When attempting to [set up the Docker development environment](https://meta.discourse.org/t/install-discourse-for-development-using-docker/102009), I was seeing the following error when running `d/boot_dev --init`:
```
ActiveRecord::NoDatabaseError: We could not find your database: discourse_development. Available database configurations can be found in config/database.yml. (ActiveRecord::NoDatabaseError)
```
Running `db:create` before the `db:migrate` fixed this issue for me. It appears to be safe to run `db:create` even if the database already exists, running `d/rake db:create` locally shows an info message at the database already exists, but doesn't exit with an error.
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on custom flags
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on custom flags
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on backups
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on plugins list
* DEV: tweaks on admin table
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on chat plugin
* apply prettier
* apply lint
* DEV: removed commented out code
* DEV: removed unnecessary div element
* scroll to the element
* remove the workaround
* revert
* add an extra assertion
* add enabled check
* improve switching
* rm
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
When rendering the initial search options, we re-use the `AssistantItem` component.
`AssistantItem` requires that you pass in the required params to define what _type_ of component it will be - category, tag, tag intersection, user, etc. This flexibility is nice, as we can just loop through all `@results` and pass in params, without having to predefine what _type_ of result it is.
It is is not very good when it comes to seperating the html strucutre of each unique _type_. This is an example of the initial search results:
<img width="408" alt="Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 9 04 18 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/46795697-6246-4b60-be18-fea200a57baa">
You can see that both categories **and** tags are being rendered. The HTML strcuture looks like so:
```html
<ul class="search-menu-assistant">
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
</ul>
```
There is no way to differentiate between the types, even though some are categories and others tags.
This PR adds a _typeClass_ to each component, that will be a additional class included at the top level of the component HTML structure.
```html
<ul class="search-menu-assistant">
<li class="category search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="category search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="tag search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
<li class="tag search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
</ul>
```
_See `.category` and `.tag` attached to each `search-menu-assistant-item`._
This will help us identify which _type_ it is, and allow devs to target and customize each element by _type_.
A followup to f05b984208
* modifiers to keep track of components' lifecycles, instead of did-insert/did-update/willDestroy
* proper glimmer-friendly tracking in related models
* caching
* `@outletArgs`
* gjs
We were using a modifier purely for its lifecycle hooks - not to modify an element. This commit switches to using a helper, which provides a similar lifecycle, but without needing to be attached to an element.
Bug introduced in this PR https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/29244
When the experiment toggle button was introduced, new features did not look right when the toggle button was not available.
In addition, the plugin name can be an empty string. In that case, information about new features should be displayed.
In #29272 we added a backwards-compatible way to prevent duplicate problem check trackers. However, there was a mistake in the PR that would instead create duplicate admin notices. As a result, a number of admins now have multiple copies of the same admin notice in their dashboard.
The root cause was fixed in #29329, preventing new duplicates.
This PR is here to clean up notices that were already created.
Admin notices are meant to be ephemeral. Instead of going through hoops to delete duplicates and update the remaining notices' unstructured field with the correct target, it is a lot less error-prone to delete all notices and let the problem check system re-create them.
The real-time checks run every time the dashboard is loaded, so they will appear to never have been deleted. Any notices related to scheduled checks will be added back on the next run. This will happen within at most one hour, and isn't time sensitive.
…or a tip with the highest priority.
This regressed in 597ef11195 where we got rid of `next()` calls, so we'd render the first tip we encounter.
The commit also adds a test and updates existing ones.
Moves the user-tip from the topic-timeline notifications button to the one at the bottom of the topic page.
Three reasons:
1. new users are more likely to use the button that has the full text (and description) rather than the icon-only one
2. we hide the timeline button when scrolled all the way to the bottom of the page, and then the tip doesn't seems to be attached to anything
3. we might be removing the timeline button altogether in the near future
The visitor stats on the /about page were previously showing as `NaN` immediately after enabling the `display_eu_visitor_stats` site setting because the stats for the /about page are cached and updated once every 30 minutes in a sidekiq job. The `NaN` would go away upon the next run of the relevant sidekiq job, but it's not good UX to display a cryptic `NaN` until the job runs. So, this commit ensures that the visitor stats is not displayed at all until the visitor stats is calculated and available.
Internal topic: t/128480.
Currently, when calling a service with its block form, a `#result`
method is automatically created on the caller object. Even if it never
clashed so far, this could happen.
This patch removes that method, and instead use a more classical way of
doing things: the result object is now provided as an argument to the
main block. This means if we need to access the result object in an
outcome block, it will be done like this from now on:
```ruby
MyService.call(params) do |result|
on_success do
# do something with the result object
do_something(result)
end
end
```
In the same vein, this patch introduces the ability to match keys from
the result object in the outcome blocks, like we already do with step
definitions in a service. For example:
```ruby
on_success do |model:, contract:|
do_something(model, contract)
end
```
Instead of
```ruby
on_success do
do_something(result.model, result.contract)
end
```
Database dumps sometimes reference functions in the `discourse_functions` schema. It's possible that some of these functions have been dropped in a newer version of Discourse. In that case, restoring an older backup will fail with a `ERROR: function discourse_functions.something_something() does not exist` error. The restore functionality contains a workaround for that problem, but it didn't work with functions created in plugin migrations.
This commit adds support for temporarily creating missing `discourse_functions` from plugins. And it adds a simple check if the DB migration file even contains the required `DROPPED_TABLES` or `DROPPED_COLUMNS` constant. We don't need to create an instance of the DB migration class unless one of those constants is used. This makes the restore slightly faster and works around a problem with migrations that execute without `up` or `down` methods (e.g. `BackfillChatChannelAndThreadLastMessageIdsPostMigrate`).
This PR is a follow-up to ea1473e532. When we initially added the experimental feature for automatically adding `[grid]` to images, we add the [grid] surrounding images after all the uploads have been completed.
This can lead to confusion when `[grid]` is delayed to be added in the composer, as users may try to add grid manually leading to breakage. This also leads to issues with Discourse AI's automatic image caption feature.
**In this PR**: we simply move the logic to be added when the images are uploaded and processing. This way, `[grid]` surrounding images is added immediately. We also apply a fix for an edge-case to prevent images from being wrapped in `[grid]` when they are already inside `[grid]` tags.
