`poll` plugin was publishing on `/polls/[topic_id]` every time a non-first post was created. I can't imagine this being needed. It regressed 3 years ago in https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/6359
* DEV: Remove spec that we no longer need.
As far as we know, the migration has been successful for a number of
years.
* FIX: Validate number of votes allowed per poll per user.
They can use the remove vote button or select the same option again for
single choice polls.
This commit refactor the plugin to properly organize code and make it
easier to follow.
Allows creating a bookmark with the `for_topic` flag introduced in d1d2298a4c set to true. This happens when clicking on the Bookmark button in the topic footer when no other posts are bookmarked. In a later PR, when clicking on these topic-level bookmarks the user will be taken to the last unread post in the topic, not the OP. Only the OP can have a topic level bookmark, and users can also make a post-level bookmark on the OP of the topic.
I had to do some pretty heavy refactors because most of the bookmark code in the JS topics controller was centred around instances of Post JS models, but the topic level bookmark is not centred around a post. Some refactors were just for readability as well.
Also removes some missed reminderType code from the purge in 41e19adb0d
This adds a new property, `pluginId` which you can pass to `modifyClass`
which prevent the class from being modified over and over again.
This also includes a fix for polls which was leaking state between tests
which this new functionality exposed.
User flair was given by user's primary group. This PR separates the
two, adds a new field to the user model for flair group ID and users
can select their flair from user preferences now.
In some conditions, pages were skipped. This was implemented in the past
in f490a8d, but then reverted in 04ec543, because sometimes it was stuck
reloading the first page.
The code that loads more results was simplified and a lot of duplicate
code was removed. The logic to remove users who changed their vote was
also introduced again, but just for the regular polls.
The endpoint the existence of the poll and if the current user can see it. It
will facilitate using a poll programmatically, especially if we'd like to create an external poll through a theme component.
Partially revert f490a8d39a because we aren't able to
load more than the initially preloaded voters.
We were always trying to load the 1st page of voters.
Also removed the "remove users who changed their vote" logic as it was not properly working in multiple choices polls.
cc @nbianca
When initially released, the polls had a different design that didn't interact
well with the quote button - https://meta.discourse.org/t/31586
Now that the design has evolved, not being able to select text from inside a poll is
counter productive, so it's enabled again.
* FIX: Fetch last page again if incomplete
The next fetched page number used to increase continuously even if the
last page was incomplete and fetching it again could have new voters.
* FIX: Do not display twice a user who changed vote
A user could appear under two voting options when they changed their
vote because pressing the Load More Voters button updated only the
current option.
The warning was:
DEPRECATION WARNING: Calling `<<` to an ActiveModel::Errors message array in order to add an error is deprecated. Please call `ActiveModel::Errors#add` instead. (called from block (3 levels) in activate! at discourse/plugins/poll/plugin.rb:519)
In some very rare cases, poll options can end up with images that have
no dimensions, in which case, navigating to replies in that post stream
might result in unexpected scrolling (as the browser loads the images
and adjusts its layout).
This ensures that if width/height attributes are missing from an image,
the image is forced to display within a 200 by 200 pixels space.
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
Some plugins hook into Post after save to set custom fields and save again.
For example: https://github.com/discourse/discourse-category-experts/blob/main/lib/category_experts/post_handler.rb#L27
Problem is that in case like that `raw_changed?` is false but all callback are triggered. `extracted_polls` is class atribute therefore that should be reset with each attempt.
That was causing an error:
```
#<ActiveRecord::RecordNotUnique: PG::UniqueViolation: ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint
"index_polls_on_post_id_and_name" DETAIL: Key (post_id, name)=(8967, poll) already exists.
```
Over the years we accrued many spelling mistakes in the code base.
This PR attempts to fix spelling mistakes and typos in all areas of the code that are extremely safe to change
- comments
- test descriptions
- other low risk areas
Some polls with images can be very long. Those which showed a pie chart
for the results had a fixed height set, which meant that some long polls
could be cut off.
* FIX: Show date picker over modal
Previously, scrolling was necessary to see the whole picker.
* FEATURE: Improve validation for polls
Adds new error messages for each of the edge cases. Previously, it
failed with a simple error saying that the minimum value must be less
than the maximum value.
* UX: Copy edit
Headings with the exact same name generated exactly the same heading
names, which was invalid. This replaces the old code for generating
names for non-English headings which were using URI encode and resulted
in unreadable headings.
This encompasses a lot of work done over the last year, much of which
has already been merged into master. This is the final set of changes
required to get Ember CLI running locally for development.
From here on it will be bug fixes / enhancements.
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: romanrizzi <rizziromanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: romanrizzi <rizziromanalejandro@gmail.com>
* DEV: Remove with_deleted workarounds for old Rails version
These workarounds using private APIs are no longer required in the latest version of Rails. The referenced issue (https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/4306) was closed in 2013. The acts_as_paranoid workaround which this was based on was removed for rails > 5.
Switching to using a scope also allows us to use it within a `belongs_to` relation (e.g. in the Poll model). This avoids issues which can be caused by unscoping all `where` clauses.
Predicates are not necessarily strings, so calling `.join(" AND ")` can sometimes cause weird errors. If we use `WhereClause#ast`, and then `.to_sql` we achieve the same thing with fully public APIs, and it will work successfully for all predicates.
Using arrow functions changes `this` context, which is undesired in tests, e.g. it makes it impossible to setup things like pretender (`this.server`) in `beforeEach` hooks.
Ember guides always use classic functions in examples (e.g. https://guides.emberjs.com/release/testing/test-types/), and that's what it uses in its own test suite, as do various addons and ember apps.
It was also already used in Discourse where `this` was required. Moving forward, it will be needed in more places as we migrate toward ember-cli.
(I might later add a custom rule to eslint-discourse-ember to enforce this)
In newer Embers jQuery is removed. There is a `find` but it only returns
one element and not a jQuery selector. This patch migrates our code to a
new helper `queryAll` which allows us to remove the global.
This is long overdue. We had a lot of (not linted) code to initialize
our test suite as part of the Ruby `test_helper.js` bundle.
This refactor moves that out to a `setup-tests` module, which imports
all the modules properly, rather than using `require`.
It also removes the global `server` variable which some tests were using
for pretender. Those tests are fixed, and in the case of widget tests,
support for a `pretend()` was added, which mimics our acceptance tests.
One problematic test was removed, which overwrites `/posts` - this could
break tons of other tests depending on order.
Poll markdown processing failed when there were any heading elements preceding a poll.
(Issue originally reported in babbebfb35 (commitcomment-42983768))
This is where they should be as far as ember is concerned. Note this is
a huge commit and we should be really careful everything continues to
work properly.
Adds an optional title attribute to polls. The rationale for this addition is that polls themselves didn't contain context/question and relied on post body to explain them. That context wasn't always obvious (e.g. when there are multiple polls in a single post) or available (e.g. when you display the poll breakdown - you see the answers, but not the question)
As a side note, here's a word on how the poll plugin works:
> We have a markdown poll renderer, which we use in the builder UI and the composer preview, but… when you submit a post, raw markdown is cooked into html (twice), then we extract data from the generated html and save it to the database. When it's render time, we first display the cooked html poll, and then extract some data from that html, get the data from the post's JSON (and identify that poll using the extracted html stuff) to then render the poll using widgets and the JSON data.
eslint --fix is capable of fix it automatically for you, ensure prettier is run after eslint as eslint --fix could leave the code in an invalid prettier state.
This PR removes the user reminder topic timers, because that system has been supplanted and improved by bookmark reminders. The option is removed from the UI and all existing user reminder topic timers are migrated to bookmark reminders.
Migration does this:
* Get all topic_timers with status_type 5 (reminders)
* Gets all bookmarks where the user ID and topic ID match
* Loops through the found topic timers
* If there is no bookmark for the OP of the topic, then we just create a bookmark with a reminder
* If there is a bookmark for the OP of the topic and it does **not** have a reminder set, then just
update it with the topic timer reminder
* If there is a bookmark for the OP of the topic with a reminder then just discard the topic timer
* Cancels all outstanding user reminder topic timers
* **Trashes (not deletes) all user reminder topic timers**
Notes:
* For now I have left the user reminder topic timer job class in place; this is so the jobs can be cancelled in the migration. It and the specs will be deleted in the next PR.
* At a later date I will write a migration to delete all trashed user topic timers. They are not deleted here in case there are data issues and they need to be recovered.
* A future PR will change the UI of the topic timer modal to make it look more like the bookmark modal.
The poll breakdown modal replaces the grouped pie charts feature.
Includes:
* MODAL: Untangle `onSelectPanel`
Previously modal-tab component would call on click the onSelectPanel callback with itself (modal-tab) as `this` which severely limited its usefulness. Now showModal binds the callback to its controller.
"The PR includes a fix/change to d-modal (b7f6ec6) that hasn't been extracted to a separate PR because it's not currently possible to test a change like this in abstract, i.e. with dynamically created controllers/components in tests. The percentage/count toggle test for the poll breakdown feature is essentially a test for that d-modal modification."
* Remove unused Discourse.SiteSettings
* Remove `Discourse.SiteSettings` from many tests
* REFACTOR: `lib:formatter` was using a lot of leaky state
* Remove more `Discourse.SiteSettings` from tests
* More SiteSettings removed from tests
This required properly plumbing the guardian into the serializer.
Notably, the default state in the client was not changed - if you haven't voted in
the poll, you need to click the button to view the results instead of the results
being immediately visible on page load.
Implements https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/138108
This new iteration of select-kit focuses on following best principales and disallowing mutations inside select-kit components. A best effort has been made to avoid breaking changes, however if you content was a flat array, eg: ["foo", "bar"] You will need to set valueProperty=null and nameProperty=null on the component.
Also almost every component should have an `onChange` handler now to decide what to do with the updated data. **select-kit will not mutate your data by itself anymore**
* DEV: Fix the function prototype observers deprecation
DEPRECATION: Function prototype extensions have been deprecated, please migrate from function(){}.observes('foo') to observer('foo', function() {}). [deprecation id: function-prototype-extensions.observes] See https://deprecations.emberjs.com/v3.x/#toc_function-prototype-extensions-observes for more details.
* DEV: Fix the function prototype event listeners deprecation
DEPRECATION: Function prototype extensions have been deprecated, please migrate from function(){}.on('foo') to on('foo', function() {}). [deprecation id: function-prototype-extensions.on] See https://deprecations.emberjs.com/v3.x/#toc_function-prototype-extensions-on for more details.
* DEV: Simplify `default as` imports
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
The bug was mentioned here: https://meta.discourse.org/t/poll-name/136436
I added specs to cover existing behaviour and refactored can_see_results method.
Guard condition should apply only if the poll result setting is set to `staff_only`.
In other cases, user can see results when the poll result setting is set to `always` or user voted or poll is closed.
This commit mostly get rid of the later() call and encapsulate all pie chart display logic inside discourse-poll-pie-canvas widget instead of sharing it between discourse-poll-pie-chart and discourse-poll-pie-canvas
For various reasons, users may want to change their response to a poll.
Currently they have permission to do so, however it is hidden behind the 'Hide
results' button. Since what this button does is take the user back to the vote
panel, it seems more appropriate to name it 'Show vote', where it becomes
obvious that it can be modified and re-submitted.
As discussed here [1], there are mulitple users, myself included, who assumed
that editing a misclick response was impossible. This improves the label to make
it more descriptive of the action actually being taken.
[1] https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-remove-my-choice-in-a-poll/53642/6
