* Update go-redis to v8.4.0 * github.com/go-redis/redis/v8 v8.4.0 -> v8.5.0 * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> * TODO * Use the Queue termination channel as the default context for pushes Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * missed one Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
11 KiB
Vendored
Contributing to opentelemetry-go
The Go special interest group (SIG) meets regularly. See the
OpenTelemetry
community
repo for information on this and other language SIGs.
See the public meeting
notes
for a summary description of past meetings. To request edit access,
join the meeting or get in touch on
Gitter.
Development
You can view and edit the source code by cloning this repository:
git clone https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go.git
Run make test
to run the tests instead of go test
.
There are some generated files checked into the repo. To make sure
that the generated files are up-to-date, run make
(or make precommit
- the precommit
target is the default).
The precommit
target also fixes the formatting of the code and
checks the status of the go module files.
If after running make precommit
the output of git status
contains
nothing to commit, working tree clean
then it means that everything
is up-to-date and properly formatted.
Pull Requests
How to Send Pull Requests
Everyone is welcome to contribute code to opentelemetry-go
via
GitHub pull requests (PRs).
To create a new PR, fork the project in GitHub and clone the upstream
repo:
$ go get -d go.opentelemetry.io/otel
(This may print some warning about "build constraints exclude all Go
files", just ignore it.)
This will put the project in ${GOPATH}/src/go.opentelemetry.io/otel
. You
can alternatively use git
directly with:
$ git clone https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go
(Note that git clone
is not using the go.opentelemetry.io/otel
name -
that name is a kind of a redirector to GitHub that go get
can
understand, but git
does not.)
This would put the project in the opentelemetry-go
directory in
current working directory.
Enter the newly created directory and add your fork as a new remote:
$ git remote add <YOUR_FORK> git@github.com:<YOUR_GITHUB_USERNAME>/opentelemetry-go
Check out a new branch, make modifications, run linters and tests, update
CHANGELOG.md
, and push the branch to your fork:
$ git checkout -b <YOUR_BRANCH_NAME>
# edit files
# update changelog
$ make precommit
$ git add -p
$ git commit
$ git push <YOUR_FORK> <YOUR_BRANCH_NAME>
Open a pull request against the main opentelemetry-go
repo. Be sure to add the pull
request ID to the entry you added to CHANGELOG.md
.
How to Receive Comments
- If the PR is not ready for review, please put
[WIP]
in the title,
tag it aswork-in-progress
, or mark it as
draft
. - Make sure CLA is signed and CI is clear.
How to Get PRs Merged
A PR is considered to be ready to merge when:
- It has received two approvals from Collaborators/Maintainers (at
different companies). This is not enforced through technical means
and a PR may be ready to merge with a single approval if the change
and its approach have been discussed and consensus reached. - Major feedbacks are resolved.
- It has been open for review for at least one working day. This gives
people reasonable time to review. - Trivial changes (typo, cosmetic, doc, etc.) do not have to wait for
one day and may be merged with a single Maintainer's approval. CHANGELOG.md
has been updated to reflect what has been
added, changed, removed, or fixed.- Urgent fix can take exception as long as it has been actively
communicated.
Any Maintainer can merge the PR once it is ready to merge.
Design Choices
As with other OpenTelemetry clients, opentelemetry-go follows the
opentelemetry-specification.
It's especially valuable to read through the library
guidelines.
Focus on Capabilities, Not Structure Compliance
OpenTelemetry is an evolving specification, one where the desires and
use cases are clear, but the method to satisfy those uses cases are
not.
As such, Contributions should provide functionality and behavior that
conforms to the specification, but the interface and structure is
flexible.
It is preferable to have contributions follow the idioms of the
language rather than conform to specific API names or argument
patterns in the spec.
For a deeper discussion, see:
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/issues/165
Style Guide
One of the primary goals of this project is that it is actually used by
developers. With this goal in mind the project strives to build
user-friendly and idiomatic Go code adhering to the Go community's best
practices.
For a non-comprehensive but foundational overview of these best practices
the Effective Go documentation
is an excellent starting place.
As a convenience for developers building this project the make precommit
will format, lint, validate, and in some cases fix the changes you plan to
submit. This check will need to pass for your changes to be able to be
merged.
In addition to idiomatic Go, the project has adopted certain standards for
implementations of common patterns. These standards should be followed as a
default, and if they are not followed documentation needs to be included as
to the reasons why.
Configuration
When creating an instantiation function for a complex struct
it is useful
to allow variable number of options to be applied. However, the strong type
system of Go restricts the function design options. There are a few ways to
solve this problem, but we have landed on the following design.
config
Configuration should be held in a struct
named config
, or prefixed with
specific type name this Configuration applies to if there are multiple
config
in the package. This struct
must contain configuration options.
// config contains configuration options for a thing.
type config struct {
// options ...
}
In general the config
struct
will not need to be used externally to the
package and should be unexported. If, however, it is expected that the user
will likely want to build custom options for the configuration, the config
should be exported. Please, include in the documentation for the config
how the user can extend the configuration.
It is important that config
are not shared across package boundaries.
Meaning a config
from one package should not be directly used by another.
Optionally, it is common to include a newConfig
function (with the same
naming scheme). This function wraps any defaults setting and looping over
all options to create a configured config
.
// newConfig returns an appropriately configured config.
func newConfig([]Option) config {
// Set default values for config.
config := config{/* […] */}
for _, option := range options {
option.Apply(&config)
}
// Preform any validation here.
return config
}
If validation of the config
options is also preformed this can return an
error as well that is expected to be handled by the instantiation function
or propagated to the user.
Given the design goal of not having the user need to work with the config
,
the newConfig
function should also be unexported.
Option
To set the value of the options a config
contains, a corresponding
Option
interface type should be used.
type Option interface {
Apply(*config)
}
The name of the interface should be prefixed in the same way the
corresponding config
is (if at all).
Options
All user configurable options for a config
must have a related unexported
implementation of the Option
interface and an exported configuration
function that wraps this implementation.
The wrapping function name should be prefixed with With*
(or in the
special case of a boolean options Without*
) and should have the following
function signature.
func With*(…) Option { … }
bool
Options
type defaultFalseOption bool
func (o defaultFalseOption) Apply(c *config) {
c.Bool = bool(o)
}
// WithOption sets a T* to have an option included.
func WithOption() Option {
return defaultFalseOption(true)
}
type defaultTrueOption bool
func (o defaultTrueOption) Apply(c *config) {
c.Bool = bool(o)
}
// WithoutOption sets a T* to have Bool option excluded.
func WithoutOption() Option {
return defaultTrueOption(false)
}
Declared Type Options
type myTypeOption struct {
MyType MyType
}
func (o myTypeOption) Apply(c *config) {
c.MyType = o.MyType
}
// WithMyType sets T* to have include MyType.
func WithMyType(t MyType) Option {
return myTypeOption{t}
}
Instantiation
Using this configuration pattern to configure instantiation with a New*
function.
func NewT*(options ...Option) T* {…}
Any required parameters can be declared before the variadic options
.
Dealing with Overlap
Sometimes there are multiple complex struct
that share common
configuration and also have distinct configuration. To avoid repeated
portions of config
s, a common config
can be used with the union of
options being handled with the Option
interface.
For example.
// config holds options for all animals.
type config struct {
Weight float64
Color string
MaxAltitude float64
}
// DogOption apply Dog specific options.
type DogOption interface {
ApplyDog(*config)
}
// BirdOption apply Bird specific options.
type BirdOption interface {
ApplyBird(*config)
}
// Option apply options for all animals.
type Option interface {
BirdOption
DogOption
}
type weightOption float64
func (o weightOption) ApplyDog(c *config) { c.Weight = float64(o) }
func (o weightOption) ApplyBird(c *config) { c.Weight = float64(o) }
func WithWeight(w float64) Option { return weightOption(w) }
type furColorOption string
func (o furColorOption) ApplyDog(c *config) { c.Color = string(o) }
func WithFurColor(c string) DogOption { return furColorOption(c) }
type maxAltitudeOption float64
func (o maxAltitudeOption) ApplyBird(c *config) { c.MaxAltitude = float64(o) }
func WithMaxAltitude(a float64) BirdOption { return maxAltitudeOption(a) }
func NewDog(name string, o ...DogOption) Dog {…}
func NewBird(name string, o ...BirdOption) Bird {…}
Interface Type
To allow other developers to better comprehend the code, it is important
to ensure it is sufficiently documented. One simple measure that contributes
to this aim is self-documenting by naming method parameters. Therefore,
where appropriate, methods of every exported interface type should have
their parameters appropriately named.
Approvers and Maintainers
Approvers:
- Liz Fong-Jones, Honeycomb
- Evan Torrie, Verizon Media
- Josh MacDonald, LightStep
- Sam Xie
- David Ashpole, Google
Maintainers:
- Anthony Mirabella, Centene
- Tyler Yahn, New Relic
Become an Approver or a Maintainer
See the community membership document in OpenTelemetry community
repo.