel">.has_message?({:persisted=>true, :text=>"2"})` to be truthy, got false

     [Screenshot Image]: /home/tgxworld/work/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_chat_composer_shortcuts_channel_when_using_arrow_up_when_last_message_is_staged_does_not_edit_a_message_148.png
```
2023-06-01 16:59:03 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
ddf4ecba04
DEV: Update checks in chat channel and thread page objects (#21875)
What is the problem?

We were calling out to methods that calls `has_css?` or `has_selector?`
which returns a boolean. Since we are not using the return value, it
means the methods can be deemed unnecessary. However, we do want those
checks and this commit adds the necessarily assertions to make use of
the return values.
2023-06-01 15:25:11 +08:00
Joffrey JAFFEUX
731282c2ec
FIX: attempts to make cooking less order dependent (#21253)
It's very hard to repro but under specific circumstances I suspect it was possible for this sequence to happen:

- set message TEXT
- cooking starts
- set message COOKED through another mean (like a message bus)
- the cooking started sooner finished and erases the cooked set at the step before causing the message to have the incorrect cooked
2023-04-26 16:50:38 +02:00
Joffrey JAFFEUX
274820d247
FIX: prevents exception when publishing processed (#21104)
This regression happened in bd5c5c4b5f and is due to `message_bus_targets = calculate_publish_targets(chat_channel, chat_message)` expecting a `chat_channel` which was only defined after.

Example exception in logs:

```
Job exception: undefined local variable or method `chat_channel' for Chat::Publisher:Module

/var/www/discourse/plugins/chat/app/services/chat/publisher.rb:91:in `publish_processed!' 
/var/www/discourse/plugins/chat/app/jobs/regular/chat/process_message.rb:21:in `block in execute' 
/var/www/discourse/lib/distributed_mutex.rb:53:in `block in synchronize' 
/var/www/discourse/lib/distributed_mutex.rb:49:in `synchronize' 
/var/www/discourse/lib/distributed_mutex.rb:49:in `synchronize' 
/var/www/discourse/lib/distributed_mutex.rb:34:in `synchronize' 
/var/www/discourse/plugins/chat/app/jobs/regular/chat/process_message.rb:7:in `execute' 
/var/www/discourse/app/jobs/base.rb:249:in `block (2 levels) in perform' 
```

This commit also:
- adds a spec to ensure oneboxing is not regressing anymore
- increment the version on message processed to ensure callbacks are correctly ran

Note we should also have more tests in `Chat::Publisher`, this will be done when we move it to a proper service.

<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
2023-04-16 10:30:33 +02:00