This confirmed that a file existed via access(file, F_OK).
But we already *know* that it does because this is the expansion for
the "trailing slash" - by definition all wildcard components up to
here have already been checked.
And it's not checking for directoryness either because it does F_OK.
This will remove one `access()` per result, which will cut the number
of syscalls needed for a glob that ends in a "/" in half.
This brings us on-par with e.g. `ls` (which uses statx while we use
newfstatat, but that should have about the same results)
Fixes#9891.
Remove the following C++ functions/methods, which have no callers:
fallback.cpp:
- wcstod_l
proc.cpp:
- job_t::get_processes
wutil.cpp:
- fish_wcstoll
- fish_wcstoull
Also drop unused configure checks/defines:
- HAVE_WCSTOD_L
- HAVE_USELOCALE
Remove the following C++ functions/methods, which have all been ported to Rust and no longer have any callers in C++:
common.cpp:
- assert_is_locked/ASSERT_IS_LOCKED
path.cpp:
- path_make_canonical
wutil.cpp:
- wreadlink
- fish_iswgraph
- file_id_t::older_than
It's super easy to get a lot of these and they'll otherwise slow down
the completions a lot.
This makes `git add <TAB>` ~5-6x faster with about 4000 untracked
files (a copy of the fish build directory). It goes from 1.5 seconds to
250ms.
This is just for the git >= 2.11 path, but the other one would require
more checking and since git 2.11 is almost 7 years old now that's not
worth it.
This makes `fish -c begin` fail with a status of 127 - it already
printed a syntax error so that was weird. (127 was the status for
syntax errors when piping to fish, so we stay consistent with that)
We allow multiple `-c` commands, and this will return the regular
status if the last `-c` succeeded.
This is fundamentally an extremely weird situation but this is the
simple targeted fix - we did nothing, unsuccessfully, so we should
fail.
Things to consider in future:
1. Return something better than 127 - that's the status for "unknown
command"!
2. Fail after a `-c` failed, potentially even checking all of them
before executing the first?
Fixes#9888
This also allows scoped feature tests that makes testing feature flags thread-safe.
As in you can guarantee that the test actually has the correct feature flag
value, regardless of which other tests are running in parallell.
This also cleans up and removes unnecessary usage of FFI-oriented `feature_metadata_t`,
which is only used from Rust code after `builtins/status` was ported.
This ran two `test`s a `count` and one `echo`, which is a bit wasteful.
So instead, for the common case where you pass one argument, this will
run one `set -q`.
This can save off ~160 microseconds for each ordinary `cd`, which
speeds it up by a factor of ~2 (so 1000 runs of cd might take 260ms
instead of 550ms).
Ideally the cd function would just be incorporated into the builtin,
but that's a bigger change.
Note this is slightly incomplete - the FD is not moved into the parser, and so
will be freed at the end of each directory change. The FD saved in the parser is
never actually used in existing code, so this doesn't break anything, but will
need to be corrected once the parser is ported.
This shaves about 9 seconds off of the runtime, and makes the test
deterministic.
We do not touch the test_convert test because there is a known failure and we
need to track it down before making it deterministic.
Get some stuff out of the common module, which is growing large.
Also migrate the tests into "native" Rust tests so they will run in parallel.
We have to use an explicit setlocale() call to get a multibyte locale, for the
"crazy" tests.
Prior to this commit, FLOG used the ffi bridge to get the output fd. Invert
this: have fish set the output fd within main. This allows FLOG to be used in
pure Rust tests.
After accidentally running a command that includes a pasted password, I want
to delete command from history. Today we need to recall or type (part of)
that command and type "history delete". Let's maybe add a shortcut to do
this from the history pager.
The current shortcut is Shift+Delete. I don't think that's very discoverable,
maybe we should use Delete instead (but only if the cursor is at the end of
the commandline, otherwise delete a char).
Closes#9454
